Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Use this thread to ask any questions related to the Experience League LIVE session titled, “Coworker Unlocked: Transforming CX Workflows with Adobe CX Enterprise Coworker" Experts are monitoring this thread to ensure your questions are answered. Thanks and we hope to hear from you!
I am working with a local AEM as a Cloud Service SDK environment and would like to enable HTTPS access for the local author/publish instance.Currently, the instance is running on the default HTTP port (e.g., http://localhost:4502). I would like to understand the recommended approach for running the local Cloud SDK on HTTPS, similar to production environments.AEM as a Cloud Service SDK (Local) Operating System: Windows/Mac/Linux (update as applicable) SDK Version: 2026.6.26908.20260625T154911Z-260600
Hi , as part of the requirement i need to check for a specific pattern of consent where i have to use regex in audience. as far as i know there is no way that i can use regular expression in audience. So, i am trying to use segmentation service where i need to use pql to achieve the same. but i am getting “ 403 Forbidden User region is missing “ error. Can anyone please let me know if it’s possible through segmentation api’s or can let me know why i am getting region mission error. i am giving below headers in the request.1.Accept2.Content-Type3.Authorization4.x-api-key5.x-gw-ims-org-id6.x-sandbox-name7.x-request-id Thanks in advance.Usha.
Hi Community,We are experiencing an issue with the Target Dataset filter in the Source Dataflows list in Adobe Experience Platform.When we select a specific Target Dataset as a filter, the Source Dataflows list does not appear to return the corresponding dataflows.Expected Behavior: When a Target Dataset is selected, the Source Dataflows list should display only the dataflows associated with that specific dataset.Actual Behavior: The list does not return any results when we apply the selected Target Dataset filter.Has anyone else experienced this issue? Is this a known limitation or issue with the current AEP UI?Any insights or workaround would be appreciated. Thanks!
Hi all,We're setting up server-side conversion tracking for LinkedIn Conversions API (CAPI) in Adobe Experience Platform, and have run into two separate issues while exploring both integration paths. Would appreciate guidance on either. Question 1: Destination SDK — headers field not accepted in destination server configWe're building a custom streaming destination server via /authoring/destination-servers to call LinkedIn's Conversions API directly. LinkedIn's API requires several static headers beyond Authorization (X-Restli-Protocol-Version, X-RestLi-Method, Linkedin-Version), but adding a headers array inside httpTemplate causes a 400 Bad Request:"type": "http://ns.adobe.com/aep/errors/DEST-0007-400","title": "Unreadable request: Invalid JSON input at line: 18, column: 26.Incorrect type found for fields: [headers, httpTemplate, value]."payload attempted{ "name": "Dest_LinkedIn_ConversionsAPI", "destinationServerType": "URL_BASED", "urlBasedDestination": { "url": { "templ
We have multiple campaigns and events that we’re sending emails for throughout the week. Our internal employees would like to receive all the emails, but the communication limits are blocking them from receiving if we send more than one email/day. Is there a way to get around the communication limits for certain contacts? If I create a separate distribution list (ex. mktg-team@company.com), will this still be a problem? How is everyone else dealing with this issue? I don’t have the time to upload all of our emails to a shared drive/Teams folder for our internal folks to access.
Provide a native Workfront notification capability for asset status changes in AEM Assets.ProblemWhen an asset submitted from Workfront changes status in AEM Assets, the user who originally uploaded or submitted the asset should receive a notification in Workfront. The notification should be configurable so customers can define whether notification is required and/or which asset status changes should trigger a notification.A two way Fusion integration between AEM Assets and Workfront can be used today to sync updates between the two systems. However, there is currently no native notification capability for the Workfront users to track the status change. ImpactThis would provide better visibility into the asset lifecycle and reduce the need for users to manually check asset status or coordinate with other teams. It would also allow users to take immediate action when an asset is rejected or requires changes, reducing delays in the content production and approval process.
Native dependent dropdowns in custom forms, where an admin defines which child options are available for each parent value, and the child dropdown shows only those options at runtime. It should work with forms used on projects, tasks, requests and documents, so the values map cleanly to AEM metadata. Problem StatementIn Workfront custom forms, a dropdown can't limit its choices based on the value picked in another dropdown. Form logic can show or hide fields, but it can't filter the options inside a dropdown. Validation logic can block an invalid combination, but users still see every option and only find out after they choose wrong.ExampleA manufacturer's form has two fields: Model Range and Model Derivative. When the user picks Model Range = Range A, Model Derivative should only offer the derivatives that belong to Range A. Today it shows all of them, and nothing stops the user picking an invalid pair at runtime. ImpactUsers can submit invalid combinations, such as a derivative that
Currently, when sharing Adobe Workfront ( as well as Firefly and Express) links through Microsoft Teams and Outlook, the links are not distinguishable from each other, which makes searchability and quick referencing a challenge. It would be amazing if those links could be prepended by the Project Name or for it to display in the image preview.
On Prem AEM 6.5 LTS Service Pack 2 -We’ve created an Adaptive Form but are having issues attempting to create a new Adaptive Form Fragment. After creating and opening the fragment for edit the page is missing the plus icon to add components and we cannot click and drag any component onto the page.Also, clicking the configuration wrench icon at the top level fragment1 or guideRootPanel does not load the configuration options on the left.We’re not seeing any error on the browser side and the only thing in the error log is the following which doesn’t seem to be the issue…?16.09.2026 13:08:49.963 *ERROR* [[0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1] [1789578529526] GET /content/forms/af/reference-fragments/address.html HTTP/1.1] com.day.cq.wcm.core.impl.designer.DesignerImpl No design at /etc/designs/fd/af/default. Using default.16.09.2026 13:08:49.996 *ERROR* [[0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1] [1789578529994] GET /libs/wcm/core/content/pageinfo.json HTTP/1.1] com.day.cq.wcm.core.impl.designer.DesignerImpl No design at /etc/designs
Hi All, I am trying to disable CDN caching in AEM Cloud - As per https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-learn/cloud-service/caching/how-to/disable-caching we can do the below - <LocationMatch "$URL$ || $URL_REGEX$"> # Removes the response header of this name, if it exists. If there are multiple headers of the same name, all will be removed. Header unset Cache-Control Header unset Surrogate-Control Header unset Expires # Instructs the Browser and the CDN to not cache the response. Header always set Cache-Control "private" # Instructs only the CDN to not cache the response. Header always set Surrogate-Control "private"</LocationMatch>However, there is no mention on how to validate the same?I did add the above property in my vhost file but the CDN logs still show the cache as HIT versus MISS or PASS.<LocationMatch "^/etc\.clientlibs/.*\.(js|css)$"> Header unset Cache-Control Header unset Surrogate-Control Header uns
It might be that I am just missing something, but I want to see if there is an easier way to view the Document ID in the new Unified Approval setup. When I click on the file it gives me a menu, but the Details area does not provide the ID. The only way I have found to get the ID is to click on Share and then look at the link that is provided. Is there another way that does not involve creating a report? Or a way to customize the document table to add the ID column? Thanks!
Why its not included?Create a Decision Item | Adobe Journey Optimizer
Hi all,Based on the AWS Migration documentation, the IP addresses need to be added by Company IT department. I reached out to them, and they asked for the following additional information.Source IP/ or usernames (which ever is applicable):Destination urls:Port numbers:APP ID: Can someone help me how to get these details? Regards,Gowtham
I came across this adapt To session about AEM Forms rule authoring that involves using the coding agents. Looking forward to try this out.Has anyone tried this yet and would love to hear more on their take on this topic.https://adapt.to/2026/schedule/reimagining-aem-forms-rule-authoring-with-coding-agentsI do not see the link to the github repo yet. I will also post it here once I find it.
I am an admin for Adobe Analytics and CJA for my company account. However, when I use Adobe Debugger, the below message has started to show when trying to validate our data on the website. I have tried checking my permissions, logging in and out of Experience Cloud & Debugger, I have also reset the debugger, as well as clear my cache and cookies for good measure. Does anyone know why this might be happening?
Heloo ,We recently completed our Adobe Web SDK implementation, and all data is being sent through the XDM object. Data is successfully flowing into Adobe Analytics, and reporting looks correct with no major issues.However, we are seeing some fields fail in AEP datasets due to data type validation errors. This has raised a question about the overall implementation approach.Current SituationWeb SDK implementation is fully based on the XDM object. Adobe Analytics is consuming the data successfully. Some records are failing in AEP datasets because certain fields do not match the expected XDM data types. The Adobe/AEP team has suggested creating a separate Datastream and sending some data through the data object instead of XDM to avoid validation issues.My UnderstandingFrom what I know:Adobe Analytics is generally more flexible and can process data even when some values do not strictly match XDM data types. AEP applies strict schema validation, and records can be rejected if incoming data d
It would be useful to be able to use Regex when creating segments in Adobe Analytics to help segment based on patterns/sequences rather than on specific values. It would also prevent the need for building complex, “stacked” segments with multiple criteria/containers.
Hey community!Excited to share a technical win that I think many email developers will find valuable - especially those pushing the limits of what's possible in Outlook.The ChallengeWe recently tackled a design requirement that most email developers would consider "not possible in Outlook" - applying different border-radius values to each individual corner of an element, dynamically, within a complex multi-row email module.Most of us are familiar with the standard workaround for rounded corners in Outlook: the arcsize property on VML <v:roundrect>. It works well, but it applies a uniform radius to all four corners. The moment you need, say, a 20px top-left, 0px top-right, 8px bottom-right, and 16px bottom-left - you're stuck. At least with the conventional approach.The Solution: VML <v:shape> with Custom Path DataThe key insight is moving away from <v:roundrect> entirely and using a <v:shape> element with a custom path attribute. This gives you full control over
Why no offers are returned if you can side on the right side of the screen that some are exisitng on that sandbox? :)
When the duration of a Task or Issue exceeds 1000 days, Workfront's Workload Balancer and related services reset or fail to evenly distribute planned hours across the entire duration. This is not due to the total number of planned hours, but specifically the duration threshold. The Workload Balancer documentation mentions that allocations display as zero after the 1000-day or 1000-hour limit is reached, but does not explicitly clarify that you cannot continue allocating hours beyond this limit. It is recommended to break Issues or Tasks that span longer than 1000 days into smaller, sequential Issues/Tasks (e.g., annual or biannual segments).This is a design flaw and needs to be remediated.
I want to send a Custom Action POST request to CRM during a journey workflow: jo_status_code for this sendout shows 400 without any further details. I asked support for help Additionally test authentication shows that the test is successful. Did you come across that this feature might be bugged? So the error might be with my request structure. How would you futher debug? :(
I’m being asked to research the potential benefits of using the Workfront integration for Microsoft Teams. Since we don’t currently have access to it in our Teams app store, we need to provide a use case for IT to authorize use. While reading through the Adobe Experience League documentation, I read that you could receive (certain) notifications through Teams that you would normally get in Workfront or Outlook, which would be an excellent use case for cutting down on emails or responding to notifications faster since our employees are in Teams 99% of their worktime. However, I noticed that the access requirements say that the article content applies to Standard licenses. Does this mean users that are Light or Contributor will not receive any notifications in Teams from Workfront? They are the users who are primarily asked to approve work and are tagged when more info is needed for their requests, so it would be a bummer for our use case if they didn’t get the notifications. If you hav
Hi Everyone, I have a list of Audience Names along with their corresponding Audience IDs in Adobe Experience Platform (AEP).I would like to identify which Adobe Journey Optimizer (AJO) journeys are using each of these audiences. In other words, for each Audience ID in my list, I would like to extract the associated Journey Name and Journey ID.Since the list contains a large number of audiences, manually checking each journey is quite time-consuming.Could anyone please advise if there is an AEP Query Service SQL query, system dataset, or any other recommended approach/API that can be used to extract this information in bulk?Ideally, I am looking for an output in the following format: Audience Name Audience ID Journey Name Journey ID Audience A xxx-xxx Journey 1 xxx-xxx Audience A xxx-xxx Journey 2 xxx-xxx Audience B yyy-yyy Journey 1 yyy-yyy Audience B yyy-yyy Journey 2 yyy-yyy Audience B yyy-yyy Journey 3 yyy-yyy Audience B yyy-yyy Journ
Hi, I am doing a POC where I am connecting my Trial Salesforce Account with Adobe Fusion. I am using latest PKCE feature in Fusion to connect with Salesforce.Reason is:Salesforce latest API version enabled PKCE by default for all Oauth requests and it is grayed out so we can’t change it. Older connected apps will work without any issue but newly created app will not work with PKCE settings. If we want to disabled this feature we need to conenct with Salesforce Customer support serice. After creating Salesforce External Client app will all required settings and callback URL. I am getting below error:{"detail":"Connection failed.","message":"The request failed due to failure of a previous request.","code":"SC424","statusCode":424,"suberrors":[{"message":"Function 'randomBytes' not found!","name":"IMLError"}]}If anyone has any idea about this issue please let me know. Please remember it is happening with a newly created Salesforce App not the older or existing app. Thanks!
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
