Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
OverviewWe’ve expanded Workfront Fusion’s API observability so you can monitor scenario executions in far greater detail from your own tools. The October release adds two new execution endpoints, exposes new monitoring fields on existing endpoints, and removes the requirement to scope execution listings to a single scenario. Use these capabilities to build alerts, aggregate errors, and troubleshoot runs without switching to the Fusion UI.What’s newGet Execution Details — GET /api/v3/logs/{executionId}/details returns a paginated list of an execution’s activity events (messages, warnings, errors, timestamps) so you can replay the timeline that led to a failure. Get Execution Bundles — GET /api/v3/logs/{executionId}/bundles returns module-level input and output bundles for a single execution, ordered by cycle → module → operation. Inspect the exact data each module received and produced. deactivated & deactivationReason — new fields indicate whether an execution deactivated its scen
Hi,We have a requirement to add custom properties in the filter, so that users can easily search based on the values for those properties. We have three custom property which are of type String, and I want to add them to this filter: I could see that OOTB, these are the only options under: /libs/cq/gui/components/coral/common/admin/customsearch/searchpredicatesCan someone suggest if we can add custom properties to filter with String values. Thank you.
Hello, We are using AEM 6.5.22 (on premise version). which uses Apache Tika-core and Tika-parsers bundles with versions 1.28.5.Our Infosec team has reported a vulnerability on these versions and suggested to use the versions 3.2.2 and above. As I checked the maven repository : https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.tika/tika-core all the versions below 3.2.2 have vulnerability. We cannot directly updated the versions on our side as this is OOTB.Also, when checked with the latest service pack (6.5.25) also doesn’t have latest tika-core. Any thoughts/suggestions would be much appreciated. Regards,Rohit
OverviewThe Adobe CX Coworker connector for Workfront Fusion lets you call Adobe CX Enterprise Coworker from an automation scenario. Instead of building API calls and parsing JSON yourself, send a plain‑language prompt and let Coworker interpret the request, run the applicable skills, and return a conversational result you can use later in the flow.The connector provides two modules:Run a Prompt — Starts a new Coworker request. By default this module waits for Coworker to finish and returns the result, including both the natural‑language summary and any structured outputs the skill produced. Get Execution Status — Polls an earlier request to check progress or retrieve a result if you started the prompt asynchronously. Use this when you want non‑blocking execution or to coordinate long‑running checks across systems.ImpactThe Coworker connector dramatically reduces the complexity of integrating AI‑driven insights and data validation into automation scenarios. Use cases include:Automatica
OverviewThe new Scenario editor experience gives you a faster, more focused way to build, navigate, and debug scenarios. The underlying scenario behavior—mappings, filters, schedules, connections, routers, error handlers, and execution—remains unchanged when you switch experiences. You can toggle back to the classic editor at any time. If you don’t see the toggle, the new experience may not yet be enabled for your organization. What’s newModule cards — compact cards show app icon, module name, short description, and module ID with curved links and status indicators for clearer canvas readability. Improved navigation — Compact view, zoom, Focus mode, and a minimap make it easier to move around and reason about large scenarios. Use cmd/ctrl + K for fast search. You can navigate between executions with a single click. Foldable routers — Collapse a router to hide its routes and reduce visual noise while you work on other parts of the scenario. Dark mode — Editor color theme for low‑light w
Hi- wanted to see if anyone has any ideas on this. We often use a manual proof workflow for an individual reviewer and then once they make their decision we convert to automated an apply a template. This does not lock the first manual stage. I don’t think this is possible system-wide. But wanted to see if anyone has any ideas or a workaround! I know I can make stages with one individual, but am hoping to try to avoid this. I just don’t want anyone going back into the proof once comments are made from prior stages! TYIA
We’ve been working with Workfront Support on this issue, and I wanted to see if anyone else is struggling with this. Here is how support described the issue:“Currently, when a user is auto-provisioned through SSO or the Adobe Admin Console, Workfront assigns the new user's Home Group based on the Home Group of the administrator who triggered the user creation process, which is often the primary system administrator.”What this means for us is that our administrator is in a Home Group that best fits the permissions of our lowest-level users. There are many downstream effects of this. Recently, we wanted to enable the ‘Announcement was added’ notification for our admins, but NOT for our lowest-level users. Unfortunately, this isn’t possible in the current configuration, because if we enable it for the ‘All requestors’ Home Group, then all of our lowest-level users will also be notified. Because our admins weren’t getting these notifications, we missed that Adobe changed the rollout da
Hi All,Our team is migrating reports from AA to CJA. Where we plan to migrate all our report to a dataview in CJA. This has been available for some days after migration. But for some reason the dataview is not available for us to select in compenent migration. We are looking for potential reasons on why this can happen. Best,Naveen.
We’re excited to partner with the Adobe Workfront Product team for a 3-part event series to help you prepare and feel empowered for the changes coming to reviews and approvals in Workfront. Each session will offer live demonstrations, best practices, and more to help you with the transition to Unified Review and Approvals. Sessions include: August 11 – Everything You Need to Get Started with @Elise_Lawley Slide Deck PDF Video 1 Video 2 Event Recording September 15 – Making the Switch: Preparing for your Move with @Travis_Jordan Slide Deck PDF Event Recording Q&A Export October 28 - Making the Switch: Completing Your Move to Unified Review & Approvals with @MikeEngel Slide Deck PDF Event Recording 30-second hype video 6-minute demo video Q&A Export December 10 - Unified Review and Approvals: Your Questions Answered by the Product TeamThis post will serve as a central location for: Registration links for upcoming sessions Event recordings af
Is the recent release to request approval on the live web page the same way you request approval on an uploaded file supported for secure sites (i.e., links that require login or SSO authentication)? In initial testing secure links either could not be displayed or only partially rendered in the Frame.io reviewer with the Chrome extension installed.
Customer requestThe customer requests a native Cancelled system status for Workfront tasks, available as an Equates With option for custom statuses.Current behaviorThe customer can create a custom status named “Cancelled,” but it must map to an existing system status. The closest option is “Complete.” When a task is cancelled using that mapping, its planned hours and assignment remain in place, and the task may be represented as complete in reporting.Customer impactThis can make resource planning and KPI reporting inaccurate: cancelled work may continue to appear as planned work for the assigned user and may be counted with completed work. The customer says the current workarounds are to manually remove planned hours and assignments, or to automate the process using Approval and Adobe Fusion. The automated approach requires workflow development and ongoing maintenance, and may require a Fusion license.Requested enhancementPlease consider adding a native Cancelled system state that can
Hi, I am trying to access support ticket submitted my customer. I can access Adobe Support Portal but it shows an error saying your not a support entitled user. Any idea how to become one. I have asked around without much luck . Can anyone please help?
I took the test last week and scored only 27. I have hands-on experience with Adobe, but I think I need more practice to pass. Could anyone point me to good study materials, and to places where I can take practice tests outside of the official Adobe platform?
AEM JEE Forms workflows - iykyk: We have a couple of customers who have several JEE based AEM Forms workflows (yes, the old LiveCycle LCAs). We are testing a "single click" migration tool and we're wondering if there is broader applicability. Are there still customer using JEE Workflows in production? If you can use it in your practice or if you have a list of customers that could use it, we'd appreciate the opportunity to help. Send me a message.
My team experiencing an issue with table pagination in AEM Guides when tables contain vertically merged (straddled) cells.When a table contains straddled cells that extend across multiple rows, AEM Guides appears to move the entire merged cell and its associated rows to the next page rather than allowing the table to break naturally across pages. This results in tables breaking partway down a page and leaving large amounts of unused white space.We did not encounter this issue in FrameMaker, which handled page breaks within tables containing straddled cells without leaving these large gaps.Has anyone else experienced this behavior in AEM Guides? Is there a setting or workaround that allows tables with vertically merged cells to split across pages similarly to how FrameMaker handles them?Any guidance would be appreciated.
I recommend allowing “Select All” to be disabled and setting a selection limit for checkbox lists—for example, a maximum of three selections from 10 options.
Hello, We are currently on AEM 6.5 and planning Cloud Migration. Noticed that new Cloud onboardings are based on Java 21. So, if we move to Cloud directly, we would not have Managed Services support for Java 21 migration. Wondering if we should move Java 21 with 6.5 LTS and then plan for Cloud. Any suggestions? Specially for Assets with Asset Share Any feedback on challenges faced in Java 21 migration?
Has anyone here taken the Adobe Experience Manager Sites Developer exam? I’m planning to take it soon and would love to hear about your experience. What topics should I focus on, how difficult was the exam, and what study resources helped you prepare? Any tips or advice would be really helpful. Thanks!
ADLS is starting the next round of beta tests for our Business User Credential Exam program, this time focusing on Experience Manager Assets. We need to have as many people as possible complete the beta exam within the beta period, so we can ensure the exam is accurate and fair. Participants can be the first to earn this new credential and get a ready-for-sharing virtual badge. ABOUT THE EXAM The Adobe Qualified: AEM Assets Digital Librarian exam is designed to assess a candidate’s knowledge in organizing assets, managing assets and their metadata, distributing and locating assets in the DAM repository, and using workflows to manage business processes in AEM Assets. The exam is rigorously developed and professionally administered to provide a highly respected Digital Librarian credential. This is a business user credential: however, candidates of all skill levels are desired for the beta exam, as this will all
We are migrating from AEM on AMS to AEMaaCS. We have already configured Azure based Oauth for authors. kindly confirm AEMaaCS supports Oauth based login for author.
DescriptionCurrently, Adobe Analytics 1.4 API provides several powerful endpoints that allow administrators to manage report suite configurations programmatically. These include the ability to:Fetch and update eVars, props, events, and classifications.Retrieve configured processing rules for a given report suite.Adobe has announced that the 1.4 API will be deprecated in favor of the 2.0 API next year. However, these configuration-level features are not yet available in the 2.0 API. Once 1.4 is removed, these critical capabilities will be lost.For many enterprise-scale implementations, this functionality is not just convenient — it is essential. Proposed ideaExtend Adobe Analytics 2.0 API to include endpoints for:Variable Management: Create, update, and fetch eVars, props, events, and classifications at the report suite level.Processing Rules: Fetch and (if possible) update processing rules for a given report suite.Cross-Suite Comparison: Provide efficient ways to compare variable
I have a unique requirement where I want to lock the Project from being able to be edited after 7 days of the Project going to Complete or Cancelled. How to achieve it using Workfront native functionality or Fusion automation?
The version 1 of the flow step callable agents is really great. However, the functionality is very limiting for two reasons (one is the subject of this idea) The limit of a 4000 character prompt (you should be allowed to reference longer-form context for agent decison-making) The inputs/outputs in the Coworker tool are fixed. Please enable the callable agents to be flexible in what fields/tokens are providing input. For example. Agent setup: accept jobtitle value and email value. In flow stepCall agent (parameters): jobtitle is {{lead.job title}}, email is {{lead.secondary email address}}Enable the flow step to pass tokens in, so that different versions of the agent do not have to be created in order to send data from different fields, for the same use, into the callable agents.
Hi everyone,We are using Adobe Campaign Classic 7.4.2 and in a workflow’s Content Management activity, we select Explicit and open the Content selection dialog.The dialog’s default search field is “Name contains”, which searches the content’s internal name (@name). Our users identify content by its Label (@label), rather than its automatically generated internal name. We would therefore like the default search field to be “Label contains”. Is there a supported way to configure this selector to search by Label instead of Name?The relevant input in the xtk:workflow input form is:<input img="ncm:content.png" xpath="content"/>I tested adding filterEditField="@label": <input filterEditField="@label" img="ncm:content.png" xpath="content"/> but the selection dialog still displays “Name contains”.For context: The target schema is ncm:content. Its compute string is already <compute-string expr="@label"/>. The ncm:core navigation hierarchy defines the content list under ncmChan
Description - Allow the option to hide the hourly breakdowns on weekly calendar view or expand the collection of calendar items in the top portion of the calendar Why is this feature important to you - We have many tasks that pull into a calendar view and the many tasks are now all scrunched together at the top. When the list is super long, a scroll bar appears and you can scroll within the tiny area. There is not a way to hide the hourly blocks below or expand the top portion to have better visibility into the items like the current/old calendar weekly view. How would you like the feature to work - Add a toggle button to hide the hourly blocks and/or a way to expand the top portion of the calendar to be able to see more items on the screen. Current/Old Behavior - New Calendar -
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
