Product Communities

We use Workfront to manage mailings. Ideally I would like the planned completion date to show the date the letters drop in the mail to our members; however, it shows the day after the letter mails because we wait on print details. This results in incorrect information to our requesters and the condition shows as late

I know that frame.io has an integration with adobe premiere pro so that you can upload proofs from the premier pro platform and comments from proof show up in premiere pro. It would be extremely helpful if there was a similar integration for workfront proof.

We have a Field that is a multi select checkbox field, sorted in a specific way on the custom form. When run in a report, the report pulls in that information in multiple different ways, not the way we have it planned in the form. WorkFront has told me this is just how that field works however, for our company, we need it displayed in a certain way to reduce confusion and errors when reading the column within the report.

If we could include more verbose meta data in published libraries, no matter how old they are, that would be very helpful.  I had a customer recently and with them, reverse engineer all their Launch rules after the previous Launch “owner” left their company.  It took almost 2 months to trace down rule creators and email ghosts to figure out where everything came from.  I know we have the ability to Audit Events but its very clunky to jump to a different site section to review all this information.

Hey guys, for websites we have the awesome ability to set up a data element in Launch and call _satellite.getVar to get the value of that data element, as described on Launch object reference. We are using this with constant data elements from the core extension to provide some config values to our websites (as described here). Awesome! Now we would like to do the same thing with our apps. Is there any equivalent way of getting the value of a constant data element configured in Launch via the SDK in apps? This would be a killer use case for us and safe us a lot of headache with our agencies. Best,Frederik

Please make the field width for Available Report Suites and "selected report suites" wider on the Classification - Create FTP Account screen as our our report suite names are cut off and can't tell which one is the staging vs production one. Example below of it being cut off: 

Would be great to see the ability to specify the relevant permissions at the Workspace custom template level to give specific users the ability to edit that Workspace custom template.

When you change the name of a document and then upload a new document on the blue bar of the document you change the name of: It will not keep the name of the document you edit the name for. It keeps the initial name. For example: If I change the name of a document from "ABC123" to "ABC768" and then upload a new document on top of it -blue bar- Under ProofHQ drop-down where you see the versions it will show you "ABC123" Not "ABC768" Please see attached image for reference.

We would like to see the name of each file under Document Details> All Versions. Please see attached image for reference.

It'd be great too have the functionality of reporting on how many comments were made in a proof. We want to see a report with the number of comments made in a proof. It'd be great to also report on how many documents are stored in the documents tab. Please see image for reference.

Need the ability to rename categories for our requesters different from what we call those categories in our reporting for internal purposes (because sometime corporate lingo doesn't mean anything to our customer). Would resolve if we have two labels for field titles: one that the end-users sees when they make requests, and one used for the back-end label for admins who have to order and organize the many fields.

When configuring Queue Topics and Topic Groups, the text from those object's description field is displayed as a tool tip when the user hovers over the topic. I would like for this functionality to be extended to the first layer of the New Requests dropdown, where each queue project is listed. I would like the text from the project's description field to be displayed as a tool tip when the user hovers over each queue. Currently the tool tip just shows the project's name, which is duplicative.

Ability to adding urgency to notifications based on time frame (i.e. flag as urgent if needed in a couple of hours, etc.)

To prevent users from selecting date or time options that are truly not options, we need the ability to lock-down what specified date/time ranges are available from which a requester can select as they pertain to specific services. (Example: if a requested service is known to take 3 days minimum, then "next day" should not be an option for the requester to select after they've selected that specific service, as it creates an impossible scenario).

For reporting purposes, would like the ability to merge values within the fields - there is no merge functionality now (Recommendation from Workfront is to use a name that is versatile enough to use across multiple forms - OR - use fields we can concatenate with a calculated field, but this isn’t practical and won’t really suffice long-term).

Please show the rule name when a user is viewing / editing a rule's components. It is very easy to lose your place. In DTM, everything was on the same page, with rule name and different components available there, so it was quick and easy to move thru. Now, everything requires a click, and each click results in a screen without the rulename visible. Example:Create or edit a rule.Click an event, condition, etc.The screen shows "Edit Rule" as the title - that's it. The only way to find the rule name if you forget (or want to verify) which one you opened is to click Discard or Save.IDEA: Use the "Edit Rule" space to provide a descriptive title (e.g., "<Rulename>: <Event/Condition/Action>") or at a minimum the first 60 characters of the rule name (e.g., "Edit Rule: <first 60 characters of rule>...") with ellipsis and title attribute to show rest on hover. For those of us interrupted often, this would save a lot of time of lost work, do-overs, fixes, when we're f

DICK'S Golf & GG Internal Display March - June Digital 2020This is a perfect example of why I miss having the X in the corner of a proof to close out. If I had that I could jump between proofs.With beta test I am having to use back button to get out of proof and it is a pain to keep getting to next proof.

Ability for a user to delete a project/task/comment ONLY if the user created a project/task/comment.

When exporting to excel date fields will bring in a timestamp and hour fields will bring in the word "hours" - regardless of how this is programmed to display in Workfront. Idea: Allow option for this type of data to be included or not included in reporting.

When you click on the "New Task" button on the home screen, the information you can add there is very limited. After you add the new task, you can click on the task, or go to the "requests I've submitted," and add more info. Eventually you can get to an "Edit" button where there is even more options to edit. It would be great if there were more editing options available up front when creating the new task or request from the home screen.

We have users that would like to see all of their tasks in the home screen in a Agile, Kanban board style. This would make each task/request appear as an Agile card, containing the basic information for them to work on.

We'd love to have the ability to view the data from custom forms attached to requests, from the Home page. The Home page used to have an "Edit Custom Form" link where you could at least see the custom form data. That link was removed in the last release and we can no longer access the custom form data on our requests from the home page, thus requiring us to go into each request and click on multiple tabs to get to the info we need to complete the work.

It would be real helpful to be able to add notes / text to each column / image request in the Experience Cloud Debugger. This way, when we click through a journey and send image requests with each click, we can note what we did to generate each request. Then using the wonderfully helpful Download feature, we could get that packaged up in 1 neat file and pass along. C'mon, PLEASE!!!!!

The Transfer File step in a workflow can be configured to optionally delete a source file after transferring the file when the protocol is SFTP or Amazon S3.This option is not available when the protocol is "File(s) present on the Adobe Campaign server".If I am developing a new workflow or am troubleshooting an existing workflow, I may want to run the workflow on the same file several times.  It is inconvenient to have to upload the file to the Campaign server each time I run the workflow because the Transfer File step automatically deletes the file.Please add a "Delete the source files after transfer" option for the "File(s) present on the Adobe Campaign server" protocol so that the workflow author can turn this option on and off as needed.

It would be great if we could add issues to a task from the right side task summary panel in the New Workfront Experience.