Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
By design and that there is a hard-limit on the characters displayed in drop downs of 25 or 26 characters. Requesting that everyone agrees that the character limit be increased to 40 characters.
This is a little thing that would make a surprisingly big difference for me. Right now, in Launch I can only view 10 Rules or Data Elements at a time, with a "Next>" button to get to rules 11-20. There isn't a way to really now how many rules I have overall, which is also a very minor complaint.Ideally, I could define how many elements to see- 10, 20, 50, view all... An eternal scroll feature would be nice too. The real use case is this: I may not remember exactly the name of the rule I'm looking for (maybe someone else created it), so I want to be able to look through all the rules quickly.
When viewing the list of rules or data elements, it would be handy to have a new column for the rule event type, and for data elements the data element type i.e. cookie, custom code, JS variable etc.These could then be used in the search filter options to view, for example, all click based rules for a vertical.(Apologies if this has already been posted somewhere!)
Very helpful to add customised notification to inform System Admin if a new user created from Group Admin. This will help System admin a lot to keep closer eye for number of licenses paid and unpaid.
Hi,As far as I know CDF exports all the data; is it possible to filter CDF data based on the Data Source ID, or URL o any other parameter? Thanks
Currently there is limited functionality for Programs. It seems they are simply a container for a group of projects. It would be helpful to increase the capabilities to allow for Master & Child programs for larger initiatives spanning multiple years/portfolio's/etc
We know that an 8 hour work day exists, however, we don't typically have 8 hours of uninterrupted time to do task work. We have meetings, etc. and sometimes those are ad hoc and doesn't make sense to put into Workfront. We would like to be able to set the "over capacity" task threshold to 6 hours so it highlights a day's hours red in the resourcing/scheduling view for anything over 6 hours.
Ability for users to customize which email notifications are sent instantly vs. daily or not at all. Example: There is a user on two teams. One team's request are business critical and are needed instantly via email. The other team receives requests that are not critical and not needed via email.
Downloading a reviewed pdf with comments When a PDF is uploaded to Workfront, the reviewers and approvers go ahead and put their comments on the documentI would like to download that document as a pdf, with the comments on.This is not available nowAs the system lets me print out the comments with related pages, I believe there could also be a way to download the document with the comments.
Dear League! At time of writing, only Analytics Admins can share an Analysis Workspace with Groups of Users. I think this should be a privilege that can be given to any User through the Admin Console, like Curating Workspaces. Making someone an Admin just so they can share a Workspace with Groups is far overkill. Best regards,Frederik
Hi there, I like the data delivers option via Data Warehouse delivery very much. Especially because you can get a native Tableau format. But I would like to get at least 12 months of data rolling. Currently there´s no option that meets our requirement. Currently available options A/B (see attached picture) A) If I choose option "A" the period is not rolling! B) "B" doesn´t provide at least 12 months. I mean it makes no sense to me. The advantage of using the Data Warehouse option is to generate data automatically to feed 3rd party systems (e.g. Tableau in a native format). No? So why not providing a rolling preset of at least 12 months??? Okay, I could use report builder (Excel plug in) instead. But then I will lose the Tableau export format!!! Simply put: I would like to get a preset that provides last 12 months rolling in a Tableau export format. Cheers, Juergen
Hi Adobe, It will be very helpful if there is a feature to select the traits we would like to include from third party data sets in marketplace while building a LAL model. Current features only allow to exclude the traits with a maximum of 500 trait exclusion. With thousands of traits in each dataset, it makes it extremely difficult to arrive at the traits we are interested to use, by using exclusion method. Also it will be nice if we can see the total count of traits selected while building the model for additional validations. Thanks
It would be very helpful to be able to use an Approval Process for a Document Approval, that allows using Groups/Teams as recipients, for instances when the "Review & Approval" tool is overkill.
It would be great if we can get some analytics on each Launch property. I found myself asking these questions from time to time:- What are the Rules and Data Elements in production library that have not been fired or used for a long time.- What rules that are causing JS errors occasionally-How many Rules and Data Element in each property, and breakdown by their types-Who are the most active users in each property-Publishing frequency of each property...... With these data, we can keep each property clean and optimized, and just better governance overall. Best of all, these data will be available as a report suite in Analysis Workspace.
When you are working from a storyboard, you have to navigate to the task or issue page to make updates, view additional details, etc.I think it would be great if we could open the task or issue as a floating (pop-out) window so that we can stay in one place to get work done. JIRA and many other agile products do this and it is a nice UX.
Currently, if the creator of a custom form is removed from their home group, the custom form continues to be shared with the group, but the creator loses their access despite still showing up as the owner and having sharing access. Solution would be to have the creator continue to have access.
We'd like to be able to report on how long it takes for proofs to be approved within stages. This would be particularly helpful for us to see where we can be more efficient in proofing workflows with the various groups/stakeholders.
When creating a custom form, the user's Group is automatically added to the form's permission and the form creator cannot remove this group from the permission set. This is problematic when trying to comply with CCI requirements. By default, only the form creator should be added to the permissions.
why can't you pull in a custom form into a report with all its fields and pull in multiple to produce a report? why can you pull in section breaks of a custom form into a report? Reports can't just be tabular they need to have an aesthetic and be able to show groups of information.
Can we have a new metric "Monthly returning visitors" that take into account visitors with 2 or more visits in the same month ?
It would be great to see the team agile view (Kanban or Scrum) in a report or dashboard. We think the user experience of navigating to people/teams is confusing for users to find a high level visual status of the work that is planned.
During the most recent WF update, the last name of the person tagged has been removed. You can see the last name while searching but once the contact is selected the last name is removed from view. It doesnt show back up until after you have submitted the notification. Since you can not add or edit a notification once its submitted if by chance you selected the wrong one your only option is to delete. We have several users internal workers and clients with common names and its helpful to be able to verify the correct person was selected before submitting.
Hi team,Is it possible to directly go to the last page in the reports. Its difficult to navigate to page with last row of data without knowing which is the last page, for eg if my last row of data is at page 22 then how do I figure it out.
The internet standard for required fields in a form is to have a red * Next to the field to indicate what form objects are required. In Workfront forms these are bolded. This requires an additional unnecessary training step by our team to inform users that Bolded items are required. Could we have the developers change the bold to *?
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
