Product Communities

I'd like to see an EASY way to prevent a collection of leads from synching to CRM. My present issue is leads from embargoed countries. I don't even want them in SFDC. I'd also like an easy way to setup these designations - e.g. in a lead partition, or members of a program, etc.I would also use this for other scenarios such as staff, testers, etc. There are a variety of situations where this would be extremely helpful.The thought of having to go in and retrofit hundreds of campaigns to add in exclusion steps for something like this is depressing.

The text is a bit small. The radio buttons are small and you can select an option clicking the text (can only click the radio circle). Description text fill the full width of the page, but nothing else does, and that long of a row of text is hard to read.

I would like to be able to remove the 'All Requests' tab from a user's layout template. I am aware that you can restrict users to only view the requests they have submitted but I do not wish to do that as I want to allow users to view previous year requests from their team members. Once users go to 'All Requests', they can see everyone else's requests. I don't see why this tab cannot be removed.

Hi, When I, as an admin, receive a Marketo ALERT email about a person who filled out a Contact-Us form, I want to be able to approve or reject this person directly from the alert. My idea to you is to add the ability to have CTA buttons or simple links in an alert, that when clicked, will activate Triggered Smart-Campaigns. Thanks, Edo

I see a number of "similar ideas" suggested but when I follow the link the page seems to have been removed... so, the ask:Rather than adjust manually, can the "percent work complete" automate as hours are added to the task. It requires additional manual work to do both. Thanks!

Create a task setting that will allow percent complete to update automatically as a function of calendar time. For instance in a task where a single resource is 100% allocated for a fixed period of time, have a way for the system to update percent complete based on today's date in comparison to the start and end dates.Aut

The max $$LIMIT on API results is 2000. This should be higher, unlimited or set to the next set of results. Currently, assumption is that your query is less than or equal to 2000 results but as you build your data over time, the time values add to your query results. I had to break down my queries to 3 with regards to time and hoping that none of the queries will get over 2000. We are not getting accurate results once those queries go over 2000 results.

Currently, when you manually set a task date (Planned start/completion, Projects start/completion, actual start/completion, etc) the time for the task defaults to 12 Midnight. However, this is less than ideal and since most default views don't have the time displayed it is not intuitive for users that this behavior is taking place. Since the start date takes into account timezones, this results (for us at least) in start dates reflecting one day for people in the Central time zone and the day before for people in the Pacific time zone. It seems it would be ideal that, if the time was going to default to a specific time, it should be defaulting to either the beginning of the system default schedule or to some other time that is manually set in the administrative setup.

It is difficult to use Adobe Campaign Classic if you are a multi tasking person when you have opened Development instance and Production instance at same time. You have the same set up available in both instance. When you want to update something in development instance and unknowingly you're updating in production instance, it will be definitely difficult to use two instance at same time. So we might have any colour differences in the icon or console window screen to differentiate between Production and Development instance.  

The calendars seem very limited in their options and therefore we haven't been able to use them effectively as everyone would like. It would be great if they could be used in conjunction with date fields in the custom forms instead of just the built-in planned, actual, projected dates on projects, tasks, and issues. For example, we have custom form field for date of deployment for our email marketing campaigns. It would great to have those feed into a calendar.

1) Within a given Rule, a note can be added on a Component level (e.g. an Action view), or on a Rule level.  Currently, there is no way to know there are any notes on a given Component, unless you open the Component view. I like being able to also write notes on a Component level, but I don't like that I cannot see an overview of all notes within the Rule, in one place. I would like to see all notes listed in the main Rule overview, with prefixes or section headers signifying which Component they belong to. 2) Within the Publish flow, when you build (e.g. a Dev) environment, it is currently not possible to add a note AND perform the Save action at the same time. You must first Save the build (or Save+Build), which takes you out of the view, and then go back to the Build view, and then add your Note.  This seems like an unnecessary and annoying extra step. I would like to be able to add a Note at the same time I create/update the build, and have it saved at the same

When I create a folder in a task for documents, when it rolls up to the project level, it doesn't bring the folder with it. It just throws the documents in a list. Is there a way to do this?

The idea of the feature is to give Project Owners the ability to say that the approval for an item has been overridden. I know this would need to be a toggleable option by instance (at least) as it wouldn't work for everybody. We use approvals mostly for QA.Workfront is also our product fulfillment program, so we need to be able to complete projects as soon as the necessary work has been done. Sometimes approvals stick around for a bit, despite the work being good.We frequently come across situations where a project owner is having to get around approvals in order to complete their projects. Right now they have to move the object to a non-pending status, delete the approval, and then change the status of the item back. Since project owners already have th eability to do this, it seems silly that we can't have a simple override to prevent confusion when looking back at logs.

Currently, users are frustrated they have to share proofs with others at the time of proof generation when they expected the proof to automatically inherit the sharing settings at the project level. If the project is shared with certain users, then all documents and proofs associated with that project should also have similar default sharing settings/permissions.

The purpose of this idea is to gather all requirements for the next level of program token management. Here they are :New types of tokens required :URL token types (​) so that managing URLs for CTAs no longer requires a 1 page how-to guideImage / File token types, so that updating a image in a email or LP can be done easily without error (​)Form tokens types to enable changing the form in an LP without editing the LP. See List and smart list tokens ()Formula tokens ()All tokens providing program information, tags etc... (​)Multi line text tokens (not rich text, but just multi-line)List of values tokens (​ Thx @Andrew Sielen​)Select field tokens, so that the standard user cloning programs has the possibility to choose values within a limited list (in conjunction with limited rights, see below). See , thx @Robb BarrettColor picker tokens (), which settings could be restricted to a limited set of values.Program level or campaign level UTM tokens that would be automatically appended to ema

I would like a project that is converted from an issue (request) to have the option to inherit the sharing permissions of that issue. Currently, you can select in Tasks & Issues preferences "Allow Primary Contact to have access to the project" but not the issue assignee to have access to the project. There is an extra step (and user training) involved to convert the issue to the project, and then share the project to the same person/team assigned to the issue. Workfront Support advised to set up sharing in the project template itself, however, this will not work in my use case as we use one project template from many requests that get routed to different assignees.

Currently when a report is exported with a filter, it exports correctly. However, when the report is generated via the Send Report action, it only sends the report default data. This request it to allow the user to apply a report filter on the report before it is sent.

It would be awesome if Workfront were to include a one for one list that included both the EVENT by name and the USER NOTIFICATION by name. It would be simple to just add a column to the already existing https://one.workfront.com/s/article/System-level-event-notifications-918243610 visual so that it also includes the Name of the corrisponding notification from the USER's perspective. As it is now ... it's like learning a language and they've only given us the English dictionary. We need the English to Spanish dictionary to understand the full picture for the 95+ email notification settings.

Currently, when a user marks a task as done with my part, the percent complete doesn't get updated. Require the user to update the percent complete based on the work completed.

In the user notification settings (under "Information about Projects I Sponsor"), I would like to see an option to "Automatically subscribe to projects I sponsor." Many of our users take the extra step of manually subscribing to each project they sponsor to ensure they do not miss updates. It would be ideal to automate this process by turning on a single setting in their user profile.

It would be really helpful to see totals in charts. eg: if its a bar chart last column would be totals. makes it very user-friendly.

Planned Hours & Logged Hours are important fields for team members. Currently, the easiest place for a team member to see how many hours they have been assigned and have logged is on the Calendar view on their home screen.We don't really use the Calendar views functions (to personally schedule work) and instead spend most of our time looking at the Work List. With this in mind, we would like to see Workfront show the Planned & Logged Hours on the Work List as they are currently shown on the Calendar view. That is inside the left hand side task list underneath the task name at the same level as the details box.We have attempted to show these as custom fields on the Work List view, however, it isn't possible to show just that assigned users hours. Custom fields can only be populated with the main assignee or the total hours assigned.So in short, please add Planned & Logged hours for the individual assignee to the Work List view.

I have seen some related ideas, though not this exactly.It would be nice to be able to include Teams or individuals for request notifications based on form selections.For example, if there was a selection list for 1) IT, 2) Creative, 3) Legal and I selected the IT and Legal boxes, then the Creative team would not be notified.

Allow the user to sort search results by the fields displayed. ie. Project search - Planned Completion Field

I really would like static lists to be sharable across workspaces, similar as smart lists, snippets, templates etc. are shared.