Product Communities

Request that functionality be included in WF to enable users to include multiple views of data in a report. For example, I'd like to be able to have 2 Matrix Grouping tabs instead of just 1 on a report in order to make it easy to visualize data in multiple ways.

Great to have option for creating separate (customised) Issue / Tasks / Projects priority for Company / Group. Else have the facility to hide one of them for specific Company or Group.MvhKundan

Hi Experts, Client wants to personalize SFMC emails through Adobe Target. I have checked the help docs but didn't find the integration. I believe it is not introduced it. Please confirm.If no, do we have any other approach through which we can personalize SFMC emails using AT?

It would be helpful to get decision comments (i.e. when you make a decision and leave a comment - refer below) to appear in the update emails workfront sends out after a decision is made to proof owners. This will ensure convenience and ease for finding these comments.

We should to be able to run a report for the total number of submissions for each form for a given time period. If I could get really greedy, I would love to see the form name, and the number of total submissions *and* unique submissions for each form. But total submissions by each form name for a time frame would be incredibly valuable as a basic reporting/analytics report.    The landing page report is useless unless your forms are all hosted on Marketo landing pages.

We need a way to export all views to something that can be made static and distributed, such as an XLSX or a PDF. This goes for Reports, but I also need an exportable document from Resourcing. The Legacy Resource Planner allowed you to export to XLS but current tools don't offer any export features. Please add!!

This was available in Legacy Planner. The Workload Balancer only shows summary of hours of the task for that time period but we don't equally distribute hours across the task (some days are heavier). Please update!!

I would like to be able to filter for residents in Washington D.C., however since this is a federal district, and not a city, it doesn't show up in the dropdown menu for GeoSegmentation City, which is making it hard for me to filter the way I want. Does anyone know a work-around for this? The filter I'm using for other cities is:  GeoSegmentation City equals Milwaukeeand GeoSegmentation Region/States equals Wisconsin (United States)and Locale (CI 4) (prop4) equals Milwaukeeand Site Section equals WIIs there a way to do something like this for Washington D.C.? 

To implement use cases as described here, it would be very useful to have the ability to set advanced settings on A4T success metrics. 

Allow layout templates to determine where the user lands when in the Portfolio or Projects tabs. The Portfolio tab defaults to 'Portfolios I Own'. Would like to land on 'All Portfolios'.The Projects tab defaults to 'Projects I Own'. Would like to land on 'All Projects'. When in a Portfolio, it defaults to 'Active Projects'. Would like to land on 'All Projects'.

Farsi (Persian) Language Support As we start to do more business in the middle east it would be nice to have Farsi (Persian) language support for Forms 2.0  

We are having trouble with authorization issue, and if Adobe accept our suggestion, it will be a great help not only for us, but also those who want to grant authority user by user, differently. We suggest to change authorization system as follows:1 manage signal(including derived signal) by data sources, as trait and segment does.2 manage segment and trait folder by data sources, so that we can see folders only that we can access to.- we want to manage folder as same as we manage trait and segment, and suggest to include "choosing data sources" in the folder addition process. (we want to hide floders that users do not have access to.) - folder and folder trait are different now, so it makes us confusing.3 manage profile merge rule function by wild card permission.- also, if those who have no authority to access functions, we want to hide that tab from the menu bar.4 hide [payables] and [integrated accounts] tab from the menu bar, except for the administrator account.5 see da

When archiving a group of emails - it would be helpful to have a way to select multiple batch email programs and drag and drop them into an Archive folder.  Currently move all 2019 emails to an archive folder is a massive manual undertakeing and would be speeded up by selecting multiples at a time. Thansk.

It would be great if users had an option to auto-assign tasks for the duration of the project. Ideally, this would be an option after '6 weeks' in the schedule when only one project is showing that would dynamically set the number of weeks to match the project planned start and end dates. However, if it's a tick box on auto-assign that means I can't see the entire project and I have to scroll, so be it.Yes, if you have a project that spans years it might cause problems. I'd suggest you don't select that option or put it back to 6 weeks in that case.

At this moment as a consumer of Customer Attributes solution, we don't have a mechanism to verify data is synced to Adobe Analytics on the UI, an only possible way to manually validate the in Adobe Analytics, this is so bad from a customer experience point of view, why would a customer need to login every time to Adobe Analytics and verify the data, instead of that if customer attributes platform displays the status on the UI or send a communication to stakeholders really helpful

It would be helpful to allow requesters the ability to attach folders with content already in them to requests rather than attaching content piece by piece. Not only would it help save time, but it would keep pieces of content organized.

I created a wildcard report that calculates the number of days the individual has selected as time-off. To have a more accurate calculation I used the expression WORKMINUTESDIFF so that it would not include any days that are Schedule exceptions (aka holidays) since a lot of people will take off around an extended weekend. I noticed there were incorrect calculations for some of my users and after research discovered that WORKMINUTESDIFF only refers to the Default schedule instead of the user's schedule.I wish there was an easier way to make a time-off report that did not involve so much text mode deciphering and could cleanly calculate John Smith has taken 10 PTO days this year.

I just went through this with Workfront Support and they suggested I add this to the ideas exchange as others may have the same thought.If you go to Statuses, Issues are the only item that you can have more than one set of statuses for (i.e. issue types). However, for our purposes, we have different types of projects: Some projects have custom statuses that are different than other projects. The workaround is to assign statuses by group, but ideally, you would have the ability to select a custom status for projects the same way you can for Issues.

I'm trying to see the differences between two Platform requests. The meaty part of the Platform request, which I control as an implementer is the "events" area of the post body. This is where all of my custom name/value pairs I am sending are contained. In the current formatting of the Debugger, it's nearly impossible to compare two requests side by side because this info is displayed in a tiny cell. You would have to click one cell, copy the JSON object then click the other cell and copy the JSON object and then compare the two using some other tool. Please make it easier to see the differences in the request between these two fields. I suspect this is a challenging task in all of the tools that have switched to sending data in the post request body (e.g. at.js 2.x) instead of as query string parameters.  

It would be helpful if all system managed field mapping, such as the Owner fields, were displayed in the Field Management. It seems odd that they are mapped but not displaying as mapped under the "CRM field mapping." In order to clear up any confusion, ideally those fields would display the associated mapping.

Are there any plans to add visitor participation to Workspace? Would be useful in seeing the outcome of campaigns to events which do not occur in the same visit as the original activity.Or is there an alternative method for achieving the same thing in Workspace?

It would be nice if a project is a predecessor task on a 2nd project, that the predecessor task % complete field automatically update as it's linked project percent completion progresses. for example: Project 1 - is currently at 50% completion, a few tasks within this project are completed and the % completion changes to 60%Project 2 - has a task (Project 1 as an enforced predecessor), as the activity in Project 1 causes it's % completion to update to 60%, it would be nice for the task in Project 2 to automatically update to 60% to coincide.

While it's nice to get Web Service error notifications via Marketo, the information is typically not very useful in an instance with multiple API users as the errors are broken down by type and not by source.It would be great to have error logs provided on a per user/auth basis in the Admin/Web Services interface. We can see per user API request counts, but can't see which users are generating problems.

Problems often arise with actions written in another language. An additional language file could solve this problem, for example.I have installed the German version of Photoshop. But many actions are offered in English. It would be practical to use them here without problems.So either to be able to install a complete second language file, or to be able to switch quickly, or to have an integrated translation of the corresponding terms.I apologize for a possibly bad English, but I use a translator, because I don't know English.

Enabling the User cloning option for any user. This will help in fastening the new user creation overall process.