Product Communities

In workspace, it is currently possible to interpret zero as no value. To build on this feature, I would also like the ability to not display rows that have no value. This would enable workspace users to display rows in a table that are relevant, while 'hiding' the others via the features to interpret zero as no value and display only rows with a value.

It would be great if we had the ability as a System Admin to control what a user can edit in their user profile. The major use case would be stopping a user from editing their email address to a personal one without permission. This would cause control issues. Namely, as a prelude to this, if SSO is set up, if should by default stop a user from changing their email as this should be tied to SSO.

When creating a project using a template with task assignments to job roles, if you are assigned as the project owner and also have your primary role assigned to the tasks within the project, when clicking "Save Changes" to create the project, it would be ideal if you could get a pop-up asking if your name should be selected to self-assign to fill that role for all tasks within the project containing that role assignment. Benefits:For projects that contain only tasks that will also be assigned to the owner, reducing the clerical duty to navigate to the Staffing tab.For projects that contain tasks with multiple job roles, this will save time self-selecting, especially when creating multiple projects on a daily basis.

When a user can't access a work object in Workfront, they're presented with a "Request Access" page, where they can select another user from whom they want to request access. This causes two pain points:There are certain reports, dashboards, projects, and requests that we don't want users requesting their own access - we only want these objects shared proactively, not reactively. Second, there are certain reports, dashboards, projects, and requests that we want shared only with job roles/teams/groups - not individuals. This ensures only qualified users have access, due to their role in the org. The only way that they should gain access to these objects is to have their profile updated to include the appropriate membership. But we can't enforce that, and users just end up requesting individual access which they retain even after they switch teams or job roles.What we want is the ability to specify a redirect URL on a per object basis that prevents the user from

We make extensive use of tags to keep track of what components should appear in which virtual report suite (VRS). When curating a VRS it would be a great time saver to be able to add/remove component tags from this screen in the same way you can else where in the tool (i.e. right click on the component):   

Idea: Some type of customer facing "View History" tab or log in the Adobe Analytics Admin interface containing detailed Marketing Channel Processing Rule change history, similar to how the Processing Rules "View History" tab contains detailed historical changes/versions made to the processing rules.Benefits:Corporate data security requirements regarding detailed logs for any type of administrator access and changes."Why did <some marketing channel report> break/change?" and "Who did this and why was it done this way?" research by administrators. This is especially true for companies that have multiple Adobe Analytics administrators (or are new to the role), or have had these settings changed by contractors or consultants that are long gone.Simply put, if anyone other than you has ever changed a Marketing Channel Processing Rule, this idea is for you.Problem: The Admin Tools Log only contains basic entries like "Marketing Channel Rulesets was approved" and "Marketing Cha

If I build an advanced search filter, and want to change the report structure/hierarchy, I need to redo these filters. Advanced filters are nice for on-the-fly analysis, but sometimes they prove their worth in keeping. Or just because you would like to take the search filter further in an analysis. Being able to save it as a segment and apply it to the panel would be an amazing time saving. 

Communication needs to happen during active projects between Requesters and Workers for success of the project. In a current project (converted from issue queue), the ability to communicate in Updates is not available to requesters. Updates is not in the left navigation for Requesters when looking at an active project. I can't imagine Square is alone in needing the ability to communicate between Requesters and Workers throughout a project lifecycle. I have already run into an issue of a Worker asking a question in Updates to a Requester and the Requester getting the email notification of the question but UNABLE to answer it. Per customer service:Currently, in Workfront a requester can only have view rights to a project. So they would be unable to make comments because they do not have contribute access. They will have contribute access to the issue and would be able to make comments.

I created a CUSTOM form called LEAD GENERATION that has a series of quesions that must be answered prior to submitting a Marketing Request Form (MRF).The form works great. Only problem is when I convert the MRF into a PROJECT, we lose the form data at the project level. The MRF is linked to the project so when I go back in to check the MRF the dats is intact - just not making it over to the Project Custom Form Tab.Does anyone know why this is and how to fix it?I tried uploading files but the system says it cannot upload the. I tried PNG.

In the Reports and Documents areas, the ability to collapse the folder panel on the left side would be very helpful. This would allow more space for the "meat" of the reports list. I would love to see this become a toggle-setting similar to hiding the panel in a project's task list.

At the moment, if you change the name of a classification it breaks all the associated classification rules built in the classification rule builder. Each rule then has to be manually edited to get it working again with the new classification name. I think it would make sense if a classification name change automatically updated the classification rule builder.

Currently when someone with a Planner license adds a new user, they are able to add them with a Plan license that matches their Access Level. However, they cannot add a new User with a Plan license on a different Access Level. We even tried allowing them to be a User Admin for All Users and that didn't work. Obviously, they shouldn't be able to add someone as System Administrator, but is there any reason a Group Admin/User Admin shouldn't be able to add Plan licenses with different Access Levels than their own?My proposal is to allow an access level, like in this case, to allow a Group/User Admin to be able to add a lower level Plan license. Would love to have this functionality.

When I create a new user and click "Show Advanced Options" the default Access Level given to the new user is System Administrator. This seems unnecessarily dangerous, why wouldn't the default user role be the most restricted instead of the least?

We would find it incredibly useful and time saving to be able to move and copy actions between different rules in launch. I'd expect to access the feature by via a clicking with right mouse button on an action to reveal a menu with the options. Please can this be considered?

I think it would be helpful if there way a way to automatically enroll any new users in the new user experience, while still allowing to keep the option for existing users to remain in Workfront classic.Thank you

Currently we need to create mobile viewports manually in setup options.It'll be convenient if we get some mobile viewports added by default.

Add a checkbox to the Adobe Analytics extension to auto-add (enable) AppMeasurement_Module_Integrate (similar to how it's done for AAM and Activity Map).

In many media fields, the biggest factor driving engagement with a video is recency - users want to see something as close to when it happens as possible, and don't care about it more than a couple days later (because there's more new stuff rolling in!). We want a way to use "recency" for an entity as part of a Recommendations Criteria.We are currently working through workarounds with existing custom fields, including things like:a unix timestamp that turns date-times into integers so we can use "less than/greater than" operatorsa field for "daysSincePublished" or "hoursSincePublished" that can similarly use mathematical operatorsBut any of these options requires either the criteria or the metadata to be updated on a consistent basis (daily, or hourly if we want to maintain that granularity).What would be way cooler is if we had date-time entity metadata field(s) that could interpret rolling operators such as "datePublished within last X days" or "dateTimePublished within Y hours" so t

Currently all Access Levels are owned by the System Administrator, so Group-level Admins 1) don't even have any visibility of what permissions their Group users have; 2) Can't change/edit/customize group access levels to meet the needs of the Group they own.I would like to see Group Admins have a greater control of these access-level controls that impact their group

When working with an international company that has branches all over the world, it is very useful to know what region that user is from and the the currency that he is using. Of course, we could have the project based region and currency to facilitate the getting resources from different places around the world, but we need to know the region and the currency of the user to reconcile to their local system. I am proposing to add that in the user profile.

Hi guys,I have recently migrated to Workfront Experience and I note that you cannot copy/paste data from reports with the formatting. It just pastes without the formatting.I copy/paste from reports daily and wish to preserve the formatting.Exporting to excel or PDF is sloppy and doesn't maintain the crisp view I've created in Workfront.Screen shots are not suitable as I edit/add to the text in the pasted location.Cheers,Justin

When converting an issue to a project the drop down window that lists the templates is very narrow. We have over 200 templates and its hard to decipher which template is which

Billing is a very important part of any business and to ensure we are properly billing, please consider adding an approval process for billing records so more than a single user is reviewing and approving.

Although our Dallas Marketo User Meetings meet monthly (which is awesome) -- I'd be interested in connecting with other GOVERNMENT SECTOR Marketo clients to share best practices. Maybe others would value the same for their verticals (Finance, Healthcare, Cybersecurity, etc) 

System Admins should have the ability to configure global notification settings by Group, Access Level, or even Home Team. Some users/teams/groups simply do not need certain notifications, however those might be crucial for other users/teams/groups. The only way to disable a global notification setting right now for select users is to manually set and their personal notification preferences in User Settings. And since this cannot be configured as a default setting when new users are added (i.e. when a new user in X group is entered in WF, set these notification rules:...), you would have to manually maintain that as new users enter the system. Admins should be able to fine-tune default "notification profiles" based on WF's existing user structures in Workfront (whether that be access level, license type, group, etc). This would be a HUGE help balancing the needs of our various departments in the instance. I can't imagine we're the only organization frustrated by t