Product Communities

The API documentation needs to be improved overall. There are things missing from it, and there are references to v4 and v5, without notes about whether or not they're still relevant. It's hampering our integration efforts.

In Classic view when opening a Team the default page that was opened was the Current Iteration. In the New Experience it defaults to ALL Iterations. This is useless and causes an extra click for no valid reason. It should default to the Current Iteration as it did before. Or better yet, allow the customer to choose the default page (via settings).

Hi Marketo team.  I was reading many forums that share my frustration with having to pick one sharing platform when creating a video to use in marketo if we don't want to embed.  I would like to see a way within that creation for a "disable sharing" component or simply let us uncheck all the social sites!  I think I speak for many users that do not want their videos shared beyond their target audience and this would help immensely!Thank you!

One of the main topics in terms of acceptance of the NWE is that the task description and the updates are divided into two tabs.My colleagues keep referring to Classic, where that was possible at a glance.Please find a solution to display the update stream at the same time as the description again.

Description - The date selector in Workspace should float and follow you as you scroll up and down a panel.Why is this feature important to you - My Workspace panels often get quite long and I often have to check/change/remind myself of the time period I've selected. It can be annoying and time consuming to scroll right back to the top of the panel to find the date selector. Having it floating at the top right corner would be fantastic as I could just glance at it at any point in the project to check the date range the project is currently set to, or amend it.How would you like the feature to work - The date selector in Workspace should float and follow you as you scroll up and down a panel.Current Behaviour - Date Selector is fixed at top of workspace panel

We often have projects where specific tasks in the workflow are not always needed or we may discovered they are needed half-way through a project. In these cases, we would like the ability to have pre-set steps in our Workflow template that would only be activated when needed. For instance, we sometimes receive a request for a product that may need committee approval. This task is not always needed but if we add this task into the Workflow template then it is automatically activated when applied. The user has to delete the task when setting up the project which then causes some additional rework for the predecessors and tasks. At times we have gone through the work of removing the task to then find out it is needed later on in the process. We then have to enter a new task and update all the predecessors again. It would save time, effort, and allow for consistency in the task naming if the task could simply remain but be activated when needed. If skipped it would not calculate into the

Hi,   I have a problem. We have set up lead gen form in Marketo and the submissions for these forms from LinkedIn to Marketo are working fine. Fields are mapped, all good. Problem: I have set up a trigger campaign that says: Person is created filled out form = lead gen form fills out form = lead gen form and then a flow step to change some data values Issue: The leads that are created via API lead gen form do not flow through this campaign. I dont understand why? The campaign should check if a person is created and filled out the form then do the flow step but it does not work.   If I create a filter campaign with the same criteria I find all of the newly created leads and can perform the flow. I dont understand why this does not work with a trigger?

It would be helpful if there was a Core data element that returned the value of the Launch library "Name". This would make it easy to set the value to an Analytics eVar for debugging purposes. We name our libraries using the Major.Minor.Patch versioning convention and it would be helpful to know which Launch library a website visitor was using. Sometimes after a new library is published it seems like some visitors may have the old library cached in their browser. If we could capture the library "Name" as an eVar, we would know this for sure.  

This is something most Adobe users do not know nor expect nor does it make much sense: Marketing channels have a rolling 30-day expiration, whether a channel was touched or not. Tracking codes have an expiration based on when the variable was defined. https://helpx.adobe.com/in/analytics/kb/comparing-tracking-codes-and-marketing-channels.html "Expiration differences: Marketing channels have a rolling 30-day expiration, whether a channel was touched or not. Tracking codes have an expiration based on when the variable was defined. For example:The campaign variable is set to expire after 30 days; your marketing channel visitor engagement expiration is also set to 30 days.A user arrives on your site via the tracking code promotion3, then leaves.They come back three weeks later without a tracking code or marketing channel, and exit the site again.Another three weeks later, they come back without a tracking code or marketing channel, then make a purchase.The user ultimately made a

Description - The current ACS APIs available does not provide a way to fetch the deliveries and workflows informationWhy is this feature important to you -1. There are some features like heat map which is available in ACC but not in ACS and it can be built if the workflows execution information can be fetched through API in Firefly project but the API isn't available2. Currently in ACS there's not quite a lot flexibility in terms of what information can be displayed (limited to available dimensions) on Dynamic Reports. A lot of times it's needed to generate a custom report about the deliveries like number of sent, delivered, bounced, opened, clicked messages, etc. and display that on the UI outside ACS similar to dynamic reports. There isn't any API related to Deliveries.How would you like the feature to work - Exposing Deliveries and Workflows data via APICurrent Behaviour - API does not exist for workflows and deliveries.

Content Fragments are now used widely in AEM project majorly in headless and hybrid model. But still there are some features that can be added in content fragment that can make it more valuable:1) Use of Multifield. Currently the multifield works fine when there is one level of child but for some cases we require multlevel multi field that does not work fine as it works in the component level.2) Live Copy Inheritance in Content Fragment is not supported.3) Asset level versioning shows the version number , it should also show the date of version so this will help to track the exact revision as well.4) Dialog level clientlibs instead of override dam.cq one for dialog level events.

We'd like the ability to add/customize the sections in our project templates, then have those sections carry over to the projects that are created from the template. My understanding is this is not an option in NWE currently. (The sections can be added, but do not carry over to the resulting projects.) This would help us reduce the amount of dashboards pinned at the Layout level and allow us to be more selective about which sections show on different project types.

Most of the clients that we are working with use expense object to create PO or Invoice. They would like this information to be printed. Currently, only project, tasks and Issues are available to be printed. We would like the expense custom forms to be able to be printed.

We'd like to see a way to restrict access to view more sensitive data based on your role setup in Campaign.  For example, birthdate is not something we would want everyone to be able to view.

Ability to make duration changes on active projects without email notifications or having to change status from inactive to active. Users are complaining when they receive a second 'active' email that it is confusing.

Hi,A nice feature to implement will be a standard  "trash-bin" functionality for AEM Assets. Right now we have customization (implemented on AEM 6.3) as described herehttps://kbwebconsult.com/2020/07/21/the-enigma-of-aem-apache-sling-filters/ Best,Krass 

We would like to replace our web images with the google WebP format https://developers.google.com/speed/webp It would be great if webp could be supported in AEM Assets in near future.

As different client has different data archival standards, we need to create archival process for various clients. In AEM, since the content goes into the repository, anything that comes inside the repo becomes a data that is moved across environments. Moreover, we need to have a process for content editors for moving archived content to some other tree or space and to keeping the content tree clean and only with needed content. It will be great if you can support an archival strategy OOTB. The features I look for in this feature is1. Easy to manage from authoring experience2. Reduced to a small size3. It should be outside the repository so that we don't need to move that as content in the repo.4. We should be able to search through the metadata5. We should be able to retrieve the content with some action.

We have a request queue which receives requests for new pieces of software development for our platform from across several teams. We can convert an issue from this queue into a task, but cannot tag an issue to a task which has already been independently created in the development workflow. In this scenario, we wouldn't want to create a new task because it already exists, but having the ability to link that issue to the existing task would be of great benefit. Thaks!

Allow the system admin to add filters and add sort by to the home my work list area.

I would like to have a report to show how many forms are using 1.0. With the depreciation of forms 1.0, it would be great to be able to see how many forms are 1.0 in an instance. To be able to create a smart list or a report would help.

This is a feature request to improve the experience of perusing a List of Leads in a Smart List.Current challege: It's a time consuming process to examine a list of Leads in Marketo.  When you scroll to the bottom of a smart list (50 Leads) you must click on the ? symbol to get to next 50 Leads.  There's no option to display more than 50 Leads.Request: As opposed to clicking to the next page in the smart list, it would be a lot easier if the next 50 Leads automatically loaded.  This is simply borrowing the idea that many blog sites (like http://laughingsquid.com employ) so that it appears there is an endless stream of content.  I'd like to see an endless stream of Leads, especially if my smart list returns a few thousand results.In my opinion, this would make for an improved experience when wading through a long list of Leads.

I beleive this might already be on the roadmap, but really would find it helpful to be able to subscribe to a smart list or smart list (ideally to have an excel or csv pulled and emailed on a regular basis) - would also like to be able to share a "custom view" so that all of the relevant field information can be shared with other users that view the smart list within Marketo.

It would be great if you could set up Smart List Subscriptions to send on a specific date and at a certain time of day.

it would be nice if documents/proofs load could be previewed without having to download the item or open in WF Proof. The same can be said if images are loaded (jpg/pdf).