Product Communities

While /rest/v1/stats/usage.json can return API usage from different API users over the course of the day, there's no way today to see a subscription's daily request limit (enforced or purchased). As a result, if you wanted to scale a program to use a certain ratio of calls relative to the subscription, you must first retrieve the number in the UI.   Having API access and exposure to the request limit in addition to daily calls would be a major win for Marketo integration developers, as proper scales and checks could be dynamically built into applications.

There are many integrations out there and many of them now expect that people can call REST endpoints with the proper method.As an example, we have an integration right now where we can POST to create a person in another system, which returns an ID. Ideally, we would like to PUT to the user record to do an update. This is currently not supported by Marketo, the only options are GET and POST. A few old timey servers out there support ?_method=DELETE or ?_method=POST on the URL of a POST, however that number is very few.Please add additional methods to webhooks so we can take advantage of additional, modern integrations.

This case is about https://one.workfront.com/s/support - not related to a Workfront productI previously filed this and was told "the team is working on it".The search on the right is updated with *EVERY KEY STROKE* in Subject and Description fieldsI tend to type fast so i notice a lag : my typing is actually blocked due to requests to "https://one.workfront.com/s/sfsites/aura?r=124&aura.ApexAction.execute=1" on every key stroke.I get around it by blocking those requests manually :/Unbelievably poor UX from Salesforce. please get this fixed.I filed a case which was immediately closed. https://one.workfront.com/s/case/5004X00001Xjhx1/support-turn-off-refreshing-the-search-on-create-a-case-page

Hi, In the newest UI, you can filter for approved and/or draft. It would be really nice if there was a way to search for MSI templates as well.

It would be nice to have a pop-up alert when trying to activate a program. The pop-up would provide a summary of the program setup and the size of audience impacted. To activate the program and send out the email, you would need to click on the Confirm button. This would draw the attention of the user who would have to double check the settings of the program before activating it. This alert would also inform of errors, such as non-active flows, preventing the normal execution of the email.

Users have observed that 'deleted' proof comments still appear in subsequent decision notification emails. Emails indicating that a proof was approved, also contain comments requesting changes, where those comments were actually deleted, which can only create confusion. The person receiving thje email has no choice but to contact the decision maker and clarify their intent... "Do you want those changes, or is it approved, as is?"Workfront Support state that this is by design, but this seems completely illogical. At the very least, if the deleted comments must be included, they should be annotated as 'Deleted' to give the correct context.

Just recently I have logged several 'Support Requests' where investigation of undesired behaviour is explained as being part of the planned design. Each time I am advised to lodge an Innovation Idea, which means I have to srtar from scratch to lodge as an Innovation Idea.There should be a way of 'converting a 'Support Request' into an 'innovation idea' with the click of a button.

Please add a "Project Owner" field on the templates. Most of the templates we have created have the same project owner. One person schedules all the projects, so they have access to edit the templates as the template owner, but there should be another field called "Project Owner" where each time you use that template, it automatically assigns that project to the person listed in the "Project Owner" field.

Would be great to offer more than just square shapes for annotating in the Proof Viewer. We know the freehand option is available but like to add at minimum circles as an option.

It would be nice to have some kind of loading bar inside of Workfront. There is no clear indicator of progress that the Workfront Page is loading. A spinning Wheel or a Progress bar would be very helpful. We have other applications that have a progress screen or a bar that shows it's loading when something is clicked on.

Within the Experience Platform Debugger, it is easy to replace the Launch embed code with a different one, but any time I do this, the default code is including the async keyword, while or websites have the embed code loaded in sync.Therefore I always have to remove the "async" keyword in the embed code before I apply the replacement when I'm testing. Would it be possible to have respect the sync/async way of loading of the current embed code as the default for replacement?

We have set up a PTO request queue in Workfront. The employee submits a request for time off and it automatically routes to their manager for approval. The manager is required to respond within 2 days of the request being submitted. Our admin team audits these requests to make sure that managers are approving/denying within that time-frame. Since the new approval layout/look & feel rolled out, we are no longer able to see the actual name of who is supposed to be approving the item now. All we can see is that the request is pending approval from "primary contact manager". It would be EXTREMELY helpful for the requests to show the individuals name who the request is pending approval from. The requests also show "Unassigned" so it throws our employees off when they can't see that the request is pending approval from their manager (with their name spelled out). See attached pictures. We would like to have the manager's name appear again instead of just s

Recorded (simulated live) webinars from #GoToWebinar currently do not integrate with MKTO because the Launchpoint integration between GoToWebinar and Marketo does not utilize version 2 of the GoToWebinar API and v2 is required for recorded (simulated live) webinars.Recorded webinars are super beneficial for reusing content and/or having the same webinar run at different times so more people can attend. I need Marketo to be able to pull attendee data from GTW so that they can get into our follow-up programs.

Be able to color code the Gantt chart of a project list to show phases of the project. To reduce real estate, clients frequently request to see a Gantt chart of all their projects with them colored by project phase (i.e. Discover, Creative Development, Review, Launch). Solution Idea: In MS Project, there is a view in the specific project where you can assign which tasks will be on the Gantt line and what color they should be. This then rolls up to any portfolio reporting you do. This might also work with Milestone Paths if they are attached to the Parent Tasks.

This is only a small technical idea for a specific use case, but can be very annoying. If you switch the recurrence off on a recurring batch campaign, but need to restart it again after a while (or activate it after an instance copy), the first date the campaign is set to run is still set to the first time it was set to run originally, so you manually have to update that start date to a date in the future. It would be really helpful if Marketo can reset to the first possible future date the campaign can run at the originally scheduled time of day.

Description -I am wondering what the ETA is for having feature parity of viewing reports in Target to look at Targeted vs. Control for the main primary metric for an Auto-Target test when we select Analytics as the reporting source.Why is this feature important to you - This is a big issue for us b/c often we are selecting a Target metric (like clicks) as the optimization goal for the Auto-Target test and we can’t easily replicate that in analytics.The Target report for the Primary goal (optimization goal) when we select analytics as the reporting source - it does not give us the rolled up view of Targeted vs. Control like when we use Target as the reporting source.How would you like the feature to work - Would like to view Targeted vs. Control rolled up view in Target reports when we select Analytics as the reporting source.   Current Behaviour -

Hi Adobe,It will be great to have some year over year comparison visualizations option available in Adobe Analytics Workspace as shown in the below image. This will help users/execs better understand and compare the trends over the same time previous years. Currently we are having to extract Adobe data in to BI tools like Domo or Tableau to build such charts.Thanks,Srujana- https://rnd.aspencore.com/eetimes-redesign-adtest/

When downloading a proof summary or choosing to print a proof summary the file naming convention is general and does not readily identify the file. When choosing the print option the file is named Workfront Proof.When choosing to download PDF print summary the file is name with the proof reference ID that cannot be search in Workfront.I would like to explore the possibility to have the proof document name with version number to easily identify the proof in the file name without having to manually name the file. Additionally it would be helpful to provide a Workfront document URL in the footer that will direct reviewers back to the actual proof in Workfront.

When using Program Tokens in an email subject line MSI will show {{my.Subject Line}} instead of the actual value of the token. That defeats the purpose of using tokens.

Would like to customize Project Details - add a field that will display on the opening page of the project:

Issue: the date picker is literally translated from English. M | T | W | T | F | S | S. Chinese Traditional is translated correctly (i.e. M = letter M or T = letter T); however, this is not localised; so users in Taiwan do not recognise what the letters M | T | W | T | F | S | S refer to in their local language Chinese Traditional other than the literal letters.Solution: translate the date picker so the abbreviated days apply to the local market, or don't translate them.

Issue: we receive a number of requests in the US, EMEA and APAC regarding the ability to assess how many hours are worked in the office vs. remotely.Potential solution: implement a checkbox in the comments functionality to allow users to toggle an office or remote option. There could be a setting in the Timesheet Profile to make the selection of this mandatory.

Issue: Some EMEA markets have to follow legislation that restricts working overtime without a formal agreement.Solution: option in the Timesheet Profile to limit the number of hours a user can enter per day (i.e. 8 hours per day or 10 hours per day).

Issue: Some EMEA markets have to follow legislation that restricts working weekends without a formal agreement.Solution A: general option to disable users in a Timesheet Profile to enter time on a weekend.Solution B: option in the user profile to disable weekend working (i.e. not able to enter hours on a Saturday or Sunday).

Add the Filter on this Page function that is on the project tab to the issues tab,‚