Product Communities

Previous submissionhttps://one.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000PSdFAAW/detailSelecting this option"Send an invite email to this person"removes the optionOnly Allow SAML 2.0 AuthenticationWhen I create SSO accounts, our users do not get a much needed welcome email. Can you please allow both options to be selectable.Thank you!Drew

It seems not to be possible to display Document-specific custom forms on the Details screen of the document. Users have to navigate to the Custom Forms option on the left-hand nav bar and then select the form. Even then, it appears only on that section (Custom Forms). All other objects (can't promise I've checked every one) allow the display of Custom Forms on the object details screen and Documents should be the same.

Many SCRUM teams do not work with parent stories and subtask. SCRUM teams should be able to choose whether the storyboard shows horizontal swimlanes that are organized by story or if the board shows more like the KanBan view where there are only vertical swimlanes organized by task status. Our teams are losing too much screen real estate when grouping in horizontal, per story, swim lanes. It is common for an iteration to have hundreds of tasks for a team that spread across 30 different projects that each have multiple parent/subtask structures. It is impossible for users to quickly find their task within the story board due to the lack of search functionality in the board and the breaking down into horizontal swimlanes.

When proofing a file with more than one page in Proof HQ, the filename needs to be more prominent. As you can see from the attached images, little to none of the filename is immediately visible, making it difficult to work out which one we're reviewing, without hovering over the image thumbnailSee attached for more context

(Note that Campaigns = Projects)We have recently discovered the Campaigns I'm On/Campaigns I Own buttons that can be activated in a Layout Template (refer to Case Number 00260023).Currently this filter provides ALL campaigns and it is not possible to modify the filter to exclude 'Complete' campaigns.Is it possible to modify the underlying filter to exclude 'Complete' campaigns?

Currently, when a user has Show System Updates turned off, any user comments that are replying to a system update will also be hidden. We have experienced cases when a Designer receives a comment from a stakeholder but she can't find or see it because the stakeholder replied to a system update and the designer has Show System Updates turned off.

Imagine a world where you can combine comments from one proof to another seamlessly. In our model, we sometimes need to route the same projects to 2 depts at the same time. The ability to import comments from 1 proof to another would be game-changing.My ideal scenario will be if we're could import comments like you could combine comments from a PDF would be amazing.Another great advancement would be if Proof HQ would sort comments based on placement vs order of when the comment was made. Formatting text into proof could also save time and reduce the error rate too, especially in creating long reference blocks with itals, etc.

In the most recent update, 21.1, Workfront removed the ability to copy and paste the direct URL and share it with others. Users now have to navigate to the "Share Path" button with is extra clicks and confusing for our every day planners and our requestors. Additionally, this is not standard with how you share project, task, or document URLs, making the UX very confusion and inconsistent. Let's bring back the the URL path in the URL bar where it belongs. Thanks!

Today, there is no automatic way to set a Salesforce campaign that should be linked with a Program using only the REST API. However, when querying program information, both the linked sfdcId and its associated name are displayed. Would it be possible to update createProgramRequest/updateProgramRequest  so an SFDC Campaign ID value can be passed? Ideally, there'd be an option a la the UI to auto-create an SFDC campaign in addition to setting a predefined value, but even having the ability to link pre-existing campaigns would be tremendously helpful. 

Propose a toggle within the software to prevent this from occurring. This could be implemented in simple ways, such as the software simply prompting the user when they click the 'Open Proof' link with the question "Do you want to view the document or approve the proof?" then the software can direct them to existing code rather than having to reinvent the current code. This could be implemented in other ways as well without the need to reinvent the current code.For organizations that have tightly controlled and highly auditable proofing approvals, the auto-creation of the workfront approval stage when a user views a proof can create considerable extra work and audit risk.

We need to be able to disable daily digest emails. At the moment we are manually disabling them every time a new user is created. Its a workaround, but very manual and time consuming

There should be an option to view records that failed to perform a particular activity such as if we want to see all records fail due to a sync error.

description Today we can send attachments to recipients using standard ACC functionality:Attaching files | Adobe CampaignHaving an OOTB functionality that would upload automatically files configured as attachments to a public ressource and create automatically the links(ex: https://<%= external.attachment[0] %> to access them would be a great feature This OOTB functionality is important at different level:1- sending attachments in emails is tricky for deliverability purpose: depending of the attachment size, the nature of the attachment, the ISP of the recipient, the amount of emails... It can badly affect your different ISP reputation.2- it affects your throughput as more an email is heavy, more the MTA takes time to process it... If you add the point 1, it can slow down your entire platform sendings during hours (retry feature)3- the ecological footprint created when downloading a file through HTTP is smaller than sending this file through SMTP (email). For compa

When you are creating a project, you only have the option to set the Planned Start Date or the Planned Completion Date and then the rest is calculated by the project timeline.I would like the ability to set manual Start and Completion dates for my project and have it not be based on the tasks.

I would like a way to pull which email notifications were actually sent for projects and different items. This would really help if it were in a report form when users say that notifications are not being sent out.

The system has many standard views/filters/groupings like Projects I'm On/Assigned to Me etc.You are unable to edit the standard filter. Any changes you make will have to be saved as a new filter. I think admins should be able to edit the standard lists without creating a new one in the system.

Right now adobe client console does an api call to list all the data like data schemas, campaigns, deliveries and input forms.Most of the adobe campaign server are secured to have access via VPN and many time we get error and slow response resulting in crashing. I think it will be great If there is an option for work on Offline data. Where we can browse the campaigns make the changes and then sync the data with the server. I know the downside of doing this will be to sync the 2 different versions of the same campaigns and the offline data cache size. But It will be really great from use-ability perspective. 

Sometime the Alert emails or any other informational email should be going to multiple recipient, We can achieve it through recipients which will send individual emails or we can send it to DLs, but there are needs from few projects I came across to have the cc/bcc in place. It would be very nice to have this feature in Campaign classic.

Could you add the option to have a quarterly subscription cadence for smart lists?

It would be great if it were possible to set up the hierarchy of who could grant access to requests for more access to tasks, issues, and projects. Like if the admin could create the hierarchy of object creator, object owner, parent object creator/owner, parent of parent object, etc.I feel like that would help make some of the access requests more manageable because they'd be going to the right audience more often.

We have several reports that must be shared with new users for them to then make a favorite. Wouldn't it be nice to automatically set favorites for a specific layout? This way when a new user gets assigned a layout they have favorites already established.

The current document for A4T says that every metric is available, including any custom or calculated metrics that are built-in in Analytics. However, when we select the calculated metrics as the primary goal for an activity in Target, the lift and confidence calculations are not available in Target and Analytics.Edit: While this idea is being considered for future, it would be awesome if Adobe can share how to build a calculated metric in Adobe Analytics for confidence interval calculation. I understand that the calculated metric builder has some advanced formula and functions but how to use them for the confidence calculation?

Hi Marketo Team, We have been trying to find a solution for URL links with dynamic parameters (i.e. some of the parameters which use Velocity Email Tokens) which cannot be tracked. Attempting to track them would result on the Email Token code not being evaluated. Will it be possible to have a solution for the same in next updates of the platform. It would really solve major setbacks and help us track leads and their behavior. Thanks & Regards Kushal Arya

We have a few standard Issues configured that we apply to our projects using the Queue Setup. These Issues use custom forms to ensure consistency in the data that needs to be provided, depending on the type selected. For example, in our case we have one for Action Items and one for Status Reports. When the user needs to provide either of these for a project, they simply navigate to the Issues tab, click the new issue button, and select they type of Issue that they need to add. After they select the type of issue, the appropriate form appears. This works great except when we get that one rogue resource that uses the "Add More Issues" link at the bottom of the Issue tab, instead of using the New Issue button located at the top of the Issues tab. The "Add More Issues" link at the bottom of the page does not honor/recognize the Queue Topics that are available for use on the project. Only the "New Issues" button does. It would be so helpful if we had the

Hello friends, I think everyone who works with Adobe Analytics has run into a situation where we would like to combine the value of two or more dimensions into one value for reporting. If you have an eVar for City and a prop for Country, it would be awesome to be able to combine both to a value like "City in Country", just like a Calculated Metric. If it only works for dimensions on the same hit we would already have a lot of value. Today, I solve this by tracking the value in a combined way and utilize Classification Rules to separate them afterwards. This works for new implementation but does not help for historical data or new use cases. Please vote for this idea if you want it as well! Best,Frederik