Product Communities

Hello!We are facing the challenge of making our controlling even better with Workfront. When evaluating projects, the job levels (principal, senior, expert, junior, trainee) play a major role, since recorded hours have to be put in the right context.Unfortunately there are no job levels in the system. So we would have to create countless job roles, which of course would also have an impact on reports and many other areas.Is there anyone else facing this challenge? @Workfront Product Team: Is there anything on the roadmap?ThxStephan

The Sales Owner fields are shown in the Person's Info tab as Sales Owner. When leveraging these fields as tokens in emails, they are shown as Lead Owner instead of Sales Owner. If you are not aware of the fact these two things are the same, you can spend a good amount of time figuring out which token to use. Can these token names please be aligned with the naming of the fields in all other places?

Need to have a possibility to associate KANBAN WIP limit to # of hours/points instead of # of tasks/stories.

日本語の環境でMarketoを利用している状況で、プログラムインストールをする際に必要になるカスタムフィールドの作成を日本語名称でも作成を可能にしていただきたい。 現在は、プログラムインストールがすべて英語になっているため、カスタムフィールドも英語で作成が必要となり、日本語で作成してしまった場合、プログラムインストールができず、改めて英語でカスタムフィールドを作成する必要があります。カスタムフィールドを無駄に作成することになります。 日本語環境で使っているユーザーがもう少しプログラムインストールを利用しやすくなるために、改善していただければ幸いです。   よろしくお願いいたします。

The mapping names of the CSV Module are displayed as "Column undefined" rather than "Column 1". I'm seeing this when the output of the CSV Module is an input to a Data Store module but this may be occuring in other areas as well. This was submitted to support as Case Number 00287974. They reported that this behavior was "Working as Expected" and that a report should be filed in the Innovation Lab.I'd rather view this as "Column 1"

It is very useful when assigning work to be able to see and sort the unassigned work by the project priorities (ie portfolio priority field) so that the most important work gets assigned first and foremost. Thus it would be very useful to have the portfolio priority for the project displayed for the unassigned work with the capability to sort the unassigned work by the project's portfolio priority

Exporting a Report With About 11K Projects' Items to Excel xlsx Generates 504 Timeout Web Server Error. Many attempts can result in getting the same 504 error. Eventually, the export does complete.Performance is an issue with NWE. Here is another place where Development should improve the product.

it would be great if there was an option to change the color (colour) of bars in bar graphs when running SiteCatalyst, and subsequently when these reports are saved as bookmarks, reportlets in dashboards, emailed, exported in docs etc. In a stacked bar graph, this control would change the color of the first item.At present, I have a dashboard which contains many bar graphs, all of which are blue, making comprehension of individual reportlets difficult.6-10 well chose color options would be great.

PART 11 -- ELECTRONIC RECORDS; ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES Subpart C--Electronic Signatures Sec. 11.100 General requirements. (a) Each electronic signature shall be unique to one individual and shall not be reused by, or reassigned to, anyone else. (b) Before an organization establishes, assigns, certifies, or otherwise sanctions an individual's electronic signature, or any element of such electronic signature, the organization shall verify the identity of the individual. (c) Persons using electronic signatures shall, prior to or at the time of such use, certify to the agency that the electronic signatures in their system, used on or after August 20, 1997, are intended to be the legally binding equivalent of traditional handwritten signatures. (1) The certification shall be submitted in paper form and signed with a traditional handwritten signature, to the Office of Regional Operations (HFC-100), 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857. (2) Persons using electronic signatures shall, upon

I find it very unfortunate that events in the Activity History of a person are not arranged in logical order - if they have the same time stamp. See e.g. here:     The two Change Data Value events are the result/response of the "Call Webhook" event, yet they appear underneath it. I'd love to see that changed.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Add the ability to remove an asset from a Collection in more ways than just via the Remove button inside the Collection. Use-case: We have Collections with lots of assets and we need to regularly remove assets from Collections. Current/Experienced Behavior: If you have a Collection with a lot of assets, it is too difficult to scroll to the asset you want in order to remove it from the Collection -- due to lazy loading, it can take a very long time to scroll to the correct asset. Improved/Expected Behavior: The Remove button should also exist inside each asset and/or be accessible from a search for the asset. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.8 Customer-name/Organization name: Securian Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

AEM documentation makes it clear that Hobbes.js is deprecated.  It says to use Selenium.  However, nowhere in the documentation can I find HOW to use Selenium within AEM and there are no examples.  When I look for examples of using Selenium, as example to test AEM Editor mode, I'm directed to Bobcat.  It seems like AEM should provide a tutorial if they suggest Selenium?

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: It would be good if there is an ability to filter assets within collections Use-case: Filtering collections within collections Current/Experienced Behavior: There is no way to filter assets now within collections Improved/Expected Behavior: It's going to be easier to find assets within the collections Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Proquire Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: "List View (all items)" option is available when browsing folders. However, it's missing when looking at the search results and when browsing a collection. Adding this option  would eliminate scrolling through lazy load in order to select all. Use-case: Sometimes bulk changes / downloads need to be done to all items in a collection. Inability to list all assets in a collection forces user to endlessly scroll through lazy load in order to select all assets.  Current/Experienced Behavior: "List View (all items)" option is not available in search results or in collections Improved/Expected Behavior: "List View (all items)" option is available in search results or in collections, just as it is available for folder browsing. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 6.5.8 Customer-name/Organization name: Wakefern Food Corp Screenshot (if applicable): Update the toggle between ca

We would like the default selection for a field to be a custom form setting and not a custom field setting, just like required field logic works. For example, we have a "Region" field that we use across many different custom forms for reporting purposes. If that Region field is used on a form that is specifically for Northern Europe, we would like to have the selection default to "Northern Europe" only on that particular form, not across all forms.

Please use the parameter label instead of the name.We have a large library of custom fields that follows a naming convention that would not make sense to most of our users.The naming convention is required to keep control and avoid duplicates.We also avoid changing the name to prevent reports/views/groupings/filters from breaking.When building reports, we would prefer the chart pulls the 'label' vs. 'name'.

Description -In Analysis Workspace, users may want to define constant values (like a yearly sales goal or revenue-per-order threshold) and use them in multiple places, like multiple projects, segments, or calculated metrics. However, the only current way to achieve this is through calculated metrics, which come with a bunch of disadvantages:They can't be used in segmentsIf they are used in other calculated metrics, they are copied instead of referenced. Therefore, changes to the original metric will not be reflected in other metrics where the original has been usedThis makes this approach unmanageable for values that might change in the future, which can be especially true for sales goals.Why is this feature important to you -Avoid inconsistency in reporting and extreme maintenance overhead when working with goals or other, widely used metrics.How would you like the feature to work -In addition to the already available component types, introduce a "Constant" type of element. We should

Description -Creating segments and calculated metrics in Analytics/Analysis Workspace is, naturally, a lot of work for complex ideas. Here is the summary I recently created for my post about the Linearity Indicator:As both a user of Analysis Workspace and content creator, I would like to make it as easy as possible for me and others to confidently replicate or adapt the segments and metrics I've invested a lot of time in. Ideally, we would have the same "summary" view for segments too and be able to click into the field, then edit or copy/paste the content (a bit like formulas in Excel).Why is this feature important to you -Drive user adoption through easier workflows for complex scenarios. Increase maturity through more advanced use cases.How would you like the feature to work - Bring the Summary view from Calculated Metrics over to SegmentsWhen a user clicks into the Summary, turn it into an editable text field that allows to copy or edit/replace the content. Once the user click

In Analysis workspace reports we are seeing low traffic data but the customer does not want to see these data in reports.We are seeing low traffic for Evar 26.Can you change the threshold limits for Low traffic to include all data? Basically, we want to remove the threshold.

Description - Make permissions related to virtual report suite (VRS) management (create, edit, delete) be consistent with those for standard report suites.Why is this feature important to you - To be able to create/edit/delete VRS, you need to be a (Product Profile?) Administrator. But that is a very powerful role that some organisations may be hesitant to assign to the users just to be able to manage VRS (e.g. an analytics agency/vendor user). On the other hand, you can have the necessary permissions to create/edit/delete any report suite settings and yet still be unable to manage VRS. (Just take a moment to appreciate the breadth of that discrepancy…)How would you like the feature to work - VRS permissions are consistent with standard report suite permissions, i.e. create/edit/delete permissions, especially without the need to be a (Product Profile?) Administrator.Current Behaviour - An Analytics user can have permissions to create/edit/delete report suite settings, including pr

Enhance the Data Insertion API that it supports the use of Supplemental Data ID (SDID) We are promoting our server-side interfaces diligently. But if the tracking with AA is taking place on the server side and the Data Insertion API for Target does not support SDID our customers are not able to use A4T.

Currently, screen size data is pre-determined by the device's user agent to populate mobile reports, and as such it's currently impossible to obtain screen resolution without additional implementation as this help page details - https://helpx.adobe.com/analytics/kb/comparing-iphone-device-versions.htmlThis means that all iPhone screen sizes are reported as 320x480As such, the accuracy of this report is largely brought into question, especially when Apple mobile products contribute to such a large portion of mobile traffic.The data capture method for this report should be looked at to improve the accuracy of the data being captured without the need to implement additional eVars to capture screen sizes for specific devices.

When cloning an email blast program, the only thing that does not automatically update but should be considered an internal program reference is the selection of which program the reports should refer to. With a Default program, the cloned version does have the settings of the reports changed over correctly, but for an email blast program this needs to be swapped manually. Can this be updated to the cloned program as well?

Days marked as Time-Off should not be allowed for inputting hours, to be shown in-active/grey-out in TimeSheets. This gives the valid hours-input to the WF system and helps for effective resource management.

Clicking into an email notification from Workfront doesn't link the system. Does this have to do with SAML authentication or SSO? Update From Workfront Support: Workfront reports these are one of the drawbacks using SSO. If a user is not previously authenticated to Workfront (before the timeout), the system doesn't know if it is an internal, or external user, so it redirects them to the SSO system for authentication. This is really no way for the system to distinguish of the usr should be an SSO user for or outside user until they type in credentials. Again, they've suggested for this to be included as an enhancement request from our end.