Product Communities

It would be great to have the capability to send an email program immediately. Often (particularly in the real estate industry) emails are sent on a conjunctional basis meaning two competing agencies send the same email at the same time. Given client approval is often received at the last minute, a 15-minute delay to send an email campaign can often be hugely detrimental.

OOO settings for proof users that allow them not to be assigned during the specified OOO timeframe and if someone attempt to assign a proof review to that user for that timeframe they receive a note that person is OOO and to assign a different specified user.

We can use data collected within Adobe Analytics to show a data driven view of how customers move around our site, whether in the Flow workspace visualisation or after we extract the data.I'd like this ACTUAL view of behaviour to be overlayed onto a visual sitemap of our site, generated from our robots.txt file possibly, to show the difference between the actual and (possibly) intended view. This could highlight areas where the navigation of the site needs to be updated or redesigned. It would be especially useful if the link prominance/placement could be incorporated to show when customers are using your site in a way you don't expect.At the moment we have to painstakingly draw out our intended flow on the site, and then manually add the % onward flow, and rejig if it doesn't fit, which is a pain. Would be great to automate.

A Report that shows multiple aspects of one project in a single report format - Project Name Project Description Project Owner Today's Date Milestone Chart - the color coded one with the status and dates Upcoming tasks Open Issues Open Risks Current Update - editable! Budget vs. Actual Ability to put in a color status for how the project is doing on the various elements of the project: Budget Resources Schedule Technology Scope Stakeholder Involvement Confidential notice at bottom of export

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Generic Data Import Tool Use-case: Import data from external CMS Current/Experienced Behavior: Not Available Improved/Expected Behavior:   Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Customer-name/Organization name:   Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Last Entry Date on Specific Custom Fields What is it? o Custom fields are used to enter a type of update specific the reporting team or group. This feature would create a timestamp record when a change is made to a specific custom field, similar to Last Note Entry Date. This data will be used to create aging reports, identifying which projects haven’t had custom status field updates over a period of time (I.e. No Updates in 7 Days, No Updates in 14 days, etc.) Why do we need it? o Program Management is currently tracking approximately 400 projects with nearly 450 contributors. Based on business units area contributors are required to enter updates into specific custom fields (I.e. Dept Summary, Product Summary, Status Headline, Problems/Notes, etc.). We need a way to quickly determine when a specific status field has been updated in order to take appropriate action. Currently, we only see timestamped changes in the running Updates Feed, which makes an entry when any project attri

We would like to know if anything is removed from a project. Also, we would like to be able to have a plan for restoring deleted documents past the 30 day mark.

Description - Currently there is the option to 'Add all changed resources'.  I think a useful feature would be to be able to import 'All changed resources from a specific library' into another one.  Why is this feature important to you - Working at an enterprise company means a lot of rules get changed often.  Not all of these rules need to be released at the same time.  This feature would save me time and manual clicking.  We build individual libraries while working on a project, and then 'merge' them all together into a release library.  It is a pain point to manually do this process. How would you like the feature to work - Next to the 'Add all changed resources' button, add a button that says something along the lines of 'Add  all resources from a library'.  This would then show a modal with a dropdown and all of the libraries on that property.  Upon selecting a library, a confirmation submit would be clicked, and all of the or

Some forms have a lot of required fields and you can't always easily see which you missed when filling out, and the request can't be saved without it. Would like that they get highlighted in some way so it's easy to find what was missed.

Data Feed have FTP, SFTP and S3 destinations to schedule reports on recurring basis but Data Warehouse only have FTP. It will be great if we incorporate SFTP and S3 destinations in Data Warehouse!

We have tends of thousands of Projects in our system for our workgroup. Sometimes I have to export so I can stick in Excel to run formulas to compare data. However, I have to export page by page and that gets really, really tedious if you have say 30k at 2k at a time. For some Reports exporting the Summary works, but while I don't need to see all of the Projects in my view, an export "All Results" or something similar would be really, really helpful (and time saving!)

For Enterprise accounts, we would like to have the ability to enable the Workfront Proof icon, via Layout Templates, to appear in the Main Menu for only selected users vs. all users. In addition, we would like to be able to enable this icon without having to provide the users with a Workfront System Administrator license. We would like the selected users to be able to create and manage proof Workflows and proof Groups without giving them access to all Workfront instance and Workfront Proof settings.

In WLB, my Tasks under Projects currently appear in alphabetical order vs task due date. I don't believe this was the case until recently. I understand the alphabetical order is now by default however I think the view of my tasks should be by due date of tasks. This makes is a lot easier to scan quickly.

I think web SDK streaming data  should also be shown as a source under system view in Sources section of AEP UI. This will give a complete picture of all data in sources. Currently web SDK is not included in system view.   

Description -Allow for segmentation by specific combinations of dimensions and metrics. Why is this feature important to you -This allows for deeper analysis based on specific visitor behaviour, for example, segment visitors who viewed a specific product page 5 times. How would you like the feature to work -Example:A visitor can visit many pages, e.g. A, B, C, etc. I want to segment only those visitors who visited Page A but had only <= 2 Page View of Page A in their visitor lifetime. I.e.Jack: viewed Page A 1 time in his lifetime —> include in the segmentJill: viewed Page A 2 times in her lifetime –> include in the segmentDonald: viewed Page A 3 times in his lifetime –> don’t include in the segment Current Behaviour -The above is not possible. Segmentation can be done by a dimension or a metric, but not a combination of dimensions and metrics. E.g. in the above example, the Page View condition will match based on all page views from the visitor, not jus

More and more organisations are working with self-managing teams. Each individual in this team needs to be able to allocate their planned hours to days in the upcoming week. Therefore, Workers need to be able to allocate their own planned hours either on the Workload Balancer, or on a project/task level.

Hello! Our social team uses Hootsuite for a variety of reasons that WF can't replicate (reporting, literally publishing to channels, etc.) but it causes redundant work. We have a social calendar in WF and have the publish task due date in our social projects as the date it's publishing via Hootsuite, but it's redundant work. But need to have in WF for visibility into how social is fitting in with our related projects. I'm seeking votes for a Hootsuite WF connector! I'd like a way where we can have tasks we choose (like our publish task) can integrate with Hootsuite, so we only need to 'schedule' in Hootsuite once, via WF and it update in Hootsuite.

I would love if this community had a mobile app. Would make it so easy to stay up to date on product discussions & questions vs. logging in each time.  (I did search the Apple App Store and couldn’t find one - but if there IS one I missed send it my way!) (on a sidenote - when I try and login via my phone browser it always blocks “sign in” and instead prompts me to create an account - so the only fix I’ve found is logging into a Marketo instance on my phone first, then going to community home … not sure if this is something anyone else has come across.) 

The inline issue settings that allows for + Adding More Issues at the bottom on the Issues list to become visible or not behaves different when a project gets created from a template Vs when a template gets attached to a project.When a project is made using a template, the system will use any setting in the saved in the template. That includes anything that a template can hold, from the name to the tasks, to the inline issue setting. If a project is created from scratch, it will use a set of default list of settings instead. Once a project is created, a template can be added to that project, but it will only add to areas that can hold more - additional tasks, assignments, hours, and so on. It will not change anything that is already in place, like the project name or the inline issues setting. There is not currently a way to toggle the inline issue creation in the defaults for projects

I would like to be able to add attachments to forms.I would like to be able to attach photos, drawings, etc. to the form so that subsequent negotiations, such as quotations, can proceed more smoothly. Marketo's customer support form allows for attachments, so I'm sure you understand the need for this.   フォームに添付ファイルを追加できるようにしてほしいです。 写真や図面など添付できた方が見積もりなど、その後の商談がスムーズに進むと思います。   マルケトのカスタマーサポート用フォームには添付ファイルができるようになっているので必要性は把握しているのではないでしょうか。

As an Admin, from Users Tab, we can sort & export the users' list, but generally this list gets bigger and bigger which takes more time to search for a specific user. It will be great to have a "Quick Find" box,  similar to the one that already exists to search in a List or Smart List 

It is mind boggling that the chart and matrix views of a report do not allow you to sort by the grand total! These chart & matrix views should allow you to define a sort order. For the chart, you should be able to sort by the total, or the label (ascending or descending) or a value that isn't displayed on the chart. For the Matrix view, you should be able to sort both dimensions. Either by the label, or the total.

I've recently discovered when using calcualted data expressions, such as WORKMINUTESDIFF, in text mode reporting or in calculated fields, the calculation references the instance's default schedule rather than the schedule associated with the project you're reporting on (or the project that the task/issue you're report on is in).Example:This formula in a calculated field was using the default scheduleWORKMINUTESDIFF(Project.Converted Issue Entry Date,Actual Completion Date)In order to account for the time zone and holidays of a project for one of our EU teams, I have to include the schedule ID as part of the formula in this way:WORKMINUTESDIFF(Project.Converted Issue Entry Date,Actual Completion Date,"61858bd400325ef77ff7f86977d0b5ae")

Ability to have an overview pop up in various areas (example within projects) so that admins could set instructions tailored to their specific company. This could be listed under an "i" in sections to provide more guidance to users.

Currently, if a Manager with Proof access opens up a workflow of an existing proof but is not the Owner or the Delegated Owner, she/he can still attempt to “Add a new Proof / Version” and go through the entire upload process but would be ultimately unsuccessful in generating the proof. The system should remove the ability to upload new document/version if the user is not the owner or delegate owner.