Product Communities

Is there a way to connect templates with predecessors? We do a lot of our projects in EN and FR so when creating the FR project we spend time repeatedly connecting the EN & FR projects. It would help us be more efficient if they were connected already.

To freeze the upper row where the total of hours appear in the workload balancer. If one needs to scroll down, the total of hours disappears. We need to scroll down and up and down and up again to see if planned hours in a project isn’t overloading a day.

I want "Onwer ID" prompts to include deactivated users. This prompt allows me to use WF's predictive text when typing in a name. There is a work around to change the prompt to "Owner Name" and use "contains", but I am guessing at name spellings. I want predictive text to work for both active and deactivated users. Thank you.

Straightforward idea: there are times when clients may need to pass the type of program that is used in a flow step. For example, if you have an Event program with specific channels for Roadshow and Tradeshow, you may want to stamp the channel in a field in a flow step for sales purposes. However, there's no systematic way to note a program's channel in a flow step today--instead, you must create a Program token with the same value, then reference that token.   Could a text token that outputs the channel name be created to streamline flow processing?

Description - Currently in AEP we have only schemas migration API from one sandbox to another. So, for moving my other configurations like source connectors, Dataset, Identity services etc. We need to reconfigure them again other sandboxes which eats lots of time and hamper schedule by a significant margin.Why is this feature important to you - In order to quickly develop and test in Sandbox and move to Production for quick deployment.How would you like the feature to work - if we configure every entity within one AEP sandbox and test it , post its working as per business logic. We can go ahead and create a JSON package export for that entity(like source connectors or identity services configuration etc) and we can quickly import that JSON package in other sandboxes and test in current sandbox and go for deployment. Current Behavior - Currently there is no facility except schemas in AEP. We can surely work on such feature which can quickly deploy segments and other services config

Having the ability to sort information, rows, etc using the Column Header, similar to an Excel file, would be really helpful when dealing with large lists or projects/channels with a large amount of tasks/activities. Currently you can use the search function in a "process of elimination" kind of way, but being able to filter within a column using one or more choices would be much more user-friendly.For example. if I wanted to search all projects/channels with one or more specific due dates, it would be ideal to simply click the column header and be able to select which entry/s I want to see.

We would like to have the opportunity to apply for all users the additional proof permission "Resolve Comments & Apply Actions" per default, This default setting should be applied on a user level.This should help to reduce manual effort when setting up an huge amount user accounts where this requirement is needed.

It would be great to have the ability to set the "hour type" on tasks within templates. That way, when a project is launched from the template, the hour types are already accurately set; this limits the risk that the task owner selects the wrong hour type when logging their time.

Hi - we utilize the Queue Topic and Routing Rules feature on almost every single project to make things easier for shared services team. In a recent release, a "Drafts" feature was added to the global Request area. We would love it if that functionality could also be added to the Issues area of a specific document.

Hi.  I have an idea where you can us some type of searching mechanism whether a filter criteria or a report that searches for a specific external URL used in all assets. For example, I can't recall what email that uses a specific external URL, and it would be helpful to have a searching tool to quickly scan all assets for this URL instead of going through all the emails. Thanks.

Increase Email Velocity Script Token Limit from 100KB to 200KB. 

Licensed proof users have sharing ability in Proof by tagging as a default. Unlicensed users, our clients, don't have the ability to share proofs by tagging without someone manually checking the box on proof creation. It would be nice to have the ability to set this as a default for all users, or even specific users, without relying on the proof creator to remember additional step each time.

A simple change that would help to enhance our campaign reporting when using data warehouse.

It would be helpful if the warnings stood out more. For example, the alert that a duplicate "resolving object" is about to created doesn't get noticed because the font and colors blend in. If the warning stood out more it would stop duplicate projects from being created.

Add functionality to allow program field to be selected as mandatory

Workfront should be international friendly. Dates should be supported as: DD-MMM-YYYY (03-Dec-2018) DD/MMM/YYYY (03/Dec/2018) DD/MM/YYYY (03/12/2018) DD-MM-YYYY (03-12-2018) In addition you should allow for the leading zero on single digit numbers.

Description - AA debugger has recently introduced a new behavior where it creates internal redirects for every server call. It's unclear why it needs to do so. A lot of similar debuggers out there don't affect the network tab logging. This has to be either fixed to not disturb the Network tab logs, or add an option to completely disable the AA debugger. Why is this feature important to you - While we use AEP to replace the Launch/DTM libs, its AA debugger is not comfortable to use for more technical people. We prefer to have our logs printed to the console, so we use something like the AA debugger Chrome extension. When the AEP debugger creates phantom AA hits, other debuggers report them as real, complicating the process for us. How would you like the feature to work - It should either stop creating hits in the Network tab, or have an option to completely disable its AA debugger with the network hits interception feature in the debugger. Current Behaviour - No way to di

I would like the ability to bulk edit layout templates the same way we can bulk edit many other things in Workfront. When new options/features are rolled out or changes are made, I often find myself going into each layout template individually to make the same change to each.

Right now in reporting when you generate the data you can filter a whole column or you can add a prompt to only see certain data, but wouldn't it be nice if instead, you could generate the report and then have selectable filters at the top of the columns just like Excel does, without having to export it? This would enable you to see just projects for "Joe Smith" or just projects at "100" or multiple filters, "projects with Approve, and Closed" - right now you have to setup the report specifically around that criteria, change your view or export to Excel. Seems like it would be more efficient and if Excel can do it - why can't Workfront?

Currently, there is only the option to filter the Utilization report by week or month which means that you can only export for those time periods. There should be options for day and yearly as many use this feature to forecast and end up having to pull each individual month and export it then combine all of those exports manually in Excel.

Add additional user settings options to the Workfload Balancer. Allow users to include/exclude data based on project status, task status, issue status, object type. Allow admins to set a default for teamsI regularly see confusion when projects that are in a status other than active are brought in to this view through the teams lense. The color coding of the projects by status is helpful but there's not a way to default that as the seting for everyone from the start. It would be better if admins or even team owners could default some of the intiial settings for users in a team view and then users could customize further from there. Even just setting a global default for these options would be a huge help to avoid confusion.

Sometimes one of the Directors needs to approve Requests for Payments on her phone via the app, but the app is not showing who the pending request is from and which other approvers are in the approval path or before and after her for approvals. On the website you can see the “Approval stage”, as well as who is next in the approval process. This helps her to understand which level she’s approving at. Is that something Workfront could look into on the App?

We would like an option in the PROJ API to add or remove Resource Managers on projects.This option is important to help automate RM ownership across 50,000+ projects.

The Status field on Requests displays the icon (dot) color and the status, i.e., [green dot] [In Progress]. It would be helpful if we had the same option for Projects. Status Icons is great, but sometimes having a consistent "view" is easier for the users to consume.Thanks!

We have had requests to add users to our environments. The problem is how do we know if that user is already in another environment? For example, I get a request from our Project Management Team to add a new user to the Project Management team. When I create their account, it gives me an "Email already taken" error. A quick trip to One.Workfront.com to submit a ticket, the support finds that the user in question is already in another environment and I was told to reach out to the Admin on the other environment to append the name with a + provisioning and then it works. However, the Workfront Admin from the other environment we have been working with quit and told us to use their help desk for any help. Problem is, they haven't responded at all since their admin left and here we are losing business day after day waiting to add the user to our environment. This system is a bit silly where we have to also do the digging and are dependent upon third parties in order to get AN