Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
When implementing Adobe Media analytics tracking, we have to pass "Stream Type" value.As per this document https://adobe-marketing-cloud.github.io/media-sdks/reference/javascript/MediaHeartbeat.html#.StreamType we can pass different value based on the Media content type.Just wanted to understand for which type of content what value we should pass. (just looking for below values)LIVELINEARAUDIOBOOKAOD
Description:Our users need a way to categorize comments in proofs. Reviews often include duplicate or similar feedback, and grouping them would make it easier to compare related or conflicting comments and speed up implementing edits. Why is this feature important to you:Grouping similar comments would save time, keep reviews organized, and improve accuracy when resolving conflicts. How would you like the feature to work:Allow users to tag or categorize comments (e.g., “Duplicate,” “Design Change,” “Content Edit”) and filter by those tags. This would let them view all related feedback together for faster, more organized reviews. Current Behaviour:Comments can only be reviewed individually.
Hi All,I’m working on a customization where the setRollUpImage method in our component is responsible for setting an image path. Currently, it works for most cases, but in some situations rollUpImage is null because the primary source doesn’t return a value.I want to add a fallback so that if the current logic doesn’t return a valid image, it should use delegate.getSrc() instead - without affecting the existing functionality.What’s the best way to modify the method so it still respects the current logic but adds this fallback?
I have a customized filter for a report, but every time I navigate away from the report and then back to it, the filter goes back to Standard. Is there a way to apply my filter so it always displays by default?
Hi Team, After running a journey in AJO and reviewing the "All Time Report," I noticed that some records were excluded under the Journey Exclusions section with the reason:ERROR_SEGMENT_REALISATION_CONDITION_MISMATCH.However, it's unclear what exactly caused these records to be excluded. Could you please advise on how and where I can get more detailed insights into this specific exclusion error to better understand and troubleshoot the issue? Thank you.
Hi, I have created a workflow model with a "Deactivate Page" step only and while running this i am getting "Process Resource null" error.I have also tried another step "Create page Version" and still getting the same error response.I have checked "com.day.cq.wcm.workflow" bundle and "create version" component both are active and my workflow model is in sync.Any suggestion how to solve it?Work Flow Error:Work Flow Model:
I’m working with the Universal Editor in Adobe Edge Delivery Services (EDS) and need to create new blocks/components for a project.My question is: in addition to implementing the new blocks, is it also possible to create custom ResourceTypes for them, similar to what we do in traditional AEM Sites?If so, is there any official documentation or practical example showing how to register and associate these ResourceTypes in the context of Universal Editor/EDS?
We have a Journey in AJO that is an event based audience. In our full data model, customers can have multiple accounts. Within the event, it tells us which account the customer is using to trigger the event.However before sending the e-mail we need to execute an account eligibility check (i.e. check our account level suppressions) by reconciling that account with the account data in the customer real time CDP / AEP.What type of syntax or how can we pull the account from the event then use that account to compare against the customers CDP/AEP profile?
Hello all,I'm facing an issue in Adobe Journey Optimizer (AJO) related to consent logging when customers submit a landing page form created in Visual Designer mode.Current Setup:* I built a landing page using AJO’s Visual Designer.* The form displays 8 subscription lists as checkboxes:* 6 are older subscription lists used in previous campaigns (which worked as expected before)* 2 are newly created subscription lists* Upon checkbox selection and saving preferences from the front end, the form is expected to:1. Update the customer profile - works2. Add/remove the selected subscription lists - works3. Log a consent event in the Consent and Preference dataset - doesn't work Problems Observed:Test 1 (New Subscription Lists):* Selecting and submitting new subscription list checkboxes:* Profile and subscription list updated * Consent and Preference dataset not updated Test 2 (Old Subscription Lists):* To isolate the issue, I tested again using one of the older subscription
For a variety of reasons, there are occasions where Adobe Target does not render on our Homepage, and shows the Hard/Page Default to users.While some of this is expected, I'm trying to understand if there is an expected benchmark that people see.
0I am trying to ingest data through CSV file into array type object fields in a schema in Adobe experience platform.But the data is not getting ingested although it's not showing any error while ingesting.Array type objects:Cool Numbers - Integer typeFavorite Choice - String type Sample data in csv file:Cool Numbers Favorite Choice2|26 ic|t5|63|74 t|ic When I am loading the CSV file manually into schema,I am creating calculated field for both of them liketo_array(true,split(Cool_Numbers,"|"))and mapping it to the corresponding target field.Validation is coming fine but when I finish the workflow and check the processed data,it shows blank in both the fields in the dataset.
I’m currently working with Samsung India on large-scale digital experiences and have seen first-hand how AEM can transform enterprise-level platforms into highly engaging, scalable, and future-ready ecosystems. We have a large, diverse team capable of handling complex and high-traffic projects. Our team is currently running samsung.com across multiple countries, and our members come from different parts of the world, collaborating from India. This global exposure has helped us understand varied market requirements, localization needs, and high-quality delivery standards. I’m curious to learn from the community — how do you approach identifying and onboarding new projects or partners that could benefit from AEM migration or upgrades?Specifically: How do you showcase the business value of moving from a standard CMS to AEM?What success stories or metrics have helped you convince stakeholders?Are there innovative engagement models or proof-of-concept approaches that have wor
Hello,I would like to know how is everyone configuring their Sandboxes ? Do you usually use one for dev and another for prod. Or have 1 for both prod and dev? Below are for 1 sandbox ( Dev+ prod)Pros - having 1 sandbox for AEP<>CJA data collection is that - We just need 1 AEP variable data element and reference the schema once in tags. Cons - hard for access management since everything is just one sandbox nowBelow are for 2 sandboxes ( Dev & prod)Pros - having 2 sandboxes for AEP <> CJA data collection is better for validating and testing, easier for access manage and change management. Cons - having 2 sandboxes will create a problem when we have to reference the schema in a AEP variable data element, each time we want to publish the libs between dev to prod. We will have to change it and higher maintenance.
We are looking to implement a "Buy It Again" recommendation zone on our site using Adobe Target. Specifically, we want to recommend items that a customer has previously purchased. I noticed there is a User-based algorithm with the option "Recommended for you based on the last purchased item." Could you please clarify:Does this algorithm only consider the customer’s most recent purchase, or does it take into account all purchases made by the customer within the lookback period?Is there an existing algorithm or configuration in Adobe Target that allows us to recommend all previously purchased items (not just the last one) as "Buy It Again" recommendations?
Does the 'Has Opportunity' filter only apply to records that have a contact role on the opportunity, or will it qualify all contacts associated to the account (company) for that opportunity?Example:I have 5 contacts associated with Account 123. Account 123 just recently opened an opportunity. Only 1 of those contacts has a Contact Role assigned on the opportunity. I want to create a smart list to pull in all 5 contacts associated with Account 123 based on criteria filtered at the opportunity level (for example, Opportunity Stage = “Open” and Close Date within the next 90 days). If I am using the 'Has Opportunity' filter, will the smart list output all 5 contacts from that account, or just the 1 contact with the Contact Role?
Description - Currently, when printing a dashboard directly from the platform, the print view does not automatically adjust to align properly. Although manual adjustments are available on our end to ensure proper alignment in the print preview, the process is not dynamic and requires user intervention.Request: We would like to request the ability for the print view of dashboards to dynamically adjust to ensure proper alignment, without requiring any manual adjustments from the user. This would provide a smoother, more seamless experience for users who frequently print dashboards and improve overall usability. Why is this feature important to you - Eliminates the need for manual intervention each time a dashboard is printed.Enhances user experience by ensuring that all elements on the dashboard are properly aligned in the print preview, making it more efficient for users.Streamlines the process for those who rely on printed reports for presentations or documentation.
I am facing a issue with JSCH working fine outside the AEM. But failing inside AEM.JSch jsch = new JSch(); // Add the private key identity jsch.addIdentity(privateKeyPath); // Get a session session = jsch.getSession(username, host, port); // Configure session properties Properties config = new Properties(); // Important: For testing, you might set StrictHostKeyChecking to "no" // In production, it's recommended to handle known_hosts properly. config.put("StrictHostKeyChecking", "no"); session.setConfig(config); // Connect to the session session.connect(); System.out.println("Session connected.");This works perfectly when I run it directly with main method ( outside osgi). But gives the below error when code is ran inside AEM.com.jcraft.jsch.JSchException: Auth fail at com.jcraft.jsch.Session.connect(Session.java:519) at com.jcraft.jsch.Session.connect(Session.java:183)I ran the code with java 11 and AEM is also running on java 11. The code inside AEM is also able to access
Hi there,1. Can we trigger a notification when an user does a bulk lead extract from Marketo? 2. Can we do IP blockage when suspicious activitiy (like bulk import) happens?
Since the recent AJO update introduced 'Dynamic Media' and started generating absolute image links, animated GIFs no longer seem to work. Has anyone found a workaround for this?
Whats the limit? I do not see that in AJO guardrails
I want to create under "set classification" when I'm in rule builder. Where do I create this? The classification set is a drop down where we can create more groupings. I want a new grouping created. Where can I add? Thanks in advance!
Description:There is a critical inconsistency between the activity records in the Adobe Admin Console and the logs shown in Workfront. When users make changes — such as editing profiles or managing access — via the Admin Console, these actions are not properly attributed in Workfront logs.Why is this feature important to you:Accurate traceability is essential for our security, audit, and compliance processes. Without clear identification of the user who performed a change, we face risks in governance and accountability. This is especially critical during permission reviews, account deactivations, or investigations.How would you like the feature to work:Workfront should reflect the actual user who performed the action in the Admin Console, both in the system logs and in Journal reports. Instead of showing “System” or generic labels, the logs should capture and display the authenticated user responsible for the change.Current Behaviour:Changes made in the Admin Console appear in Workfron
Description - Support WebP image file format for document upload and sharing (Not needed for proofing purposes) Why is this feature important to you - My team manages our corporate websites - those sites primarily use WebP file formatted images for page load speed and other reasons as supported by industry best practices. As an enterprise we use Workfront for request and project intake - so someone from another group within the enterprise can send a Workfront request to my team to update/create a web page - this included updating images - those individuals need to have the ability to upload and share WebP files with my team via Workfront for us to load to our DAM and websites. We would not need the ability to create WF proofs of these images. How would you like the feature to work - simply upload WebP file formatted images to documents within Projects and/or intake requests - again, for sharing purposes, not needed for proofing. Current Behavior - WebP
Hello, Is it possible through fusion to automate the assignment of an "Approver" for task-level approval workflows in converted projects? “Issue entry creator (Converted issue originator)” should be the approver.
It has been 6 years since I last used Adobe Analytics and will be starting a new role in 2 weeks and would love to do some studying and refreshing on Adobe Analytics during this free time. So any resources you could recommend would be wonderful.Thanks,Deeby
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.