Product Communities

Description -Ensure that the documentation is covered in the search index.  Why is this feature important to you -I was trying to find details about how the Analytics Extension feature "Enable EU Compliance" worked,  I searched on Experience League, and came across an old question that was answered with a snippet of documentation.  I could not find the current documentation for the feature using magnifying glass search.  Later on, Support gave me a link to the document.How would you like the feature to work -Have the search engine crawl the documentation content.Current Behaviour -

Need ability for Project Managers to delete their own comments without being able to delete others (Stakeholders, approvers, etc.). Often, Project Managers are pretasking with basic instructions and have to update those instructions when the work gets closer to when the resource needs to work on it.

The new timesheet layout has a lot of white space near the name of the projects/tasks, but then the actual place where hours are entered feels “smaller.” We are not able to adjust the column width ourselves. Can the product team tweak the timesheet layout to allow for more space? It would also be helpful if the column you've selected to enter time would highlight in some way. Lastly, it would be great if we could control whether or not we want to show the "Job Role" and "Hour Type" fields on timesheets. Since this information is defaulted for our users, they never need to change the information that is displayed there. Thank you!

Add a toggle or setting which allows users to switch between a monthly view of their timesheets or a weekly view like Workfront Classic had.

When building a custom form, if there is some sort of error in the build, the error message describes the conflict, but don't identify the fields causing the error. Please, please, please map the error to the field so we can correct the error.

The Enhanced Analytics area would be much more valuable if it had better filtering capability. For example, I want to be able to:Filter OUT any projects with project name containing a word, like 'admin'Filter OUT any project that doesn't include a custom form. It allows you to pull specific field answers from a custom form, but not just strip away or add in projects that have a specific custom form(s) included in the project in general. This would be a huge help.We need does not contain, is not blank, etc. like we have with report filters please!

Description - Within CJA, the Platform Dataset ID can be selected in Dimensions, but the not the Dataset Description Why is this feature important to you - Having the Dataset Description helps a lot for our Analysis instead of IDs. How would you like the feature to work - Display Platform Dataset Description within CJACurrent Behaviour - Only Platform Dataset ID is available in CJA Dimensions

n the new WF experience, on the Project Details section, can the default be set to collapsed for every project?

The new timesheet UI has lots of wasted white space, and for people that work on lots of projects, the amount of scrolling they have to do now is ridiculous. We only track time at the project level, not the task level, and it would be nice to only have 1 line per project to enter time on. With the grouping applied, it adds unnecessary noise to the timesheet and has the appearance of two duplicate lines per project.

We've run into a scenario where we need to include a wait step so that an alert isn't sent out prematurely after a specific triggered activity.  In this case, the alert cannot be sent out until the boolean field has changed to "NO" in CRM and then synced back to Marketo as "FALSE".Today, there are three types of wait steps:DurationDateTokenI'm suggesting a fourth - called "Condition/Attribute".  Which would allow a lead to wait until an attribute contains a specific value.  It would look very similar to a "choice" within a flow step.  For example:You might ask, why not just include this as a choice within the "send alert" flow step.  The reason is if the choice isn't true, then the flow step will just be passed.  Having it as a wait step will ensure the lead cannot progress in the flow until a specific condition is true.

When I am receiving an email from Workfront it shows from my name or the name of others submitting a request. I would like to see it appended prior to the name so it shows as Workfront: (Name). This would allow for easy sorting in my email to be able to see everything from Workfront at a glance or to be able to set a routing rule to move all Workfront requests to a folder.

Small change suggestion after 22.3 update.As a user, when I fill in the timesheet entry, once i click the 'comment' - comment window pops up and I want to be immediately able to type in it. Currently, when you click 'comment' and the small window coms up, the writing focus is not in the window. I have to click inside in order to start typing. Can the focus me in the window right away?

Hi Team - Could you please work on changing the names of tokens referred to as Lead Owner Email Address, Lead owner first Name, Lead Owner Last Name, etc., by default synced fields. As of now the name of the fields in the Admin Field Management section is by Sales Owner Email Address, Sales Owner First Name, Last Name, and Phone Number.The difference in names creates confusion about using them as tokens in the email personalization and if you are working on it, is there any time frame for that?

I need to be able to archive (or hide or make inactive) reports without deleting them. I want a period of time, before deletion, to archive them so I don't prematurely delete a report that someone my still be using. This gives users a little time to see if they need those archived reports.

Data stores are typically used as transient storage while a scenario runs.For some use cases, data stores act as a log - where success/error outcomes are recorded. It would be so helpful to be able to search a data store, and to export the visible result set.

Fusion has a "Run this module only" option. I'd love to see a "Run from here..." option that executes the module chain from the selected module. The challenge, in complex scenarios, will be ensuring that for the selected branch, all expected data points are present. "Run this module only" already checks for required input parameters. Since this is done interactively, every subsequent module would pop a similar dialog before being run; prepopulating existing parameters, and prompting the user to populate missing ones. This would be super helpful when editing complex scenarios, especially the event-triggered ones. In my case I wanted to add actions after an event triggered a large scenario to, in the end, create a new portfolio. I can't really test that path without triggering the full scenario.

It would be great if there's a way to create a option to limit if issues can be duplicated multiple times. Clients run into issues when they're seeking a 1:1 ratio between an issue and a project. It causes confusing and impacts reporting when multiple projects are created from one issue.

The new Out of Office Delegation feature for tasks/issues/requests in the latest 22.3 release is AWESOME, however I think there was a fairly big miss. You can delegate from the Home screen and within the task/issue/request itself, but NOT within the Time Off section of your user settings, where you can delegate Approvals (see below).This is where all of our users are trained to delegate their approvals at the moment, and I think it makes to the most sense to include it where people are logging their time off so they can delegate at the same time.

Allow Milestones to be edited in bulk or inlineIf I want to do a mass change to milestones, I'd have to go into each task and edit? This is highly inefficient.

A single line text field which includes .zip assumes a link and when saved tries to makes the .zip area a link, would like an option to deactivate this so it can just display as text. Sample of text field on Custom form:

Currently, the stats/usage.json API endpoint only returns the number of API calls used, which we can compare to our daily limit. It would be beneficial if there is a way to include the current Bulk Extract usage as well so as to prevent business process failures. We have several processes that use the bulk extract API and it would be nice to be able to retrieve analytics as far as which days we are approaching our limit as well as which services are using the most data.

We would like to see in a future iteration of the new project Metrics functionality, an ability to modularly turn off data pertaining to tasks, for intake queues. As we frequently leverage designated intake queues solely for issue/request routing purposes, information pertaining to completed/incomplete tasks is not relevant in these scenarios. This is a great feature, but it should be modularly customizable depending on use case.Ideal state (or some equivalent solution):Project Metrics configuration menu:Show project metrics for tasks and issues (shows all data)Also provides ability to toggle between showing only task or only issue data, and provides the ability to configure one or the other as a default view.Show project metrics for issues only (shows only issue data)Show project metrics for tasks only (shows only task data)

Add the option to notify users when they are unassigned (removed) from any type of workflow object; projects, tasks, requests, proofs, etc.As of right now, there is no way for a user to be notified if they are unassigned from any type of workflow object in Workfront. You can be a project sponsor, assigned to a task, and later unassigned from a task but there is no way for the system to notify you that you have been unassigned. Same with requests - you can be assigned a request, unassigned, and you will not receive a notification that you were removed.I tested this in multiple ways, once specifically in real time. When I was assigned to a task I received a notification saying such. When I was removed from that same task, not only was I not notified, but the notification saying I was previously assigned was removed from my user notification list. The history was removed. Essentially, Workfront is behaving as though being unassigned (removed) from an object is equivalent to never having b

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Published Status Visualization with colours Use-case: People with access to an AEM author should be able to be quick in recognizing a node as “never published”, “published”, “unpublished”, “modified” and/or “locked”. This should be true in each of the view modes, “Card View”, “Column View” and “List View”. Current/Experienced Behavior: a) In Column View, there user has no possibility to get a quick view of the published states. The status of a single file can be verified only when clicking it. b) in Card View a user can see the published status but also does not easily detect whether a node is published or unpublished – although the cards can vary in size in case they need to show more meta data. c) In “List View” a user gets the only possibility to get a pretty quick view of the matter, although – as said earlier – the different icons look pretty alike. Improved/Expected Behavior: If the three view modes would be enriched with co

In segment builder, we have fiew options such as "equals", "contains", "contains all of", "contains any of", "start with", etc. but there is no RegEx and no "equals any of"...Here is my problem:I have a prop or an eVar containing an id. I want to filter on this prop or eVar to have only a list of specific ids.I can't use "equals" and the "OR" operator because the list is too long and I can't add the ids one by one.I can't use "contains any of" because it's ids, so if I enter "id contains any of 42, 1804, 23", it will return 42, 1804 and 23, but also every id containing those numbers!!! (ex. 425 because it contains 42, 623 because it contains 23, 1000018040002. because it contains 1804)So I need a "equals any of" that would be an automatic combination of "equals" and OR, in order to match exactly the list.I guess this would be useful for many users that could be in the same trouble I am.