Product Communities

The search function in the Design Studio seems to have gone backwards in terms of functionality. Searching by keywords no longer produces results, rather you must know the exact name of the file you are searching for, which is not feasible. Since we can no longer toggle back to the "old" experience, this is going to create a significant decrease in user-friendliness.

I wish there was an easier way to delete custom objects without having to manually remove any campaigns or smartlists that they are associated with. This is especially tedious for custom objects that are referenced many, many times. We will be creating new custom objects to replace some older objects as we move to a new CRM.

We have the need to control the inherited permissions via our internal integration tool (ACM by IBM). The Workfront API does not have any supported method of adjusting the Inherited Permissions. This is something that was brought to the Product Team earlier this year and there is no plan at this time to add this to the API, we need this prioritized to add another level of control to Workfront objects.

Description - I would like to see if there is a way to add a generic option for "any external user" as a user into the "log in as" option for system adminWhy is this feature important to you - Often times we are creating reports for external clients, or have external partners that need to see something and things often look different externally so it would be GREAT if we would easily with a few clicks go into the mode of "seeing everything as a generic external user" instead of using work aroundsHow would you like the feature to work - I envision it as almost a default option in the "Log in as" section where you could just click a button or select an option to "any external user" to see what anyone with generic "reviewer" permssions might see Current Behaviour - Otherwise, we often have to go into GMAIL or use a personal off line non-company email to see what emails and notifications look like so that we can create instructions and screenshots for our external partners more accura

We have attached a custom form that users have to fill out when generating proofs in Workfront.  The data in that custom form is stored in ProofHQ.  It would be useful if the data from those forms could be referenced and reported on from Workfront.  Currently, that data is inaccessible for reporting purposes in Proof.  

Currently we do not have an easy way to find who has been assigned to a project within proofs by their name and associated role without backing out of the proof. We would like a way to see the assigned person’s name and their associated role under workflow. This will eliminate the need to back out and into the actual project to find the name and role(s). Currently, if within a proof you hover over a name assignment under workflow, it will show the email address only. Why is this important? Because if there are around 20 or more tasks on a project, it becomes challenging to find the user associated to the task that requires proof approval.  Example: A copywriter is needed to approve the proof. Task 24 on the project has a task listed as Copywriter review. In order to determine the copywriter to add to the proof at this stage, you have to back out of proof via clicking the project link. Then find that associated task to then pull in the name.  

The default expense types are not ones that all teams use and can be confusing when you are not able to hide delete or edit them. Not all teams use Advertising, Consulting, General, Materials, and Travel or may call them other items. These fields should be ones that at minimum can be hidden.

We cannot for the life of us figure out why WF does not allow us to edit or at least hide the default expense types. We don't use most of them, preferring other names specific to our business.

Allow native integration to sync additional fields (other than Company Name and Job Title) to Gotowebinar when using a Marketo landing page and form for events registration, as Gotowebinar analytics dashboard is more user-friendly for non-Marketo users. 

Description - Add triggers to start the scenario for Adobe Target Fusion module so that it helps users to automatically run the scenarios based on an event trigger.Why is this feature important to you - The ability to add triggers for Adobe Target Fusion module is essential as it empowers users to automate scenario execution in response to specific event triggers. This feature enhances efficiency, enabling real-time, personalized content delivery and optimizing user experiences.How would you like the feature to work - For an ideal implementation of this feature, I'd like users to be able to define triggers within the Adobe Target Fusion module. These triggers should include a wide range of event types, such as user interactions, system events, or external data signals. Users should be able to set conditions and actions, allowing for the seamless automation of scenario execution when the specified trigger conditions are met. Current Behaviour - Users are limited to u

Description - Add some additional search operators (like Text, DateTime, Numeric, Boolean operators) to Target API in-order to apply search criteria to retrieve multiple records.Why is this feature important to you - This feature is crucial as it empowers users to fine-tune their searches effectively, enabling them to extract multiple records that precisely match their criteria. By expanding the available operators, we enhance the user experience, making it more versatile and efficient in retrieving the desired data, ultimately boosting productivity.How would you like the feature to work - I would like the feature to provide users with an extended set of operators, such as logical operators (AND, OR, NOT), comparison operators (>, <, =), wildcard operators (*, ?), and grouping operators (parentheses). Users should be able to combine these operators to create complex search queries, allowing for a more granular and tailored data retrieval process. Additionally, a user-fr

Description - We would like to design fields and forms in the sandbox to test items there prior to implementing in production.    Why is this feature important to you / how would you like it to work - While we can create items in production and then have the sandbox refreshed, we cannot design something in the sandbox and move to production.  Often part of the testing requires changes to other areas that we don't want to change in production until we know it works. We want to create mockups and test in our sandbox that we can then push to production without needing to recreate all the work we completed in the sandbox. This would be a great timesaver.   

Description - Why is this feature important to you - I have a ton of video content to watch back as part of my day-to-day job. I need to get through any extra tutorial content for things like Workfront as fast as possible.  How would you like the feature to work - add speed options to the video play bar: 1.25x, 1.5x, and, 1.75x or even 2x options would be good.  Current Behaviour - tutorial video playback speed is currently only at normal speed. 

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Bi-directional Document synching with Sharepoint Use-case: We would like our Project Managers and Workers to be able to manage documents within WF and have those changes synch with Sharepoint. If a change or deletion occurs when the document is accessed via Workfront, then those should reflect in Sharepoint.  Current/Experienced Behavior: Synching does not occur, but rather documents added to Workfront do not get synched to Sharepoint.  Improved/Expected Behavior: Bi-directional Document synching with Sharepoint Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable):   Customer-name/Organization name: NTT America Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Updating users via the API is slow compared to most other object types.  For example, updating a user's home group takes about 2 seconds.  Performing this via the bulk update API doesn't improve this.  I suspect WF is performing unnecessary actions when making simple updates to the user objects. This is affecting our ability to bulk update the Home Group for 380k users via the API.  What should normally take a couple hours is taking over a week. I recommend that the engineering team update the code so that it only does the extra processing when certain fields change on a user. WF already does this for tasks. For example, if a task is renamed, it doesn’t trigger the timeline engine to execute…it just updates the database. But if the task’s duration changes, the timeline engine kicks into gear.

Description - We would like the ability to copy paste rich text into updates.   Why is this feature important to you - Often we write meeting notes in Word.  Meeting notes commonly have rich text formatting such as bulleted lists.  Or we want to copy paste the contents of an email into Workfront.  When we paste this, we want the formatting to look the same on Workfront as it does in the original.   How would you like the feature to work - I would like the formatting (bullet points, bold text, indents, etc.) to remain in the pasted text in the Workfront update.   Current Behavior - Currently one of two things happens.  1. Pasting normally causes odd changes to formatting, extra characters, different indentations, and sometimes adds HTML characters.  2. Pasting plain text only removes all formatting and requires the poster to redo it.  

In Bizible/Marketo Measure, Ad Destination URL is available for LinkedIn Sponsored Content, but not LGF. Please make available for LinkedIn Lead Gen Forms.   Want to be able to capture the url of what was promoted and what the user fills out lead gen form for. The landing page URL is usually not the same as the Ad destination URL. Would be able to standardize "Landing Page URL" from other sources to "Ad Destination URL" from LGF.

We had built a series of curated workspaces that gave our end users a set of carefully selected projects to be able to interrogate the data. They restricted the projects to simple sets of data making it easy for our users and also restricted them having access to the full set of dimensions which we didn't want them to have.#We did and do not want our non analyst community to be able to create their own workspaces but rather use the ones we had created for them. They were pre-built, simple to use and controlled.What you have done now is open up the full workspace to everyone. We wouldn't have dreamed of giving our non-analysts access to Ad-Hoc analysis yet we are now giving them access to create uncurated projects in the more powerful workspace with the full range of dimensions.Why have you done this???

Description -After the April 2023 update, my filter selections no longer stick in the area I'm working in.Previously: While on the Projects tab, I could select Filter A for that listing. When I clicked on my team's Portfolio tab, i could select to use Filter B. Whenever I moved in and out of projects or across tabs, Filter A would always be on Projects and Filter B on the portfolio until I changed themNow: I set Filter A on the Project tab. I move to the Portfolio tab and Filter A is set. I change it to Filter B. I move back to the Project tab. Filter B is now set. The previously selected filter does not "stick" This is important to me because as the manager of the team, nearly everyone puts me as the project sponsor on their projects. Unfortunately, all of these projects appear when using the "Projects I'm On" filter, even if I have no task assignments. So I created a filter to show only projects where I have actual task assignments. This is how I filter the Projects list. W

It appears the ability to add comments to projects while bulk editing has been removed. How can you make an edit to projects without making a comment documenting what you have changed? Workfront has cost my staff and I hours of wasted time as we now have to edit one project at a time so we can properly document the changes that are being made. Taking this away has removed being able to use the bulk editing feature entirely. Please let me know when this functionality has been restored.

Problem Description:Currently, Adobe After Effects does not offer a built-in feature for setting global motion blur preferences that apply to all compositions within a project.This limitation can be quite cumbersome for users working on extensive projects, as they need to individually configure motion blur settings for each composition, which can be time-consuming and prone to inconsistencies.Suggested Solution:I kindly request that Adobe consider implementing a feature that allows users to set global motion blur preferences at the project level. This feature would enable users to define motion blur settings that apply universally to all compositions within the project. Here's how it could work:In the project settings or preferences, add a "Global Motion Blur Settings" section.Within this section, users should be able to set parameters such as motion blur on/off, shutter angle, and motion blur samples.These global settings would override the composition-level settings unless a composit

Proof comments submitted independent of one another may be missed or get lost within other notifications. The option to "batch" proof notifications within the Workfront application will streamline the proofing process, as well as eliminate any question as to whether or not all comments were seen.

Description -We commonly link directly to the source file in Outlook and Teams correspondence.  The file is located in a shared drive so multiple people can access the file at the same time and any edits are automatically saved.  There is no need to have multiple versions of the file.  It is the most efficient way to manage changes.We copy and paste the file path into the comments or within a project task and when the user clicks on the link, it will take them directly to the file.This option does not exist today.  

Description - When trying to find tasks in the intake column to move to the board, the search tool within the column only searches the task names. When I search for project names, I get no results. The problem is that our task names are generic (e.g., Web Page Live, Update Page, etc.) but our project names are unique (e.g., Fall 2023 Campaign) so we really need a way to search for project names to find associated tasks. I know there are ways to manually create cards on the board which allows search for project name, or use the board configurations to filter down the intake column for specific projects, but being able to use the search tool would make things much quicker and more efficient.Why is this feature important to you - Our department uses WF to manage numerous ongoing projects at any given time, however my team is usually only responsible for one task per project. The idea of using a Kanban board to visualize our tasks seems like an efficient way to monitor our work, but gettin

Description - I confirmed with support that a job roles report does not display the Quick Filter when the report is included in a dashboard because it has not been brought into parity with other report interfaces.Why is this feature important to you - The Quick Filter is one of the most helpful functions across Workfront. For lengthy data sets, it is essential to have the Quick Filter for searching within those large data sets.How would you like the feature to work - Make the user interface parallel to other reports that automatically display the Quick Filter and filters, views, and groupings options.Current Behaviour - The workaround to access the Quick Filter is to open the job roles report standalone (outside of the dashboard).