Product Communities

Not tagging a person on a update and going back and relying to that comment a week later makes it look like the person has been tagged on both comments. It allow a person to come back and say"this person was tagged the whole time" The user should know exactly who was tagged on each individual comment. This will hold people accountable foe tagging the appropriate people at the time of the comment. Attached a snapshot from a ticket I opened. Was asked to put this into Idea Exchange but I think that 18.1 release and before worked differently then it does in 18.2

It would be nice to make updates that you choose to be private with other colleagues and that not everyone can see them until you choose for them to.

I want the document updates to roll up to the parent task / issue and the project. Currently you have to find the correct document to find a particular comment. You can't just look at the project as a whole to find comments made on a document.

The ability to report on the data currently captured in the update feed. For example, we have a need to track when a status was last updated to determine if a project status has gotten stale.

I would like the ability to route custom forms for approval within Workfront. Alternatively also have the option to Print to PDF, particularly when there are multiple custom forms at the project or task level. For example, I am in the process of converting our project charter template from Microsoft Word to a custom form in WF. The idea being, the PM could complete the project charter within WF, route the custom form to the project sponsor for approval and/or comment, all within WF instead of having to do it outside the system. With the Print PDF, you can do this, however, it will print all the custom forms on the project or task and you cannot select one custom form.

Right now, if a custom form is attached to a task, there is nothing that forces the user to fill out the custom form. The task may be completed, without the custom form from being updated. Even if the custom form has required fields. Only when someone edits the custom form, does it require you to fill in the required fields. We have examples of collecting information when we get to certain points in a project. This data is being collected via a custom form on a task. However, the system doesn't force the assigned to user to fill in the custom form. They can close the task without even looking at the custom form tab. As a workaround we have been attaching an approval process to the task, so the PM can verify the information was populated. However, it would be nice to not have to take this extra step.

Having the functionality to copy a custom field will be hugely beneficial to the users in charge of managing the forms and System Administrators. Currently if I, for example, have a dropdown with 100 choices, and want to have a second dropdown with 99 choices, I will have to manually recreate all those 99 choices.

Hello All,   Many enthusiastic bloggers has covered sling model concepts. But thought of writing all the sling model concepts that the developers, Architects should be aware of. Let me know, if I miss any concepts here.   Various Annotations usedWhy to avoid @586265 annotationUse of Adaptable.Sling Delegation Pattern for Sling ModelGet Design dialog values from sling modelReading inherited Page Properties Handling Nested multi field values from dialogSling Model FactorySling Model Caching

Description - In the current offering of CJA, we do not have an ability to digest Content or Asset Insights in CJA as its natively only meant to be processed by AppMeasurementWhy is this feature important to you - As we move the WebSDK, the idea is to sunset existing Adobe Analytics and just use CJA moving forward.How would you like the feature to work - We would expect to have the same feature functionality that we do today to integrate Content and Asset Insights with AEM fueled by the Analytics PlatformCurrent Behaviour - Working As Designed.

We hadn't used Workstreams before October 2023, when it was removed. Now Workstreams is unavailable to use for us, since we didn't have it in use prior to October. According to Support there is no projected date for a re-release of the Workstream functionality. Our teams would like to use the Workstream functionality. Will there be a replacement or re-release of Workstreams or similar functionality?

Description -Add a new non-admin access level specifically for Data Warehouse that allows users to view all existing jobs, especially recurring ones.Why is this feature important to you -Our data engineers and current users need to access all recurring jobs as it is essential to their job function. Our organization has a high turnover rate. However, we don't want to grant admin access to all our data warehouse users.How would you like the feature to work -In the admin console, admins will have a new access option to assign to users: view all jobs in Data Warehouse.Current Behaviour -When the Data Warehouse UI updated a few months ago, our regular users were not able to access the existing jobs, including recurring jobs, as they had been able to do before. After promoting them to admin, they were then able to see all existing jobs.

We routinely have to do grouping when making our illustations in Adobe Illustrator.  That can be over several thousand objects, grouped into bunches of only 50 or less. It would be much more resource-efficient to have a module that can do the grouping of connected or overlapping objekts on the whole page automatically. 

When there is more than one user in the same workflow/delivery/object in ACS, either a lock should be added or a notification should be sent. Recently, we have encountered two issues where changes are not saved correctly in live campaigns due to overlapping resources. As a result, changes are not saved properly and the client program is experiencing errors.Below is the error that we get when the workflow/delivery has an error:PGS-220000 PostgreSQL error: ERROR: canceling statement due to user request Multiple users working simultaneously on the same workflow/delivery get aborted, resulting in the client's campaign being delayed, affecting their revenue.

Persistent “Open Proof” Button is great but can we add a second persistent button so that “Document Details” also appears. It would minimize the number of clicks and help track where a proof is along the workflow.

Description: Persistent row (aka job, report) and column filter  Why is it important? The DWH export feature is being used for scheduled and ad hoc exports and therefore it's the home for a lot of entries, mixing up all kind of requested exports for all kind of purposes, this also requires "speaking" request names which are sometimes quite long; as there are too many columns, the request names are cropped - too many rows and too many columns requires to (de-)select unnecessary columns and row filters How should the feature work? the UI should remember the filter I selected and columns i (de-)selected Current behavior: If you (de)select particular columns or filters from the right sidebar, right after you added a new job or editing an existing one and get back to the list of all jobs/reports, all jobs/reports and columns are displayed again

Hi there, Our team was surprised to find that there was not a merge profiles function on the tool. This was a feature of Campaign Classic, however we found that there are many data issues as a result of not having that function. We have thousands of duplicate profiles on our org's instance of ACS. The unique identifier was not set as the email originally and now we have the issue of users unsubscribing and still being on the email communications because they have several profiles under the same email address in our system. I had heard rumors that this was going to be an addition to one of the updates, but I have yet to see any official statements on that function. I would think this is a basic need across all organizations. Please let me know if there is any development on this!Thanks,- Mike

It'd be great if there was a built in URL shortener in Adobe Campaign, specifically when using SMS.  Since SMS only uses 160 characters, every character is important.  It'd be great if there was configuration options as well, to determine level of tracking needed and how many characters would be needed.

It would be great if inside ACS there was the ability to add Superscripts and Subscripts for like trademarks, copyright symbols, etc.

Description - API endpoints to pass email template or email message HTML (and associated metadata) to ACSWhy is this feature important to you - Many companies increasingly use an Email Creation Platform like Stensul for email creation and collaboration, and then want to automatically push the finished html (via API) into Adobe Campaign Standard for deployment.How would you like the feature to work - similar functionality to the Marketo Emails and Email Templates API endpointsCurrent Behaviour - n/a. a user has to copy and paste html into ACS thank you!

Our organization aims to determine the most common times of day when users open messages from specific campaigns. We want to know whether they tend to open them in the morning, early afternoon, late afternoon, or other times.When creating a report, we have Time dimensions available for Day, Hour, Minute, Month, and Quarter. However, the Hour dimension currently only specifies the hour of a particular day (such as 9:00 AM on April 1, 2023), not the hour of a general day (such as 8:00 AM - 8:59 AM)

Right now, if we are on a Task, and we convert that task into a Project, as soon as we do that, the original task is deleted. The request is the following:We are in Project A, and we have Task number 1.We are in Task Number 1 and convert that Task into Project B.The Task number 1 will remain in Project A.User will update the progress/status of the Project B.Automatically update the progress/status of task 1 in Project A. Regards.

Checked off/actioned comments should be removed from the comment count#. Only new comments on the newest version of a proof should be counted.

DescriptionWhile our users try to adhere to standard  naming conventions for Target activities, the names are not fixed and may be adjusted throughout the lifecycle of the activity (Development, QA, Production, Completion). The only permanent identifier seems to be the Activity ID, however it is also useless because you cannot search by it.Why is this feature important to youBeing able to search by Activity ID would also give us a permanent way to refer to activities in other documentation where it would be impractical to keep updating the name.Please note that changing the name of the activity based on the status of the activity before and after launch was a recommended approach from our Adobe consultants. How would you like the feature to workEnter the activity ID in the Target UI activity search box and return the specified activity.Current BehaviourThe search tool only works with activity names at the moment.

Make instances an available metric for data warehouse reporting.  If it's in the regular UI it should be in DW too.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Page unlock feature to product admin Use-case: When a page is locked by user and goes on a vacation or out of shift. Other authors need to wait until the user is back or need to create a ticket with adobe which is taking lot of time time. Current/Experienced Behavior: Even product admins not able to unlock the page and impersonate as that user also not helping to unlock. Only adobe admin users are able to unlock the page as of today. Improved/Expected Behavior: Product admin should able to unlock the page directly or by impersonating as page locked user. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): NA Customer-name/Organization name: Bread Financial Screenshot (if applicable): NA Code package (if applicable): NA