Product Communities

Description - We would love to see calendar capabilities where you can go into a calendar and click on an item, then a summary would open up where you could take action on that item - like what happens in the old My Work/Home view where you could select Calendar then see all of your objects due each day, then click them to open a summary. Alternatively (or in addition) we would love to see that calendar functionality added into the new My Home experience or whatever work management capabilities are coming in the future.  Why is this feature important to you - We have many creatives and visual learners/workers who cannot work as efficiently through large lists of tasks. We benefit highly from seeing a calendar view with objects due. Being able to click into those items and take action (rather than how calendars currently function where you can just click the object then have to click a link to go to it and leave the calendar) would be super helpful. This functionality has alre

HiDescription - I have a need at a large Financial Organization to allow publishing/adding Project to the company folder without have full admin access. Today only full admins can add projects to the company folder.Why is this feature important to you - Based on how the project structure has been made up using folder for different business areas there is a lot of over-head put on admins to just structure projects created by business practitioners.How would you like the feature to work - Allow non-admins to save projects into company folder and its sub-folders.Current Behaviour - Non admins cannot save projects into the company folder. RegardsMarcus

Hi Team, We have a requirement from a client, that they want to reuse the configured webinars on AEM or some other portals to avoid reauthoring the same structure on the website to drive traffic. Currently, there doesn't seem to be a way to expose this data using some API or if it is there, then I did not find any documentation.Thanks,Amogh

Currently, every time an expense is logged, the user must manually add the custom form (see image below). This additional step can often be overlooked, leading to inconsistencies and incomplete data entry.I suggest a feature within template settings that allows users to select a default custom form for expense logging. By doing so, the selected form should automatically be applied whenever a new expense is logged.Questions related to this topic:1) I have a custom form for Expenses. I can add it to... - Adobe Experience League Community - 5056692) I have created custom expense forms that I need to... - Adobe Experience League Community - 467492

Sometimes I have a need to copy an issue in order to create 2 or more issues because we allow our requestors to select multiple services within a single request, but each service is managed by a different team and therefore the issue needs to be split so we can assign different project owners. From within the Issue, I click copy to: Then I get this screen and select Copy Issue I submitted a support request because I noticed that the Issue Path on these copied issues was not copying over, and I was told that by using this copy method, it is just copying the info on the issue but it doesn't use the Path that you normally use, and this is a system generated field and there isn't a way to override it. If I want the Path to show, I would need to submit a new request rather than use the "copy to" feature.  My support tech recommended I submit this idea to the Innovation Lab.

Currently, if an alert is triggered, the receipient gets a link to a automated dashboard with some details of the trigger. I think it would be better if we had the option to instead include a link to a workspace that we'd built. We can then include specific visualisations and breakdowns which we suspect may be the cause of anomalies in the data (e.g. if the alert is triggered due to a drop in orders, can we first see if there was a drop in checkouts) This could allow the recipient to investigate the issue with more business context. The feature would work in that the alert creator would include a tickbox for "include link to specific workspace". If ticked, this would prompt a searchable dropdown of all workspaces which the alert owner has access to. They could then select one, and a link to this workspace would be included in the alert email. When saving the alert, users would also be prompted to share the linked workspace with any recipients who did not alread

Description - When an organization has a large amount of report suites, it can sometimes be difficult to find the correct one to work in. In order to make it easier to find report suites (especially if you typically rotate through a few different ones), have the ability to either mark them as a favourite or pin them to the top of the list.    Why is this feature important to you - This is important because if you have a large number of analysts that do reporting, making sure that they are able to find the correct report suite for reporting is essential to pulling the correct data. If your organization has multiple report suites with very similar names, it's easy to pick the wrong one, and that can lead to providing the wrong numbers. Being able to have users pin/favourite report suites once can make it easier for future reports to find them again, especially if they're switching through a few different ones.   How would you like the feature to work - When you click the

The vast majority of users within our organization that utilize Workfront are not Project Managers and have little to no experience with project management tools but are looking for an easy alternative to Excel. As such, we don't expect these "non-technical" resources to dig into the differences between all of the available task constraint options or create flowing, linked task lists in which options like "As Soon as Possible" would apply. We always direct these users to change their task constraints to "Fixed Dates" when creating new tasks in order to have full control over "planned start" and "planned completion dates" of their tasks. This further complicates the process for already overwhelmed newcomers to the tool, and is the cause of a lot of strife for onboarding new teams. A great solution for this would be to create a settings option within "Setup -> Project Preferences -> Tasks & Issues" in which a system admin could set the default value system wide for the "Ta

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Either enable copying the path to an asset within the AssetLink file details page or jump straight to the asset in AEM by clicking the path. Use-case: This feature would unlock all the information stored with the asset right from Asset Link.  Current/Experienced Behavior: path can neither be highlighted and copied nor clicked Improved/Expected Behavior: as described above Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): InDesign 202217.0.1 AssetLink3.1.65 AEM 6.5SP9 Customer-name/Organization name: Spar ICS + Spar Austria Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Would be great to create custom timesheet reminders based on a different sets of criteria (rather than just the 3 default options we have now). For example, it'd be great to set up notification if a timesheet is under 40 hours. Or, if a timesheet is missing notes on entries.

Please remember to hit the LIKE button to vote for this idea! Description - When the Key Metric Summary was first introduced, it originally displayed the metrics with the number larger, ON TOP, larger, with the percentage smaller, and ON BOTTOM, like this: Now that some significant changes have been made (sometime after the new year), and the feature has finally been repaired (after work I just completed with Customer Care), the formatting has also been changed so that the percentage permanantly displays OVER the number, with no ability for us to swap their positions. This is frustrating, because it used to display just the opposite, and we have no abilty to change how it's displayed. Consequently, I am proposing the following:Not only should we have choice whether to emphasize the percentage or the number, but we should ALSO have the option to decide which number displays on top, which means the display should be dynamic, based upon the user's choice.Why is this feature importan

Please add an option to filter rules to "Include sub-tasks" when displaying the filtered tasks. Currently, the filter rule only shows matching tasks, but there's no way to filter tasks that are related by parent-child relationship. The use case is to create a view of specific parent tasks and be able to restrict the project view to just those tasks and their subtasks.

We utilise Workfront to deliver projects to our customers utilising partners and our internal team. This means per project we have different Billing rates per role, but more importantly we have different cost rates per role.  I need the same ability we have to manage billing rates but for COST rates, by role, per project for defined time periods.  Otherwise I need to duplicate roles per partner per project resulting in potentially thousands of unmanagable job roles. 

We've had the need to add tasks and Iterations to the Typeahead field in our organization, I believe extending the functionality to include other object types will be useful. Would this be a simple implementation for the future?

Description - We would like to enhance the filtering in the AEP UI. Why is this feature important to you - Having the ability to further drill down into filters via the UI, unlocks more capability for the users of AEP. How would you like the feature to work - Filter by audience on dataflow runs pages, adjust column sizing and filter for what is currently processing- Filter and sort by audience, start date, or end date on activation data page, and adjust column sizing. Current Behaviour - No current ability to do any of the above filtering in detail.

The current integration between Dynamics CRM and our CRM system displays the GUID (Globally Unique Identifier) for all synced lookup fields. This approach provides no practical value to the Marketing team, as the GUID is a technical identifier that does not convey meaningful information. Instead, presenting the actual values of these lookup fields—such as customer names, product names, or campaign titles—would significantly enhance the usability and effectiveness of the CRM system for the Marketing team.By displaying the actual values rather than the GUIDs, the Marketing team can quickly and easily identify and interact with the relevant data. This change would facilitate better data analysis, improve decision-making processes, and ultimately increase productivity.Moreover, seeing actual values instead of GUIDs aligns with the way the Marketing team uses the CRM system in their daily operations. For instance, when tracking customer interactions or managing marketing campaigns, being ab

機能改善要求（RFE）概要： Improve Replication Queue not to block other queues when "Blocked Replication Queue" occurs ユースケース： When an error occurs in the replication queue and the queue is blocked, subsequent queues cannot be processed until the blocked queue is removed by someone.With this limitation, we'are facing a critical challenge in our operation such as;- when a block occurs on weekends or at midnight, there is no one who can remove the blocked queue, so any pages and/or assets cannot be published until next business day.- when a block occurs on a Brand A's site, that also blocks other replication queues for Brand B.   Can you please change the behavior? such as skip the error queue instead of blocking all queues after an error occurs? 現在／体験した動作： When an error occurs in the replication queue and the queue is blocked, subsequent queues cannot be processed until the blocked queue is removed by someone.Notification is sent from Action Center, so that someone in administrator c

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Please increase the upper limit of the number of workflows that can be executed simultaneously Use-case: There are cases where many workflows (No. 1, No. 2) occur simultaneously. 1.Publishing process Approval flows may occur simultaneously to publish multiple products at the same time on the same date and time. 2.Back processing Cyclic processing for linking with other systems (once/5 minutes) Approval flow in production work (movement, deletion approval)   As a result, there is an issue of delays in publishing products with specified dates and times Current/Experienced Behavior: Insufficient increase in the number of workflows that can be executed simultaneously Improved/Expected Behavior: Increase the number of workflows that can be executed simultaneously. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Release 2024.5.16461.20240524T172309Z Customer-name/Organization nam

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Introduce a one-click configuration that syncs AEM DAM with Dynamic Media for asset deactivation and deletions Use-case: Today when an asset is unpublished from AEM, author has to manually unpublish from DM also using Tools --> Assets --> CDN Invalidation. Second, if asset is deleted from AEM, it NEVER automatically deletes from DM. Second asset in same name appends -1 numerals in DM urls. This forces developers to write custom implementations to maintain sync between AEM and DM.  Current/Experienced Behavior: Asset unpublished / deleted from AEM does NOT unpublish / delete corresponding assets from DM. This causes flux, unsync between AEM and DM Improved/Expected Behavior: Create a DM configuration that can sync AEM with DM. So unpublish/delete from AEM should automatically perform same actions from DM as well. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS latest, likely a

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Introduce a one-click configuration that syncs AEM DAM with Dynamic Media for accepted formats.  Use-case: Today we have a AEM DAM delivery folder that is synced with DM. This DAM folder accepts ALL AEM compatible formats. But they fail to upload into DM, since DM allows only restricted formats. We found after certain assets failed in production. Now adding extra implementation to reject  DM incompatible formats in AEM. Current/Experienced Behavior: AEM accepts more asset formats than Dynamic media. This causes AEM assets succeed at AEM, but fail at Dynamic media.   Improved/Expected Behavior: Introduce a one-click config, when enabled, AEM should also reject DM incompatible asset. Reduces maintenance overhead.  Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS latest, likely affects any AEM version Customer-name/Organization name: SouthernGlazers Screenshot (

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Extend the "Explain Query" tool to capture graphql queries and suggest optimizations over gql queries  Use-case: We are running multiple graphql queries on AEMaaCS and works in Production. Periodically some queries run longer time and sometimes heavy queries crashes the server. Current/Experienced Behavior: No tool to analyze and suggest optimizations for GraphQL queries.  Improved/Expected Behavior: Build a tool similar to "Explain Query" for JCR queries that can suggest optimizations for graphql queries. Provide insights on execution time and cost for traverse and reference. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS latest, likely affects any AEM version Customer-name/Organization name: SouthernGlazers Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Description - Currently there is no way to specify the order of execution of extensions that are included in launch.js and run at the top of the page.Why is this feature important to you - We use a data monitoring technology that is deployed through Adobe Launch and needs to be the very first extension that runs when the library loads so it can properly monitor the data being collected on pages. As of right now it can't monitor all technologies consistently because the order of extension code is randomized at every publish and there is no way to specify that extension A should load before extension B.How would you like the feature to work - I would like to be able to specify either the exact processing order or be able to set an optional priority score (similar to rules) for extensions that are bundled with the core launch.js file.Current Behavior - Adobe Launch does not currently have a way to specify in the interface the priority of how extension code executes when the library initia

Just a reminder to everyone, a LIKE means a VOTE for this idea.It always confuses me when I see tons of views for ideas, but hardly any "likes." Description - How many times have any of you spent creating a Workspace in Adobe Analytics, only to have any number of Visualizations that you would now like to format similar to one you have recently updated?  What do you do?  Do you delete the old ones, and copy the new one so you may then tie them to the data table?  Or, do you simply proceed to each and use that new visualization as your guide to update the others?Why is this feature important to you - This would be a productivity UPLIFT.  There are plenty of times when I'm adjusting components in a workspace that I would love to simply apply changes I just made to related items. How would you like the feature to work - For this specific feature, I would simply like to go to the Visualization I like, right-click on it, select "Copy Visualization," select the V

Description - Row level filtering from batch source connections Why is this feature important to you - Ability to filter out rows of data based upon specific filtering criteria. How would you like the feature to work - Utilize the flow service api to specify a row level filter parameter for all batch source connections. Current Behaviour - The ability to filter row level items is only available using Snowflake, Dynamics, Saleforce, and GBQ.   https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-platform/sources/api-tutorials/filter

Description -We'd really like to be able to lock down the ability to delete proof comments from certain users.  Why is this feature important to you -We have our Compliance teams beginning to use Workfront and would love to be able to "lock down" this particular ability to meet regulatory requirements/guidelines. But we don't want to lock it down system wide/for other roles in other departments. How would you like the feature to work -Ideally I'd be able to toggle the ability to delete comments on or off a proof profile. Current Behavior -Currently you can only toggle this feature on/off system wide, there is no way to customize by user/etc.