Adobe Workfront

…………………………….

Hi Fusion Community,Does anyone know if there is an API endpoint or other function in Fusion that will allow me to bulk export proofs that include the proof images with comments and markups visible?I know on the frontend of Workfront you can use the Print option when in a proof and this accomplishes my ask, but I have thousands of proofs to export and need to do this in bulk.Thanks,Nick

After a marketer gives feedback on a piece of creative work, the designer should be able to open that proof and review the feedback and the markups that were made on the proof correct? Today, our designers reported that once they were notified of “Needs Work”, they can’t open the proof. Is that by design? Is there a different workflow they should be following to access that feedback?We are on Workfront with Adobe Cloud Storage and using the Frame Viewer for unified review and approvals. Any help would be appreciated.

I’m exploring options for using Unified Approvals to review Word documents stored in SharePoint. Since Unified Approvals doesn’t create approval workflows from linked documents—and Frame.io doesn’t allow native copyediting for Word files—I’m trying to figure out whether anyone has built a workaround.The workflow I’m aiming for looks like this:Author uploads a Word doc to SharePoint. Author shares the SharePoint link with reviewers/approvers via Workfront (names vary by project). Reviewers/approvers receive an approval request. A dashboard displays all pending approvals. Reviewers/approvers open the link and make edits in Word. Approvers log their decision in Workfront.If anyone has tackled something similar—or found a creative solution—I'd appreciate your insights.

I’m trying to create display logic for a field based on the value of a single-select internal lookup field. Does anyone know the validation code I should use? I’ve tried all of these and nothing is working:IF({DE:Lookup field}=”value1”, true)IF({DE:Lookup field}.{name}=”value1”, true)IF(CONTAINS(“value1”,{DE:Lookup field}), true)IF(CONTAINS(“value1”,{DE:Lookup field}.{name}), true) Thanks!

We are looking to create a report that pulls tasks into columns. The task column also needs to be a clickable/interactable link. Lets says I have a task called “Banana Slamma” and I want that task to be pulled in, with a link that takes you to that task page. Is this possible via textmode?

Hi! I have an issue report and I am trying to surface the document link in text mode on the report. I was able to get that, but I would love if the link would download the document on click so users don't have to navigate to the document and then separately download. We are also on the new Adobe Unified Storage - any ideas? 

We have a number of Guest profiles in Workfront Proofing (not the standalone proofing product, we have proofing inside of Workfront) that we need to convert into users. We are needing to do this so that we can update their time zones and date/time display preferences in Proofing so they reflect correctly on their notifications. There are instructions for how to do this in the standalone proof product but not for proofing within Workfront. I am assuming that we can add them to Workfront and that will update their Proofing profiles from Guest to User however, we do not want to do this because these users do not need WF access and providing it would just cause confusion. 

I’m trying to create a project level report that captures issue “wait time” -- the time between when an issue was entered (convertedOpTaskEntryDate) and the date the issue was converted into a project. I cannot seem to find a way to do this. I can create a new field to time stamp the conversion date, but how would I do that? Thanks!

I am seeking feedback on the Proof desktop app, in particular the volume of comments provided by reviewers.We have proofs that can range from 200-300 comments and would like to know if anyone has run into a capacity or tooling lag with the volume of screenshots attached in the proof.

Is there a way within fusion to check if a field is displayed or visible to a user?   Scenario:  Field 1 = “No”Field 2 has display logic if Field 1 = YesResult = Field 2 visible = false Looking for fusion to verify if display logic is showing or not. 

When a specific report is loaded as a part of the dashboard it has different sorting compared to when i access the report directly. In particular, when loaded from dashboard, sorting by priority, descending creates this order: urgent, normal, low, high.When i click on the report from the dashboard, and just the single report loads i get the expected order: urgent, high, normal, low.i have tried removing report from dashboard, then adding again, creating a copy of the report, multiple report edits…Not sure why the display on the dashboard view is different.Thanks for the help.  

Hi everyone,I’m working on evolving how we structure campaigns in Workfront, and I’d love to learn how other marketing and creative teams are handling this—especially when campaigns include multiple deliverables with different workflows and timelines.  Our Current SetupToday, we structure things like this:A requester submits a campaign request Our PM team converts that into an active project using a campaign project template Within that campaign project, we include a task directing the requester (usually a marketing lead) to: → Use the Requests section of the campaign project to submit individual deliverable requests (this is how we link everything) which are then converted into separate projects with unique production + review tasks.For example, an event campaign might include deliverable requests for:Save the Date Email  Save the Date Social Post-Event Email Post-Event Social Print Landing pageChallengeDeliverables don’t always start at the same time or get defined upfront Some can b

We're setting up our first AI Collaborator POC in Preview Sandbox (a Task/Reviewer agent for AP style + editorial review). Rather than using the native Claude connector directly, we're exploring whether our internal AI governance layer (a proxy that brokers access to approved models, including Claude) could be onboarded as a Custom Agent platform instead.A few questions for anyone who's been through this, or from Adobe engineering:When you submit a Custom Agent platform request, what does Adobe's engineering team actually require on the connecting side — a true MCP-compliant server, a specific API/auth contract, or is there flexibility here? Has anyone successfully connected a custom/internal gateway (rather than a named platform like Claude, Copilot Studio, or Writer) as a Custom Agent? What was the onboarding process and timeline like? Is there any published spec for what a Custom Agent endpoint needs to expose (auth, request/response format, streaming vs. sync) ahead of submitting t

Is there a way to sort records in planning alphabetically? Even if you sort the list in the workspace they live in, when you use it as a connected workspace as field options, they don’t sort that way. They stay sorted in the order in which they were created.  

 Hi -We are a small marketing department that just recently launched Workfront. I am looking to put a business case to purchase Anthropic Claude to connect with our Workfront.  We do not have Fusion so would be looking to eventually have it do some manual tasks for us. Has anyone connected yet? What version of Claude did you purchase? How is it volume using it with Workfront/Costs etc? Can you limit it to just a small group of people?I am really trying to include AI as we begin to scale, and this would be the perfect opportunity. Any information would be appreciated to help me figure out this new frontier. Thanks :)KH

Hello!  Hoping someone in the community can help me come up with a solution.  Here’s what I’m trying to do…Situation:  We have a Kanban Board where we will move a Task from a project plan to the Board and then pull the same “analysis” task through multiple columns that have custom statuses that all equate to In Progress (INP).  See screen shot “Fig 1 Board.”  The change in custom statuses and their timestamps are captured in the system updates.  What we need:  We want to be able to show in some kind of report (in Workfront or in Excel or Power BI) how many days the task was at each custom status. I can create a Journal Entry report that shows the time stamps when the card was moved from one column to the next and the custom status changed, but I cannot find a way to export that data or use that data for a calculated field, etc. See screen shot “Fig 2 Journal Entry Report.”  We do not have Fusion and I’ll never be able to get funding for Fusion.  I also realize I can break out the “anal

I have users reporting that every single comment/edit that is posted on a proof is now showing up in the blue notifications box in Workfront and everyone seems to be complaining about how much it is clogging up their updates/notifications and wants it to go away. I have each of their proofing profiles set to “Decisions” and I thought by unchecking the box under their WF profiles - notifications - communication - someone makes a comment on my document might help, but it does not. Is there any way to turn this off so every single proof comment doesn’t hit WF notifications? I don’t know if the change should be made on the user, in WF or in Proof HQ?? Seems like this just started - 

Hi,I am currently showing a calculated field of Active Milestone(s) on a project report.  I have had a request to only show the first Milestone that is active if there are more than one.  Could someone help with the syntax for that?   My current syntax to show the active milestones is:Edit=Text Modedisplayname=Active Milestone(s)listdelimiter=<div>listmethod=nested(tasks).liststype=iteratevalueexpression=IF({project}.{status}='CPL'&&{taskNumber}=1,"Complete",IF({canStart}&&{status}!='CPL'&&!ISBLANK({milestoneID}),{name}))valueformat=HTML Thanks!Heather

Hi - I noticed recently that the bulk assignments in workload balancer now shows everyone in the drop down when i try to assign. The “view all” filter is off at the project level. I am trying to see if there is a way to not show all users, instead just our standard/worker users.

I am trying to remove old approval requests proofs from my approval queue. Does anyone know how to do this?

Is there a way to create a calculated field on a Project form that will automatically pull in the Portfolio Manager Name? I have scoured Experience League and haven’t found a way to do this. I am needing to group a report based on the projects portfolio manager name to display as a chart. Since this isn’t a native project grouping, I’m unable to create a chart based on it unless I can pull it into a custom field. 

I just noticed this morning on one of my prompt based reports for our system that the Project Status Equates with filter is no longer available. Is anyone else noticing this within their instance? I don’t see any documentation stating this change. 

Hi,I am looking at a solution to export all comments that have been made on all proofs of the projects in my event portfolio to extract learnings for my team. Are there any options with excel exports in bulk or any Fusion scenarios that you have found helpful? Additionally an export of all comments in update sections would be great as well. Thank you!

Scenario:    We have a request form has several display logic fields such as if {Field 1} has a value of “A” selected then display {Field 2 } and have the user populate {Field 2}.  The display logic is much larger and more complex but the general idea where there is multiple fields impacted.Our issue is that if someone copies a previous request or changes the response on field 1 in this use case, then field 2 still holds data.    This is an issue as we use calculated fields to help advanced logic and scoring based on field entries and these unexpected hidden values are causing issues with the output of the calculated field.  Is there a way in a calculated field to have some display/visibility logic like ….&& {DE:field 1}.visible=true… or something like that?  Additionally, is there a way to simply have fields that are hidden cleared out upon submission?