Adobe Experience Manager

We’re trying to implement a server to server integration with AEM 6.5 AMS (not Cloud), and I’ve been trying to set it up locally.I got the OAuth2.0 client working (created the client in the OAuth Clients section of the Security Tools.Given the access to the oauthserver service users, created a ScopeWithPrivileges class giving read/write access to the /content/dam path for the service to use.I’m able to get the Bearer token correctly, but when I tried to upload an asset by posting to  http://localhost:4502/api/assets/companies/product-staging/new_test.pngI’m getting a 500with a status.message "status.message": "Can't create child on a synthetic root",the same call using basic auth for the same user (admin), works correctly. Anyone ever done this with the AssetAPI or are we stuck using basic auth for this?I’m half guessing something isn’t right with the ScopeWithPrivilege class, if anyone succeeded knows what we’re doing wrong would be greatly appreciated.

Problem Statement:Would need a mechanism to differentiate and track content processed via machine translation (MT) versus human translation. The primary need is to automatically label and manage content that is machine-translated only (i.e., not reviewed by a human).This labeling should update metadata and file attributes so that both internal teams and end users can easily identify the translation source for any given content.Current LimitationAEM Guides, via the AEM OOTB Translations project, does not provide an event or API to intercept the import of translation summary files.As a result, there is no straightforward way to update labels or metadata during the import process.Expectations:Automated Categorization & Labeling (or Translation Status)A clear mechanism to categorize and label MT-only content at the time of import.Metadata should reflect the translation source (MT vs Human) in a way that is visible and actionableIn short:When the Translation Status is “In sync” there is

The “new” Content Fragment Editor is being promoted as the default editor, but there does not seem to be a way I have found to get this working on our local SDK version of AEM.https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/sites/authoring/fragments/content-fragmentsIs there a way we can use the new editor on our local instance yet?

We are extending the Call for Papers for adaptTo() 2026 to give everyone more time to finalize their talk proposals.The new deadline for the Call for Papers is 26 April 2026. We welcome your technical deep dives and case studies focused on AEM and the underlying open-source stack.Submit your talk: https://adapt.to/cfpPlease note: Early Bird ticket pricing runs only until 12 April 2026. Loyalty Tickets are also available for returning attendees.Tickets: https://adapt.to/ticketsSchedule reminder: To allow arrival on Monday morning without missing content, we’ve adjusted the times this year.Registration starts Monday at 11:00.Conference begins Monday at 12:00.– adaptTo() Conference Team

We have on premise AEM (6.5) author and publiser instance and during last 2-3 days our error.log file is full of following errors on publisher instanceOakState0001 errors09.04.2026 13:37:45.729 *ERROR* [55.32.21.101 [1775734665631] POST /bin/receive HTTP/1.1] com.day.cq.replication.impl.servlets.ReplicationServlet Error during replication: Repository error during node import: OakState0001: Unresolved conflicts in /content/some-page/jcr:contentcom.day.cq.replication.ReplicationException: Repository error during node import: OakState0001: Unresolved conflicts in /content/some-page/jcr:contentCaused by: javax.jcr.InvalidItemStateException: OakState0001: Unresolved conflicts in /content/some-page/jcr:contentCaused by: org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.api.CommitFailedException: OakState0001: Unresolved conflicts in /content/some-page/jcr:content Concurrency warning 09.04.2026 14:50:46.659 *WARN* [EventAdminAsyncThread #9] org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.delegate.SessionDelegate Attempted to perform

Is there an API connection between AEM Assets and the Google Campaign Manager image library? The use case is that images are stored in AEM Assets and need to be copied to the Google Campaign Manager image library for ad serving. Is there an automation that can be built here via an API connection? There is no OOTB utility available. So it seems it would be a custom build solution. 

Business Context:Organizations using Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) often need to synchronize content across environments (e.g., Author to Author, or between regions) during migrations, environment refreshes, or selective content promotions. Currently, this process relies heavily on manual effort, including identifying changed content, packaging it, and installing it sequentially.Current Challenge:To perform a delta content sync, teams must:Manually execute Query Builder searches to identify content paths that have changed within a specific date range. Compile lists of affected DAM and site content (e.g., /content/dam/toyota/vehicle1, /content/dam/toyota/lexus1). Use custom scripts or tools such as ACS Commons Vault RCP (VLT RCP) to transfer the content. Introduce manual throttling (e.g., sleep intervals between package installations) to avoid performance degradation. Coordinate and monitor the process, which increases operational overhead and risk of human error.This approach is time-

Congratulations to ​@Wilson-Faure for your recognition as our AEM Champion of the Month for April! 🙌 🤩Wilson has one of the most loyal fan bases of any AEM expert I know. On top of being wicked smart with Adobe Experience Cloud products, his generosity with his time and kind personality make him a true force within the community. As a Champion, he always goes the extra mile by hosting a User Group meeting, sharing best practices with customers, and, dare I say, "stealing the show" at the karaoke bar?!Wilson, thank you for being you. We’re so happy to have you as an Adobe Champion! 👏  

Hi All,I am trying to render an image from a multifield item using a Sling Model - If I print the below in sightly here’s the result for it - <p>RESOURCE is ${tableList}</p>RESOURCE is /content/projectA/en/home/jcr:content/root/responsivegrid_1161940076/banner_1463578421/customMultifield/item0I try to pass this resource to a custom sling model like below - <sly data-sly-use.slimItem="${'org.projA.web.core.models.customModel' @ resource=tableList}"></sly>When I do the above and try to log it in the init function of sling model customModel, I get the below - @PostConstructprotected void init() { LOG.error("RESOURCE PATH: {}", resource.getPath());}I get the following in the error log - 06.04.2026 23:22:43.593 *ERROR* [[0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1] [1775497963265] GET /content/projectA/en/home.html HTTP/1.1] org.projA.ctcweb.web.models.customModel RESOURCE PATH: /projectA/en/home/jcr:content/root/responsivegrid_1161940076/banner_1463578421 Question - Why is the /customMultif

With LDAP planned for retirement in 2026, what are the recommended alternatives for LDAP-based authentication in AEM? Ideally looking for options that are supported across both AEM On‑Premise and AEM as a Cloud Service.

I wanted to understand whether this is advisable for PII data to be stored within AEM, and what the recommended best practices are.Some of the questions we’re exploring:Is it recommended to store PII in AEMaaCS, even in encrypted form? How does Adobe protect sensitive data at rest and in transit within AEMaaCS? Are there any Adobe guidelines on handling PII in JCR repositories? How is it protected from any external attack threats? Can we implement custom encryption (e.g., using an OSGi service) before storing data? Are there recommended alternatives, such as storing the PII in a secured backend system instead of AEM?Would appreciate insights from Adobe experts and the community on the right architectural approach for handling PII securely in AEMaaCS.

Hi Experts, In my form on the last page (so in my example 3 pages) it will never print the form title and order number.  The following script is in place to determine of there are more pages:  Form.frmHiddenGlobalFields.txtFormTitle::ready:layout - (FormCalc, client)// Set the form title as the combination of title and document ID, separated by colon //First Page (always available)if (HasValue(txtChangedDocument.rawValue) == 0)then  xfa.resolveNode(Concat("#pageSet[0].mst1.FirstPage.frmHeader.txtTitle")) = Form.frmHiddenStaticTexts.lblSalesOrder.rawValue//  xfa.resolveNode("#pageSet[0].mst1.FirstPage.frmHeader.txtTitle") = Concat(Form.frmHiddenStaticTexts.lblSalesOrder.rawValue, ": ", Form.frmHiddenGlobalFields.txtDocumentID.rawValue)else  xfa.resolveNode(Concat("#pageSet[0].mst1.FirstPage.frmHeader.txtTitle")) = Concat(Form.frmHiddenStaticTexts.lblChangeToSalesOrder.rawValue, "\u000d", Form.frmHiddenStaticTexts.lblSalesOrder.rawValue)//  xfa.resolveNode("#pageSet[0].mst1.FirstPage.frm

Hi community,  We want to share details about a significant regression in AEM 6.5 LTS SP2 (Oak 1.88.x) where online garbage collection (GC) causes the segment store to grow instead of reclaiming disk space, along with an available workaround.  --- What is happening  Customers on AEM 6.5 LTS SP2 observed that after running online GC, disk usage was increasing rather than decreasing. Compaction was taking far longer than expected and writing significantly more data than on AEM 6.5 LTS SP1 (Oak 1.78.x) for the same repository.

Hi community,  We want to share details about a critical issue affecting AEM 6.5 LTS SP1 and AEM 6.5 LTS SP2 customers who perform offline compaction using oak-run.  --- What is happening  After running offline compaction via `oak-run compact` followed by two rounds of online garbage collection (GC), AEM instances were throwing SegmentNotFoundException (SNFE) and becoming inaccessible.  Who is affected  Customers on AEM 6.5 LTS SP1 or SP2 who have run offline compaction with an oak-run jar that does not include this fix. This was a blocker for all customers upgrading to AEM 6.5 LTS SP1/SP2.

I am working on AEM 6.5 CS and content hub is integrated.when we upload assets in content hub and it reached AEM’s hydrated-assets folder , it’s dc:title and dc:description value is overridden by extracted values from assets.I want to priorities Content Hub value, is there a way I can achieve this?

Hi all,we are registering API client ID’s in an api.yaml (see https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/implementing/developing/open-api-based-apis) and deploy them with a config pipeline.The documentation describes that for secrets can be used placeholders (see https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/operations/config-pipeline) Something like shown here seems not to work: kind: "API"version: "1"data: allowedClientIDs: author: - "${{MY_AUTHOR_CLIENT_ID}}"We added the values as secrets with “Service Applied: All” in cloud manager configuration but it only works with specific values directly in the api.yaml.Do you know if this not supported kind: API?Best,Mark

Hi Community,I’m looking for suggestions and best practices around importing Salsify product data into AEM, specifically for creating or updating Content Fragments.Current ArchitectureSalsify product data is exported and stored in AEM DAM as .txt files. AEM Workflow is triggered on these DAM assets The workflow: Reads the Salsify JSON Creates Product Pages Sets product properties on the pages based on the JSON This approach is currently page‑centric, driven by workflow logicNew / Evolving RequirementWe are exploring a shift to:Content Fragments as the primary product data source Importing product data via: CSV files where one or more columns contain Salsify JSON, or Directly from JSON assets Mapping Salsify attributes to Content Fragment Models Supporting re‑imports / updates (idempotent behavior)What I’m Looking ForI’d appreciate guidance on:Recommended patterns for CSV/JSON → Content Fragment creation Whether workflows are still the preferred approach, or if: Custom servlets Sc

Dear Team,We are using AEMaaCS, created adaptive form using Core Components, added rules and created theme, which is working fine as standalone form. While embedding the adaptive form to the AEM Page the rules and styles are not loading. Please help / guide in fixing this issue. Thanks

I have a use case where I have two PDFs. 1- Static PDF  2- Dynamic PDF, generated using AEM Form Communication API (https://developer.adobe.com/experience-manager-forms-cloud-service-developer-reference/api/output-sync/).   Ask - I would like to insert static PDF pages after page 2 of Dynamic PDF(generated using communication API) using Document manipulation APIs (https://developer.adobe.com/experience-manager-forms-cloud-service-developer-reference/api/assembler-sync/#section/Introduction).   Any sample code or DDX file, if this can be done?

Hi All,AEM: 6.5.12I’m encountering this issue for the first time. I’m currently using the AEM OOTB Sitemap generator for testing purposes. However, when I try to use the scheduler approach, the job gets stuck and doesn't trigger. please refer below screenshot.  The logs don’t provide much information. I’ve attempted to create the scheduler through /system/console/ConfigMgr and even added a run mode, but it still doesn’t work. However, the "On Demand" approach works perfectly fine. I checked from status-slingsitemap and it appears as scheduled.I've done the the following actions:- re-index from oak:index -> slingSitemap- Adding  the config to be placed "/apps/system/conf/ (didn't work)- Adding runmode config (didn't work).- flushing classloader (didn't work).Is there a way to know if the scheduler got stuck somehow?. if so, do you know the path where I can check it?. Previosly, it was working fine but not sure what changed.