Our operations team is exploring the Cross Project Predecessors feature for a possible use case.
I have taken a look at the pages below but wanted to ask this group if there are any pros/cons you have encountered using this setup.
Thank you in advance.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Cross-project predecessors are a necessity for us for certain product lines.
A few years ago, we split the development of our core annual learning products into front-end and back-end projects. The front-end projects (or modules) contain content development tasks (writing, copyediting, etc.), and each project is akin to a book chapter. The back-end projects (or deliverables) are the for-sale formats of a course and feature different workflows depending on the format.
We use cross-project predecessors to link the modules and deliverables. So, we may have course family AAA, with 8 module projects: AAA24-01, AAA24-02, etc. The Course 1 deliverable might be made up of content from all 8 modules, while the Course 2 deliverable might include mods 1-3, 5.
Having cross-project predecessors does enable us to know when the back-end deliverable projects can/should launch (the system we used prior to WF didn't have cross-project predecessors, and we had to manually track the mod/dev relationships to know when to launch the back-end projects).
Reporting is a bit challenging. Because we have multiple back-end projects relying upon the same front-end modules (and because those back-end workflows can vary), we can't use a single milestone path across the front- and back-ends. One workaround we've used is to create a task report (consisting of the back-end launch tasks where the cross-project predecessors reside) and use a collection to show the cross-project predecessors and their respective completion percentages).
Cross-project predecessors are a necessity for us for certain product lines.
A few years ago, we split the development of our core annual learning products into front-end and back-end projects. The front-end projects (or modules) contain content development tasks (writing, copyediting, etc.), and each project is akin to a book chapter. The back-end projects (or deliverables) are the for-sale formats of a course and feature different workflows depending on the format.
We use cross-project predecessors to link the modules and deliverables. So, we may have course family AAA, with 8 module projects: AAA24-01, AAA24-02, etc. The Course 1 deliverable might be made up of content from all 8 modules, while the Course 2 deliverable might include mods 1-3, 5.
Having cross-project predecessors does enable us to know when the back-end deliverable projects can/should launch (the system we used prior to WF didn't have cross-project predecessors, and we had to manually track the mod/dev relationships to know when to launch the back-end projects).
Reporting is a bit challenging. Because we have multiple back-end projects relying upon the same front-end modules (and because those back-end workflows can vary), we can't use a single milestone path across the front- and back-ends. One workaround we've used is to create a task report (consisting of the back-end launch tasks where the cross-project predecessors reside) and use a collection to show the cross-project predecessors and their respective completion percentages).
This is very helpful! Thank you!
Hi @Kiersten_K,
To the reporting challenges around cross project predecessors @KristenS_WF mentioned, I invite you to consider our Timeline solution, which lets you choose one or more Critical Tasks, set their Path Colors, then view Timeline to "crawl" the resulting multiple Critical Paths through all cross project predecessor feeder projects.
Regards,
Doug
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Views
Likes
Replies