Adobe Workfront

It would be very helpful to have an on/off toggle to allow default schedule exceptions (holidays) to populate on the time off calendars for users who are assigned to that default schedule. Holidays would appear in one color, and user personal time off in a different color, distinguishing the two.  This would prevent users from requesting time off on days that were already holidays, as well as giving users a quick and easy way to see the company holidays without having to set up a holiday “project” and a separate calendar as others have mentioned as a workaround. 

I need to see a report of Tasks and Requests that do not have hours logged by every assignee on each task/request so that we can see what Tasks/Requests are missing hours for which assignees.There’s a thread here that identifies a way for an individual user to see their own Tasks that have not been assigned hours, but I can’t seem to find anything that shows how to see multiple users who do not have assigned hours. Any advice is appreciated.

I am planning to refine and standardize the marketing asset types and associated deliverables used in Workfront. If I delete an asset type, will that fall off past project reporting? Is there a way to just archive an old option on a field and not completely delete? 

Hey hey Workfronters!I’m working on bringing a new team into Workfront and need your advice/expertise. What’s the best way to set up a task with a varying duration?For example: Task A has a fixed date. Task C has a fixed date. Task B needs to start on Task A’s due date and finish on Task C’s start date. The duration will flux as the fixed dates are edited. I’ve tried various predecessors and duration types but nothing is quite giving me what I need. 

Grok and I have been trying to crack this nut for an hour now. (I asked the AI Assistant and….let’s just say there were many 👎🏻s) Figured I’d ask the hive mind and--if I figure it out before anyone else does--I’ll post it here for everyone else.The ask: I want to be able to determine the ID of an approval attached to an issue. The only pieces of data I have are the approvalProcessID (which I know because I have Fusion apply an approval process to these issues) and currentApprovalStepID. No matter what I do with that currentApprovalStepID, I just cannot get to the approval. If I try to use that to search for the APPROVAL object, I get a 400. If I try searching via the ARVSTP object, I get scolded that it’s “...not a top level object and can't be requested directly in internal”There has to be something that both Grok and I are missing here. Any thoughts?

Is it possible to retain the original intra-project ID on a Request that has been routed to a Request queue?We have Requests that are intra-project Requests. These Requests route to a certain Request Queue. We want to find a way using a calculated field or use Fusion to determine the Project that this Request originated from. When we use a calculated field or use Fusion, the Project info for the Request is always showing the Request Queue that the Request has been routed to.Please advise.

Synchrony is seeking an AVP, Marketing Platform Enablement Manager with strong expertise in Adobe Fusion and the application of Artificial Intelligence to modern marketing enablement. The ideal candidate has significant experience enabling enterprise marketing platforms, partnering with marketing, technology, and data teams to operationalize Adobe Fusion capabilities and drive scalable adoption across the organization.Learn more and apply here: https://synchronyfinancial.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/careers/details/AVP--Marketing-Platform-Enablement-Manager_2600256-1

 Hello,We’re looking to add a part-time Fusion contractor to our team to support a few current and upcoming projects.If you’re interested in learning more, please reach out to Trevor at Trevor@syncpointdigital.com. 

Hello everyone,I've a Fusion job where I create a folder in AEM and then through a custom call to Workfront, I add it as a linked folder in the desired project. I do all this in Fusion because I have a business logic that handles how and what folder i need to create and in which project i need to add it.The problem arises when i've to create a new folder inside the Linked Folder created in the previous step.i'm making the following POST request: URL /attask/api/v18.0/DOCFDR request JSON body{"name":"folderName","taskID":"xxyyzz","objCode":"DOCFDR","parentID":"aabbcc"} the error I get in both fusion and postam if I try the same request{    "error": {               "message": "Authorization is required.",               "title": null,               "msgKey": "exception.attask",               "attribute

Hi team,I use Power Apps to automate many of the tasks that we have as part of our projects. To help users access the app direct from Workfront, I have created a custom calculated task field that stings together a URL that will open the app on the page needed with the project loaded. The issue is, the URL is long and takes up a lot of room. Is there a way I can have this URL behind text such as "Go To Power App". Like you would if you were doing HTML (<a href="url">Go To Power App</a>)The calculation I am using is...CONCAT("https://apps.powerapps.com/play/e/10ce04bd-ba11-e353-9800-82af01dab1cb/a/f31e71a2-b125-4314-bcd7-511edf6fd56f?DeepLink=",{DE:SAAT Screen Code},"&PID=",{project}.{referenceNumber})Can I display this URL on each task as  "Go To Power App"? Thanks for your help. 

Hello EveryoneI have a Workfront Search module that returns multiple attachments. The challenge is that I want to send all these attachments in an HTTP form-data request in one module (e.g., to one API endpoint that expects multiple files)  How can I achieve this ?  

Hi Team,We're facing connectivity issues in Workfront Fusion when connecting to a client's Apigee endpoint for SAP integration using the HTTP module, despite sharing the official Fusion IP addresses list for whitelisting.Key Findings: Requests from Fusion hit Apigee showing source IP 52.123.145.90 in logs Whitelisting this specific IP in Apigee immediately resolves the issue and returns successful responses Problem: 52.123.145.90 is NOT listed in the official documentation https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront-fusion/using/set-up-and-manage-fusion/set-up-and-manage-orgs-and-teams/set-up-orgs-teams-and-users/set-up-ip-addresses-for-fusion#add-ip-addresses-and-domains-for-your-datacenter Questions: Does Fusion use additional cluster-specific IPs beyond the documented list? How to get the complete IP range for our specific Fusion datacenter/region? Adobe Workfront US Datacenter 54.244.142.219 52.39.217.230 44.241.82.96 100.20.126.137 34.223.32.4

How to implement logging and monitoring  in Adobe workfront. We have an third party API which provides all logging information.

Since Experience League updated to the new look, some posts are simply gone…This should be a thread called “Case Insensitive API”: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/workfront-questions/case-insensitive-api/m-p/791327#M71355 This should be a thread called “Task Reporting, Updates/Notes List”: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/workfront-questions/task-reporting-updates-notes-list/m-p/791234#M71347Any advice?

I am currently using a document version report to show how many Approved proofs a user has for a certain period of time, along with the number of versions of the proof. Can I calculate the average number of proof version for the user?For example, in this screenshot, can I calculate the average number of proof versions from Kevin by totaling the “Ver” column and dividing the number of proofs (17)? I’m very open to getting this information with a different type of report, if needed.Thanks!

Hi everyone 👋I’m an Adobe Workfront Fusion–certified automation specialist currently exploring contract or full-time opportunities.I’ve built end-to-end Fusion automations around request intake, portfolio/program/project creation, asset-based templates, metadata mapping, and cross-system integrations. Background-wise, I come from finance (ex-Deloitte), so I’m big on scalable, well-governed solutions that actually make business sense.🌍 Timezone-flexible and comfortable working with global teams🤝 Open to freelance, contract, or permanent rolesHappy to share examples, Loom walkthroughs, or just chat Fusion. Thanks!

I thought that it would be fairly straight forwardhour/hourID?billingRecordID=billRecordID&method=PUTThis doesn’t throw any error at all but neither does it actually add the hour into that billing record.I tried the updates method and again, it doesn’t error out but it doesn’t also add the hour into the billing record.hour/hourID?updates={"billingRecordID":"billRecordID"}&method=PUTAnybody able to successfully add hours to billing record via api?

I’m trying to identify Standard access users who are not involved as Assignee to any object except issue and Approval process and who haven't changed any object status.Goal:If a user with Standard access has never performed a Task or Project status change or not been an assignee (excluding comments, document uploads, or approvals), we’re considering moving them to a Light/Contributor license.