Hi Prince, I'm sorry for slow reply to your comment--community platform didn't notify me.  I don't believe we have clients on your exact Service Pack level (and even if we did, you could have run mode differences that impact things in surprising ways).  I haven't seen any customers with this issue i...

We've customized to this requirement before, but unfortunately, it's been a while and I can't recall the precise mechanism we took.  If my vague memory is correct, we had users access the "crop-as-new-image" function via a small custom workflow (accessed via a custom menu button) that leveraged the ...

Hi Mario, What you're talking about is similar to what I'd call an Asset Type metadata concept and it's pretty common--our clients would very commonly have a tag structure under an Asset Type namespace that would include several types of photography (e.g. lifestyle, product, executive headshots), co...

This is really a question for Adobe rather than the community, but my understanding is that the AEM as a Cloud Service is functionally very similar to the latest 6.5 release of AEM.  So it's not as if there's a 6.6 version that is only available in the Cloud Service paradigm and all of the AMS or on...

Unfortunately, this was added with 6.4 and is not available in 6.3. There are solutions, but they involve development to use the API in 6.3 and earlier versions.

Hi Prince, Presume you mean you're having issues permanently adjusting the order or assets (rather than just sorting). If you can't reorder permanently, you may want to confirm that the folder is created as an orderable folder (see folder properties).  If you're having issues on the very top-level f...

This isn't an OTB functionality, but I wouldn't imagine it would be a tremendously hard customization. If you really wanted to keep your effort minimal and keep the user experience close to the OTB Review Task, you could look into adjusting the Render Condition for "Create Review Task" button.  I th...

I don't believe this is possible via configuration.   In theory, anything is possible via customization, but I suspect the level of effort and impact to upgrade path would both be quite high.  

If I understand your question, you're not having issues with implementing the type-ahead, but maintaining the functionality after a manual edit in the metadata schema WYSIWYG editor.  If that's the case, then that's a tradeoff we've encountered and decided to live with.   The revision of custom meta...

This information should be in your metadata export.  Don't have ready access to 6.4 instance at moment, but I believe the answer is the same on 6.5. I think the problem is that the some of replication metadata is not on the metadata node, so it isn't included in your CSV. Not sure if you what replic...