We are looking to cluster our CQ5.3 Author instance. By default this
comes configured to cluster with the Journal Shared. We have recently
upgraded the CRX to 2.2 which allows for Shared Nothing clustering. I
have had a look into this and there doesn't appear to be a way to
"switch" the type of clustering easily. I tried removing clustering
altogether on a test instance, by removing the Cluster entry in the
repository.xml, and this just ends up corrupting the instance. It seems
you have to have ...
No sorry, its in the actual step item details. I can get the Workflow
instance "Start comment" using, ${instance.data.startComment}Its the
comment that actually gets entered into the participant step when the
workflow user actions their inbox. I think I can get the step ID using,
${item.id}That give me something like
VolatileWorkItem_node9_etc_workflow_instances_2015-06-10_model_49688341059757941I
believe the comment is placed under
[workflowinstance]/workitem/metadata.comment , as it is there o...
I am setting up am approval/reject workflow to authorise activations. I
am setting up an email template to send the initiator to let them know
if the activation has been rejected. I would like to include the
"comments" that can be put in the "Participant Step", if they decide to
reject the request. Is there a way to do this? Will the "Send Email"
step pickup the comments from the previous "Participant Step" that
causes the rejection?So far in the email template I have,From: Global IT
activation ...
I am looking to transfer some content between two 5.3 instances, but I
cannot get the import to work. I have tried this in 5.6.1 and I get the
same issue. I have carried the following,Exported
usingC:\Development\export>vlt --credentials admin:admin export -v
http://localhost:4502/crx /content/vault vaultTried
ImportingC:\Development\export\vault>vlt import -v
http://localhost:4502/crx . /Connecting via JCR remoting to
http://localhost:4502/crx/serverCollecting import
information...Installing no...
Sham HC wrote... Another possibility could be SSO but still uses login
token. might be serving stale. Browser cache issue or webserver caching
issue. Hi I did clear the webserver doc cache out and restart it. Also I
don't believe it is stale content as the welcome page is displaying a
user name that has never used the PC in question. This user name seems
to be different every time. It has also indicated that the user is
logged in as Administrator, when that account has never been used.This
only ...
We are currently using CQ 5.4 (in the plans of upgrading), but some of
our users are finding they are opening Firefox, then going to CQ author,
and being logged straight in, but with the wrong user details. This
doesn't seem to occur under IE or Chrome. Anyone else experienced this
or know of a hotfix? If users go to the SiteAdmin it then says the user
is Anonymous and doesnt display any sites. The issue doesn't always
occur even in FirefoxI did notice that the login-token cookie does not
seem t...
Hi Jörg.We do have the latest CRX2.2 which supports Shared Nothing
clustering. But it appears when you "install" CQ5.3 it builds itself
with the old type of clustering, and even though the new version is
available, it doesnt appear to be possible to migrate to this in situ. I
was just wondering if any one had a easy trick to doing this. We
certainly would like to move to a later version of AEM, but this is not
an easy process for us.TBH I cannot get the shared journal form of
clustering working ...
We are looking to cluster our CQ5.3 Author instance. By default this
comes configured to cluster with the Journal Shared. We have recently
upgraded the CRX to 2.2 which allows for Shared Nothing clustering. I
have had a look into this and there doesn't appear to be a way to
"switch" the type of clustering easily. I tried removing clustering
altogether on a test instance, by removing the Cluster entry in the
repository.xml, and this just ends up corrupting the instance. It seems
you have to have ...
I am having trouble getting the forum notifications to work in CQ5.4.
Everything else is working fine.I can create topics and replies etc. I
have noticed in the error log,28.03.2014 15:16:59.180 *ERROR*
[JobHandler:
/etc/workflow/instances/2014-03-28/model_11771317718749671:/content/usergenerated/content/intranet/en_ho/site/home/squiggle4/jcr:content/forum/vsjb-topic_3]
etc.workflow.scripts.collab.log_activity$ecma Could not create comment
activity. Missing author identifier.Looking at the ecma ...
Checking again the instance that doesn't work also has spk2 on. So it is
definitely something in there that's caused the problem. Looks like
something Adobe need to fix
Thanks for the reply1 Removing the cf. Yes it displays the page, but
sort of stops you authoring the page2 Not sure why this would help, but
tried it and it doesn't make any difference3 Not sure why this would
help, but tried it and it doesn't make any differenceI have logged a
support call with Adobe to look into this, but any other suggestions
gratefully received, as this has put a hold on us migrating from CQ 5.4
I have rechecked my investigations, and it appears IE8 does work with a
completely fresh install of AEM 5.6.1. I then tried adding the Security
Pack 1 and the fix for IE11 browsers, and it still worked. As soon as I
installed service pack 2 it broke author with the content finder. We do
have another separate instance we upgraded to 5.6.1 which doesn't have
spk2 on though and that doesn't work either. Looks like I need to do a
bit more digging.
Is there a known issue in AEM 5.6.1 opening pages for authoring using
IE8. According to the supported browsers, IE8 is supported in classic
mode. But on opening the page we are getting a blank screen. If I remove
the content finder from the URL it then works. I have tried spk2 as well
and that has made no difference.Thanks
Ah sorted my problem. It was the access set to the users under the home
folder. It had been set so they only had read access to the profile
node. Just tested a user with jcr:all access and the list is working.
Just need to work out the minimum access I can give the users.
We have setup a tab on the content page properties for one of our
templates. This is to allow an author to manually set the page owner. We
have a field which is to allow the author to pick the name of the page
owner using a text field, which is an xtype of authselection. This
should provide the ability to select from the list of CQ users.This
works when logged in as administrator, but when logged in or
impersonating one of the authors, it only shows that author in the
selection list, and you can...
HelloI am trying to set up a workflow which will intercept page
deactivations from the root level and down 2 levels only. This will
allow the administrator to decide if the the deactivation is authorisedI
am trying to use a launcher, but I am having trouble setting it up. I am
using an Event Type of modified and Node Type of page, but this seems to
be picking up new page creations as well. I assume I need to include
something in the Condition and Exclude fields? Or do I need to start
writing ECM...
Ah found it, its
in,/libs/cq/ui/widgets/themes/default/icons/240x180/page.pngI have
temporarily removed this so that is reverts to a smaller image in my
search mosaic, as per CQ5.4I have tried to override this by creating the
same structure under apps, but that doesn't work. Is there another way
of doing this?
If a DAM item doesn't have a suitable rendition to display, CQ displays
a default icon. Unfortunately in 5.6.1 this image seems to be a lot
larger than the version in 5.4.Where is this image defined and can it be
modified, over-ridden?Thanks
I am just testing 5.6.1 service pack 2. We seem to have an issue that
when logging into AEM Author, that the user name is no longer case
insensitive.I am logging in with an LDAP user. The user ID is stored as
upper case in the LDAP. But AEM does initially recognise the user if
logging in with the user name in lower case. It creates the user ID in
upper case, but then says the username and password are incorrect. If I
do put the user name in Upper case it works. Is this a bug or new
functionality...
Unless I have misunderstood this does not appear to work. See the
attached image. I have a user who is a member of express_default, and
express_admin. With the permissions as shown I cannot move or delete.
This is in CQ 5.3 but I would have thought this is applicable to any
version.[img]permissions.png[/img]
Is it possible to set a page permissions up so that a page can be moved
by a user but not deleted? I am assuming not, as I guess a move is a
copy and a delete.We currently force users to use a workflow to delete
pages so that it can stop any deletions above a set folder level, and so
we deny delete node and child node.Thanks
We have an instance of CQ 5.4 that I am trying to run on java 1.6
instead of java 1.5. This doesn't seems to work though, and we believe
there may be a setting that you have to change, that was set when CQ was
originally installed, to get it to use the jre-1.6 settings instead. I
can see that there are some definitions in the sling.properties file,
which seems to list the classes to use. Is there somewhere I need to
change CQ so that it uses the jre-1.6 classe definition instead of the
jre-1.5 ?...
On one of our development environements for CQ5.3 we have just installed
feature pack cq-5.3.0-featurepack-37434-4. Now for some reason we cannot
delete pages even as administrator. According to CQ this user should
have permissions to do this. Any suggestions? Thanks
Sham HC wrote... Should not be issue unless you have customized OOB
workflow. After migration follow [1] to force upgrade so that you do not
have to worry much. [1] * From crx explorer create/set the
/var/upgrade/status/upgradesExecutor.forceUpgrades property to true.*
Stop and restart the com.day.cq.cq-upgrades-executor bundle from felix
console
http://:/system/console/bundles/com.day.cq.cq-upgrades-executor*
The log shows upgrades progress* When done, delete the
upgradesExecutor.forceUpgrades ...
I believe the underlying structure of how workflows are stored have been
changed from CQ 5.5.We are looking to upgrade a CQ 5.3 instance to
5.6.1. An inplace upgrade would automatically upgrade workflows. But we
are having issues getting the inplace upgrade to work and so are looking
at migrating to AEM 5.6.1 by packaging up content/apps/etc in 5.3 and
importing into 5.6.1Are there any issues with doing this or do we have
to create the workflows from scratch?Is there any documentation on how
the...
