Sorry @KellieGardner apparently i'm not being very clear  This works in the project task column:valueexpression=IF(CONTAINS('Asset:',{name})=true," ",CONCAT({plannedCompletionDate}," - ",{name})) This works in the asset task column:valueexpression=IF(CONTAINS('Asset:',{name})=false," ",CONCAT({plann...

We have a similar need!! We show projects by earliest live date, but then also need the collection of task lists sorted in chronological order. There HAS to be a way to do this! Please upvote this idea! 

Almost - I don't want the list to display:- tasks named "Fusion - Asset Inventory" OR- tasks that include "Asset:"

hey Kellie!I need to keep the "Asset" statement in there b/c it's differentiating the two different task types we have - project column does NOT contain tasks with "Asset:" but the Asset Task column does. I want to also remove the "Fusion - Asset Inventory" parent task from what's showing in the pro...

Hi! I'd like to filter out a specific parent task from showing in a report. However, a filter is not working now that I've combined all tasks into one field. Anyone know how I might manipulate the valueexpression for the Project Tasks + Due Date column to also NOT CONTAIN "Fusion - Asset Inventory" ...

Thanks @VictoriaLinn - thought about this too! The one thing holding me back is the fact that we have required fields currently in the form....which my team wouldn't complete, but the other team would. So, we can't save/submit the form without those being completed. I can always change that, of cour...

I thought about that too, but I am uncertain if request drafts would show up in reporting, which we would need. Do you know off-hand? I can always test

Has anyone ever created a request from a request? Sounds strange, I know, but my team has an opportunity to begin a request with SME's from another team who would essentially complete the remaining details of a request before it is converted to a project. Unsure how to begin this flow and looking to...

Hi @Richard__Carlson  - we use versions in a bit of a different way for interactive proofing. Rather than being true versions, they are multiple days of, say, homepages to proof at a time. Therefore, we'd want them all to be available (unlocked) to review together. This is a timesaving workaround we...

Hey @Rafal_Bainie thanks for the idea! We do have a lot of folks who do not use Chrome, however.