@jon_chen can we please move these votes into this idea?

@jon_chen can we please move these votes into this idea?

Hi there, proof/proof approval reports using $$USER.ID are your friend here. You can have a dashboard that anyone who creates/reviews/approves proofs can use and set the same dashboard for all of these users for their homepage ($$USER.ID wildcard is key here, so you can use it for multiple users ins...

Hi there! Based on your screenshot, it appears you have the access in order to use those statuses, so it's interesting you're having issues selecting a value. Are you experience the same thing when selecting any of the other statuses or just the Ready for Production status?  Sounds unrelated, but tr...

Hmm I haven't seen that yet but in the API Explorer I'm wondering if this is something you could mess with? PRFACT? I also tried looking in a journal entry report to see if anything seemed to be for proof actions (not decision-related) but not seeing anything. May be a question for Support.  

Hi there, yes this is an easy text mode tweak. Go to text mode in your Groupings of the report, and you'll see something like this (I'm in a project report by Group in my example):group.0.iscollapsed=truegroup.0.linkedname=groupgroup.0.namekey=view.relatedcolumn - this is what's putting Project:Name...

I'm still trying to see the light with resource pools as opposed to just using Teams or Groups. I get now that you need them to utilize the Planner. When you associate a project with pool(s), how does that show what % of the project they are involved in? If you have a project with 10 tasks for examp...

I'm just thinking of a client we are looking to use proofs with for his reviews/approvals, but is TERRIBLE at keeping up with his emails. So was entertaining the idea of him using the WF app to review proofs but then didn't know if he would even be able to access it. WF makes it possible for users w...

Having a mental lapse here…you can add reviewers to a proof that don’t have a WF license. But I guess there’s no way for these folks to be able to utilize the WF app to review proofs if they wouldn’t be able to log into the app without having an account? If they have an Adobe ID with the same email ...

Darn this is frustrating. You are correct that there is no wildcard option for email address. Is there any other possible option for you to reference instead? Or to bring in another column for user ID next to the email column and have the wildcard filter search for $$USER.ID instead?