Is there an example of an .xci file posted anywhere? The document mentions what tags to include, but as far as I can tell doesn't show you how to structure the .xci file.  

Thank you for the reply!I'm not sure what's going on with my DOR template, but I only see the first Master Page as an option in AEM.  Here's the structure in Livecycle/Designer, I have two master pages:And here's what I see as options in the 'Place' area of the Document of Record options for a panel...

I'm using the 'Generate document of record' option with an adaptive form.  We made a template in Livecycle/Designer that's working well, but the header is being added to every page in the document of record, which is unnecessary.  Is there a way to set it up so that the header is only added to the f...

I wanted to add one point to the discussion about SSO, from what I've experienced it seems like accounts created via SSO are automatically added to whatever group is alphabetically first in your groups list. It's a little crazy that you don't see to be able to specify this in the SSO setup (if I mis...

Thank you so much for the detailed response and providing a package!  We'll give this a try.  Thank you again!

Thank you!  Apologies, I don't know much about overlays in AEM.  Is there a way to overwrite this template for one specific form, or would I have to make this change globally?  

In AEM forms, we'd like the 'Short description' field to be displayed below the field's label, instead of below the input box itself.  Is there a way to do this with the out-of-the-box fields in AEM?  I looked around for a setting in the form and theme but didn't see anything.   

Is there any way you could post it on this page so that others can benefit?  Thank you so much!

Yeah, it's very strange that styles for each field type (text, dropdown, etc.) have to be consistent across the DOR.

I haven't found a solution yet, I thought maybe updating to Sp16 would help, but tables still look the same in my custom DOR templates:If I use the 'Default' template the table looks correct: