This idea and this one: https://one.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z0000004W7gAAE/detail could probably be combined.

Most proofs in our org are multi document proofs. It really upsets some of our end user proofers if the person creating the proof forgets to turn on the 'combine' button. Having this default to on would save time and headaches.

Thanks for the curated list! For the second to last one (out of office), I'd love see something like this: Sean Sanders | London Drugs

@Matt Marks - That actually is a fair amount of votes relative to the last two year's average. It's incredibly difficult get anything past the threshold anymore unless it's something new that collectively is a big annoyance to most users. If you take a look at all the ideas submitted in the last 18 ...

Hi Susan, The "Share" link, requires a login so it can know who is trying to view the proof (I don't recall all the intricacies of the share button, but the conclusion for us was it was pretty useless except for read only purposes). The best way to do this, would likely be to have the gatekeeper (wi...

Hi Kara, For #1: Assuming your users log their time, this would make a good hour report (probably as a chart). On your filter, in addition to anything else you want to filter out, add Hour Type ID not equal Sick, Vacation so you're only getting work hours. Group the report by Task Name (or Pro...

I have not seen that specific error message (and thus this might not be applicable for your scenario), but I've found that ProofHQ does not sync permission on documents with Workfront. This means that even if you have manage permissions on the project or document in WF, if you didn't create the firs...

Hi Danielle, This is one of those things that 4+ years later (after Workfront bought ProofHQ) it's still painful that it doesn't exist out of the box (unless I'm really out of touch which the capabilities) You could use the API's to do this, but not everyone has the resources for that. If you do, yo...

One thing I found, is the filter doesn't actually work in the preview when editing a form. It does work though on the actual form in all other contexts. Sean Sanders | London Drugs

I don't think there is a way to fix this, except maybe with the API and a server that handles the event subscription of a user change and then put the email back to what it is was before the change. (But that might backfire and prevent them from legitimately changing their email address). You could ...