The same FIELD

We created a group that includes only our Sys Admins. New custom forms have that group added and whatever defaulted in removed. Also - I submitted an item to request that custom form sharing work like Report or Template sharing. Would love to have you visit and vote up! https://support.workfront....

Please make the security for Custom Forms match other Workfront objects like Reports and Templates. Current State: At least one Group must have access to the form, all members of the Group can edit by default. Other people can be given access (which we assume to be view/use) but not edit access. ...

The other answers here are accurate. if you want them to be able to log time and actually close/complete tasks, they will need a work license. We utilize review licenses for a number of contracted staff. The review license allows them to be assigned to a task, and to add updates, and for Workfront t...

I would like to see two enhancements for Notifications. Both are relative to creating projects from templates or attaching templates to existing projects. For templates to be truly useful, you need to pre-assign tasks to people or teams. However, when you do that, the Notification behavior is obno...

Request queues have the potential to solve a big need for us, the problem is you can only add them to a project as an issue. We would like to suggest the ability to add them to a project as a TASK.

The Idea Exchange has been great, but as our community embraces it, I see some opportunities to make it better and more useful. Some suggestions are: 1. Create categories under each topic to better organize ideas and make it easier for people to find items they are really interested in. 2. All com...

I see your point Sara, and I suspect there are multiple ways of making this functionality optional for organizations. :)

I would LOVE that functionality - to simply be able to choose a setting that requires users to use a template to create projects, or alternatively, allow/disallow by Access Level would be FANTASTIC!

For purposes of coverage, as well as on larger projects and corporate wide initiatives, to have co-(or more) project managers. We would like the ability to add multiple owners, either within the project owner field or as a separate field for additional owners. This could be structured similarly to ...