Hi Alyssa,   If you click the little arrow next to the task name header in your project view, it will collapse all tasks in your plan under their parents:     Best Regards, Rich.  

Hi Deborah,   Another thing you could test is using the following text mode:   listdelimiter=<br> valueexpression=CONCAT({user}.{role}.{name},"-",{user}.{name}) listmethod=nested(projectUsers).lists valueformat=HTML displayname=Project Team textmode=true type=iterate   This will display all users al...

Hi Matt,   I can offer a couple of suggestions for you to try. In a template report, you could add a column to your view with the following code that would display all job roles associated with your project template assignments: displayname=Template Roles listdelimiter= listmethod=nested(roles).list...

Hi Kaitlyn,   If your team are deleting the issues after they have been resolved, it's not going to be possible to report on them. Once an object is deleted from Workfront, it is no longer available to be reported on.   Best Regards, Rich.  

Hi Seth,   This feature does not work with proof approvals. It's not possible to delegate approvals or dynamically adjust proof deadlines based on values entered into the time off calendar.   Best Regards, Rich.  

Hey,   So i've just had a play in my instance and ran into the same problem. However, I got it to work by removing  "FIELD" from the text mode. So your code would look like this instead:   linkedname=direct namekey=ccoMaximumDailySendVolumes querysort=DE:ccoMaximumDailySendVolumes styledef.case.0.co...

You're very welcome, glad I could help.    And yes, that calculated field config should work

Hey,   Yes, both of these things should be possible.   For the custom grouping name, you would use the following text mode:   group.1.displayname=INSERT CUSTOM NAME HERE group.1.valuefield=CUSTOM FIELD NAME AS IT APPEARS IN YOUR CUSTOM FORM group.1.valueformat=customDataLabelsAsString textmode=true ...

Hi Robert,   Fusion doesn't have any memory outside of each scenario execution. So whilst it is possible to use a count function to increment a number sequentially, during the next execution of that scenario it would lose all memory of what count was reached and would start from 1 again. . .  If tha...

Hi Gen,   This is down to the role you have on a proof. As a proof creator, you are the proof owner and so have full control of the proof/workflow configuration. To give another user (who is not the owner) elevated access to the proof, they must be set as an author or moderator role.   You can read ...