Using AFCS SDK with Gumbo

[Former Community Member]

Hi,

is there a way to start using the sdk with actual gumbo sdk builds?

I'am running into strange errors. Or is this not supported at this time?

Thanks for any infos or workarounds.

Cheers, Sven

[Former Community Member]

Hi Sven,

  We definitely had tried at some point without problems, but we haven't been keeping up with the latest Gumbo builds - what kinds of errors are you seeing? We can look into them and hopefully get them fixed for the next drop.

  thanks

   nigel

[Former Community Member]

Hi Nigel,

thanks for your help.

At the moment it fails in a very early stage only by describing the AdobeHSAuthenticator.

This class ist also not in the code completion by adding the correct 'rtc' namespace.

Description    Resource    Path    Location    Type
In initializer for 'mxmlContentFactory', type com.adobe.rtc.authentication.AdobeHSAuthenticator is not assignable to target type Array or target element type mx.core.IVisualElement.    AFCS_Demo01.mxml    AFCS_Demo01/src    line 14    Flex Problem

Any idea?

Thanks, Sven

[Romain_Lenoel · Accepted solution]

Hi Sven,

Is your AdobeHSAuthenticator in a Declarations tag ?

In Gumbo, all non visual elements must be in the Declarations tag.

Romain

[Former Community Member]

Another possible way to workaround this would be the form I happen to prefer for Authenticating :

<rtc:ConnectSessionContainer ... >

<rtc:authenticator> <rtc:AdobeHSAuthenticator ... /> </rtc:authenticator> </rtc:ConnectSessionContainer>

nigel

[Former Community Member]

Damn Sorry heavily switching between SDK 3.x and 4.x and i forgot that <Declaration/> Tag.

Thanks for the hint!

Cheers, Sven

[Former Community Member]

Hi Nigel,

why you prefer this way?

What is the difference or advantages not seperately define the Authenticator?

Thanks, Sven

[Former Community Member]

I like it because you don't have to name the Authenticator with an id property, and you don't have to bind in the authenticator w/ curlies. I guess I just like the purity of having the session "contain" the authenticator.

nigel