Hi,
At the moment, our email communication is managed through Eloqua. However, we have noticed a discrepancy between the click-through numbers recorded in Eloqua and those in Adobe Analytics. Specifically, Eloqua is reporting significantly higher numbers.
To provide more context, each email contains unique identifiers called UTM tags, which we capture using an eVar. The values assigned to this eVar in Adobe Analytics do not align with the values recorded in Eloqua.
Interestingly, I conducted a test by creating an email in a staging environment to monitor its click-through activity. In this particular case, the numbers in Adobe Analytics perfectly matched those in Eloqua. Unfortunately, we are uncertain about the cause of this inconsistency with the other emails in the production environment. Please guide if you have any idea.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Assuming there are no issues with URL campaign identifiers not being in place or getting stripped out, the difference in email tracking between Eloqua and Adobe Analytics is due to their different methodologies for measuring the email "click". Eloqua measures the initial clickthrough of the link, while Adobe Analytics requires the user to clickthrough on the email and then for the Adobe full image request to render and fire. Since you tested both systems and the numbers matched, this indicates that under normal user conditions, the email tracking appears sound despite the methodology differences.
Assuming there are no issues with URL campaign identifiers not being in place or getting stripped out, the difference in email tracking between Eloqua and Adobe Analytics is due to their different methodologies for measuring the email "click". Eloqua measures the initial clickthrough of the link, while Adobe Analytics requires the user to clickthrough on the email and then for the Adobe full image request to render and fire. Since you tested both systems and the numbers matched, this indicates that under normal user conditions, the email tracking appears sound despite the methodology differences.
In addition to this... The clicks through Eloqua, if it's like other newsletter tools, track directly into a database...
Generally:
Newsletter (Link) > Middle-ware page that collects data > Immediate Redirect to your Site
You don't generally notice the middle-ware, but it stores directly into the DB - this won't have your bot filters, internal IP filters, or be subject to the same "opt-out"/block analytics tools that people have configured....
Of course, once the user ends up on your site, those conditions above that could prevent tracking are all in play (assuming the users didn't cancel out before your tracking loaded like Brian mentioned....)
There will always be difference between different sources... what matters is that the trends follow similar patterns over time... when numbers go up, they go up everywhere, when numbers go down, they go down everywhere....
Then you have to choose which of those items to be your "source of truth"... Adobe, having your bot and IP rules in place, and being map-able to your other data is probably going to be the one you choose.. but monitoring both is always a good idea.
There are a few possible reasons for the discrepancy between the click-through numbers recorded in Eloqua and those in Adobe Analytics.
To troubleshoot the issue, you can try the following steps:
If you have tried all of the above steps and you are still unable to identify the cause of the discrepancy, you can contact Eloqua or Adobe Analytics support for help.
In addition to the above, here are some other things you can check:
If you have checked all of the above and you are still having problems, you can contact Eloqua or Adobe Analytics support for help.
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Views
Likes
Replies
Views
Like
Replies