Product Communities

Being able to select Email Operational as a Filter and as a Row within Revenue Explorer would make it easier to filter just marketing emails and to see the performance of Operational Emails without having to rely on naming convention.

Before the most recent release, I could right click a document to get a link. I could easily paste this link into Tasks, Issues, emails, etc to make it easy to point users to a specific Document. Evidently this was a beneficial side-effect previously that went away during the most recent release. Because it was not a "feature", it is not considered a defect.Please add this ubiquitous webfeature to right click an object and obtain a hyperlink for easy sharing!

This is strictly a convenience/aesthetic thing, but it would be great to see the full name (or at least more of the name) of Data Elements (specifically in the Adobe Analytics extension in rules). Right now it's something like this: It would be nice for it to instead be like this:(for the record, I mocked that up by taking a guess and changing the class on that field from "coral-Textfield Field--short" to "coral-Textfield Field--long"- so the CSS for this already exists:))

Currently it appears that the only email notifications that are customizable are the reminder notifications. https://support.workfront.com/hc/en-us/articles/217220937-Configuring-Email-Templates I would like the ability to create custom email templates in Workfront that can include relevant custom form data in the body or subject that are triggered by certain events such as project completion, not just reminders.

The "Work on It button" is the biggest issue I have with training new users on Workfront. Why is there a Work on It button in the task assignment emails that go out when a project is first changed to current? The Work on It button appears even if the task has predecessors blocking it. If they click on that button it locks the task timeline so that they will no longer know if the predecessors tasks are running late or early. Yes I've been told to make special dashboards for my team so they never even see the My Work but that does not fix the emails that go out, also my team likes the My Work interface they hate the view of reports that look like excel lists.

Currently, when sending out reports with repeating deliveries, only the detailed report can be sent. The ability to send out reports with either the summary tab or chart tab selected would be of benefit. Additionally, It would be useful to be able to send out Dashboards with repeating deliveries as well

It seems that disabling ClickMap in the Analytics Extension is not enough. You actually have to modify the AppMeasurement.js (which only works if you are not using the CDN): Stopping Activity Map Link TrackingPlease ad an option to really disable it through the UI.Duplicate of: Ability to Turn Off/On ActivityMap Module in Adobe Analytics Extension

For smart list subscriptions, it would be nice if we would be able to edit the link expiration time frame to more/less than 4 days. Each subscription could have a different amount of time that you want it to be able to be viewed.

Hi Adobe, We had an requirement to extract details of all segments including destinations names if the segments are mapped to any destination.We observed that using “includeInUseStatus=true” parameter in  https://api.demdex.com/v1/segments/?includeInUseStatus=true returns an extra object to the JSON “inUse” with a Boolean value. Now to fetch the mapped destination id’s we got to loop through all segments (sid’s) which increases the load to the server also time consuming.  Please find the example request below.https://api.demdex.com/v1/segments/xxxxxxx?includeInUseStatus=true : Here the same parameter being passed to the request URL along with segment ID returns associated destination ID’s. It would be great if “mappedEntities” object is included in the JSON response without segment ID being passed in the request URL (First URL) to avoid multiple cURL request to the server. Regards,Pradeep

There appears to be an issue using certain systems as sFTP hosts, and some systems that may be desirable or suitable to act as a host support REST APIs but not sFTP (e.g. Marketo). Please add the ability to define new host configurations via extensions so that extensions can be created to support various environments in which libraries could be hosted. No assumptions should be made with respect to how files should be sent to the host. For example, Marketo doesn't support real folders, so it's not possible to use Launch's native folder/file structure present in zipped libraries.

Similar to Make the data element field wider (Analytics Extension), but for rule names.Rule names can be thousands of characters long (as proven in this blog post), but the input field is too short to show anything more than a few tens of characters.

1. The Revision Publish Status should be indicated in the compare revision.2. The Name of user made changes to Rule should be visible.3. JS Minification should not be applied for the codes loading in Sync - eg: if the rule is in Page Top or if we provide a custom library in Adobe the code gets minified - for difference checker this is not needed.

Currently, proof decisions are limited to 4 items and we would like to see an enhancement where you can either expand the limit to a greater number or have the ability to apply different sets of decisions by Workfront group or team. I think the latter may be difficult given the current architecture between Workfront and Workfront Proof but still would like to propose it.Since we are limited to just 4 decisions, the challenges are the following:Legal/Compliance have other decisions that are needed but cannot be added due to the limitationUsing proof workflows with these decisions may make sense from a Compliance standpoint, but if we want other groups let's say our Creative team to use proof workflows, the decisions are limited to what we initially created from a Compliance lens, so it makes no use/sense to themReasons can be added to the decisions as some sort of workaround, but this gets challenging to not only manage but require the users to do an extra step rather than one simp

Giving Admins the ability to manipulate project overview custom forms. The project overview default form I know that its native but system admins should have the ability to manipulate it and remove fields.

Being able to manipulate the New Project button based on access level, Forcing use to create projects using only templates.

When using the box integration to upload files, the search feature does not allow the ability to search for folders only files. This is not ideal when you have lots of folders in your box account and you need to find a specific one.

Currently Workfront provides only the option to revoke all API keys. The request for revoking a single API key results in revoking all keys and re-issuing them afterwards. This can be a quite complex procedure if Workfront is highly integrated with other business applications. To improve availability of API access and API key management in enterprises and enable granular security actions a better API key management is needed. A first step would be the option to revoke single API keys without impacting other API keys used.

It would be great to be able to have Task deadlines populate in Microsoft Team calendars.

Currently we are unable to add the specific end users planned hours for tasks in the home tab. We can show the tasks planned hours as a whole or the primary assignments hours for the task, not not the specific user who is viewing their home. If the assignments object was available as an object as a drop down option when editing the home tab in the layout templates, it wouldn't be an issue.

When converting a Request to a Task, having the ability to assign, set status, and select dates in the overlay/popup window as is done with converting to a Project.

In Salesforce Lightning, there is the standard object Opportunity Contact Role.  Standard fields from this object appear in the Opportunity information in Marketo, but it would be great to be able to sync custom fields as well.  Right now there is no way to do this in Marketo, and we're having to sync an entirely custom object to retrieve the relevant information.

It would be no nice and easy if we could get the activity QA URL from API instead of having to log-in to the UI to get it every time. 

We load Target through Launch and configured Launch to use different analytics report suites based on which environment it is (Dev/Stg/Prd).  For example, all analytics from the Dev environment goes into the Dev report suite.  It would be great if we can pass the report suite from Launch to Target so that the analytics can go into the report suite for that particular environment.  Right now you manually configure which report suite to use, so we have to change it from environment to environment and is very inconvenient.

Our developers do not like the excessive number of calls required for each regional mbox inside of our SPAs, however they like the added structure of regional mboxes for offers and personalized content. It would be nice to be able to return regional mbox content setup in the Form Composer via the global mbox. For example, a list of mbox names could be passed as parameters to the global mbox for a particular page/route. The global mbox could return the content for each of those mboxes listed in a single response instead of using multiple regional mbox calls. This should be an optional setting for the experience.

It would be beneficial when setting up a smart list subscription that we had an option to select the minimum number of leads required in order to trigger the list send for that day. This would be useful for exception reporting. For example, I created a smart list to catch all records who are missing a Country Value. Now usually in my database, 100% of the records have a country value, so I don't really care to get a subscription report reminding me that there are still only 0 leads in that report. I'd like to only be sent an email via subscription if that number is 1 or greater. is this possible?