Product Communities

Currently there is the Estimate AT Complete (EAC) formula field at the project and task level.It would be great to have an Estimate TO Complete (ETC) field for either hours or dollars at the project level at a minimum (task would be nice too, but not a need to have). To differential the two, Estimate at Complete (EAC) is the total cost of the project at the end, while the Estimate to Complete (ETC) is the cost required to complete the remaining workHere's an example based on dollars, but the same could apply for hours:You have a project with a budget of 100,000 USD and a duration of 12 months. 6 months have passed, and you have spent 60,000 USD. Upon closer view, you find that only 40% of the work has been completed. Your project is expected to perform with the same cost. Here's how to find the Estimate to Complete (ETC) for this project. Budget at Completion (BAC) = 100,000 USD Actual Cost (AC) = 60,000 USD Planned Value (PV) = 50% of 100,000 USD = 50,000 USD Earned Value (EV

At the moment the starting point for any new library is the 'upstream resources'.  However, we are finding situations where we want to use a library that is in development as the starting point.  The only way to achieve this seem to be to recreate the setup of the other library by manually selecting the same revisions - unfortunately, this is time consuming and prone to error 😞 Please can you consider introducing an option to 'copy' a library in development to use as the starting point for a new library? 

When using a type-ahead field on a report it should take into account filters set on the report. E.g. the report is on a dashboard set on a project, the data is correctly filtered based on that project but the task type-ahead still shows all tasks on all projects instead of only the ones on this one.

we have been using Analysis workspace on dashboards within our office.  It would be nice to have an auto-refresh setting.  i.e. every X seconds.  In doing so, it would be nice if Adobe's session time would be extended so it wouldnt log you out, or only ask you to login on next action.

As part of layout templates, we can define what the user sees in the Task Details Overview, however, options do not include any of the agile fields - specifically Estimate (points). This is not a custom form, so cannot be added as additional information to the task details tab either. The ability to add the specific agile fields here to provide all information in one place about that task feels like an oversight and would be very useful for our technical team, who constantly have to go back to the project view or story card to see the estimate. Thanks

Hi Team, if we are running multiple activities on the same page, at the same location with different priority then we are seeing the impression count increase for both the activities even though the visitor sees only high priority activity.Example : consider home page hero banner, if we are running multiple activities with different priorities served on the hero banner. even though visitor would see high priority banner the impression count increases for both the activities, can we fix it? i.e. reporting number should increase only the activities that visitor is seeing. 

Being able to search only on Activity name or URL is limiting. It would be helpful to have other search field dropdowns. Searching on things like audiences would be very helpful in finding everyplace where a particular audience is being used.

When writing more complicated rules-based audiences it would be helpful to have a NOT or ANDNOT operator to be used. Additionally, providing an editable code view (similar to how Audience Manager allows) could allow alternate ways to write logic beyond the UI. 

The prefetchContent API from AEP SDK currently gets offers from Target. However, the response from the callback function seems to only contain just the offer content from the matched Target activity. We should be able to get activity id/name, experience name, etc. somehow, just like how Response Tokens work with at.js for Web. This API doesn't seem to currently exist in AEP SDK.

Seeking to have different views per project. For projects where we are tracking at a milestone/program level, we'd like a shorter view then the one in our project view.

WF Help article states: You can import large numbers of objects into Workfront using kick-starts. However, consider the following limitations: You cannot update information on records that already exist in Workfront.You can import only new records and their information. Is an update/update-insert capacity via quick start in development? This would be pretty great!

We'd like to see a full audit trail of user activity including: What objects a user accessedWhen each object was accessedWhat updates were made on the objectAll login activity so we can run reports on who logged in and how many times for a given time periodHow much time a person spent logged inEtc.

We need to use Queue Topics to enter new issues, which is fine for me as an admin or planner when I am setting up a project. But my users do not want to do this.The Issues view is currently set up with Groups, Views, and Filters to show exactly what the users need to see and edit. It would be SO MUCH EASIER for them to create a new record, pick from the drop-downs, hit Enter for another one, etc etc. Just like on the Tasks object. I have one team who is not going to use Workfront because of this, and I am having a hard time getting them back.

We often have need for very specifically-formatted forms to be created and curated for legal purposes, and while uploading a document is normally fine, there are many fields of information from these docs that would be wonderful to track in reports across numerous departments.We'd love to see a feature that would allow for a formattable custom form (allowing for multiple uses of some of the same fields, in a few cases), so that we can enter data, submit form for approval, and report on data all within Workfront.

Our organization has a need for fixed proof deadlines that are not pushed out 30 minutes each time a new proof is uploaded. Ideally, proof deadlines that have not passed yet would remain fixed. It would save internal creative teams from having to update the proof stage deadlines each time a proof was uploaded.

When copying a proof, currently the only options are to Create a new version of the existing proof orCreate it as a new proof. Our request is to have a 3rd option be the ability to create a new version on a different proof. The reason for this is that we have 2 copies of a proof - 1 for internal creation, 1 for the client. When the client makes all their comments on their proof, we want to copy over their comments into our internal proof - i.e. by creating a new version from copying their proof. So right now, we're dealing with 3 copies now: 1 for internal creation1 for client review,and now 1 for client comments to internally discuss (to then apply to #1) By being able to upload the "copy" directly onto our internal one would save time and create efficiency. There may be other use cases, though this is one reason for a client review process.

It would be useful if we could have a way of stopping Timesheet approvers from approving the timesheets if the hours were rejected by the project owner.

I would like WF to have the ability to automatically display the total on hold time a project has been on (in days). This will help us to track and monitor how long a project has been on hold and determine if it should be cancelled or not. Thanks, Nick

Under 'person actions' - it would be super helpful to be able to call a webhook directly.  Current state, I have to create a campaign to call the webhook, and then request that campaign, when testing a webhook.

It would be super helpful to have the ability to create a Dashboard that features External Workfront One Pages. For example, create a Collaborator/Requestor Layout that contains a Dashboard which displays the Collaborator Training Page from Workfront One. This is currently not possible because, as Support shared with me, the "Workfront One site currently attaches an X-Frame-Options header that prevents the page from being embedded in an iFrame for security reasons". It would be ideal if this restriction could be removed.

Some users do not want their work list to be sorted by anything so would prefer a 'None' option to be added to the Sort By list

We are really struggling with having to filter to only see the list of tasks we need to approve. We much preferred the separate tab for Approvals in the My Work area and it takes extra clicks to view just approval requests. We also need it to be clearer which is an approval request and which are approvals i've submitted.

I would like to see a feature where the user and admin can set which days email notifications are being sent. For example, the user can choose to not receive notifications on the weekends. Instead those notifications can be saved to send on a different day or in a daily digest.

When you use an inactivity filter like has not visited webpage, the only criteria to use when you can type english is "in past 3 months".  Need to add in "past before" like for an active time base filter.  IE visits web page is any is in the past before 10 minutes.  It is easier to bucket leads for the purpose of actinng n what leads to attach first.   .

I would like to be able to centrally manage a rule/data element and have the change automatically distributed across multiple properties.   We are managing several properties and have found that we have many common rules/data elements.  When we change how we want them to work we have to manually edit each individually or do a lot of copying between properties. I would envisage a separate area to manage these common rules/data elements.   Within each property, there would be an option to add a centrally managed rule/data elements.  If a centrally managed data element was added to a property it would appear read only, apart from the ability to delete it.