Product Communities

As a user who has to timesheet, I want Workfront to remember the state of collapsible elements on the timesheet, so I can create the view which makes it easy for me to find where to put my time on.

When running a report that has prompts, you have to rerun the report each time to click on a hyperlink to a project, task, issue, etc. because the link does not open in a new tab. Yes you can us browser controls to open in a new tab but as soon as you forget you have to start all over. Not a great user experience.

The relatively new feature of templates in Workspace is good, and it is nice to have some standard built-in standard templates to begin with.But over time every one using Workspace will have built customised templates, rendering the standard built-in obsolete.Can you please make an improvement, making it possible for users or just admins to hide the built-in templates?Thank you!---------Created by suggestion from an Adobe employee here:Hide Standard templates? ---------

It would be incredibly helpful to have a "Like" or "Agree" button in WF Proof. If one reviewer leaves a comment, others who still need to review/approve and have the same opinion can click Like or Agree rather than having to repeat the same sentence/statement. This functionality was available in other system I've used and was the #1 rated feature by all approvers.

When loading large scenarios, after it first loads you can zoom in and start working....clicking on modules etc, but then after a while (5 to 10 seconds maybe) it then snaps back to a fully zoomed out view, requiring you to again zoom in and find that area again. This seems to happen after it has gone through and done some kind of post-load check of all the modules.It's not so noticeable with smaller scenarios as they load faster, but on bigger scenarios it can really slow you down and cause frustration when you go in and out of edit mode and this keeps happening.

It would be useful when creating a variable in Fusion if you could define its type (string/array/object). Currently if you want a variable to be an array you need to set it to be an empty array, or do a merge function including an empty array. This is not intuitive and not as user-friendly as if you could define the type.

Currently when a user has manage access to a project, they inherit manage access to any issues in that project - note: they inherit access, they do not get their own manage access block in the Sharing on that issue, even if they entered that issue and/or they are the primary contact on that issue.But if that issue is then moved to another project, their inherited access level changes to whatever access they have on the new project. They do not maintain their manage access to an issue that they created.We have a team who creates issues in a set of project their team owns. They gather information on those issues and when they are ready for our production team to work on those issues, they move the issue over to campaign projects that our production team owns.Once those issues are moved to the correct campaign, they then need to change the status so an approval process begins. But since they've lost the access level they had from the original project, they can't change the status.

I created a report to identify a specific type of document. With that list of documents, I need to apply a custom form to those specific documents for reporting purposes.Currently I am applying the custom form to the documents individually. As you can imagine this is a time-consuming tasks.Allowing to bulk edit documents will definitely save me a lot of time.

Currently you aren't able to upload zip files which is a big issue when dealing with certain files that need to stay linked to function (HTML, mechanical print files, etc.). Can we remove this limitation?

Bonjour, est-ce que c'est possible de rajouter une fonctionnalité qui permettrait d'exporter les données qui sont présentes dans le custom object ? Actuellement, il n'est pas possible d'exporter un custom object comme cela est possible pour les tables leads ou company.

Right now, to my knowledge, there isn't a simple way to mark a task as complete when you are in a project. In your home area there is a button to mark as done and we would love that feature when you are in the project itself. You either have to edit the task and mark as complete which, or you have to type in 100%. The way it is now creates more work to just mark something done.

I am configuring WF for an international NPD team. They have project managers that work in specific areas of the business (i.e. Lighting vs. Wiring). It would be great if the Portfolio or Program manager could start a project from a template with a specific PM Role Defined, and then have it provide the list of potential PM's that meet that specific role. Project Manager Lighting, Project Manager Wiring. Instead of just the role Project Owner, we could put in the template Project Owner Wiring and then when the project is being created, it would show a list of Project Owners that corresponded to that particular job role. Instead, they are going to see the entire list of potential PM's...

When adding a calculation/formula to a custom field the "?" hover over shows the formula. I do not need my users to see this data. Would like to see this removed (or a function to remove it) from the view when hovering over the ? on a custom field.

My current client has projects that need to be able to plan work based on job roles that are in a specific region, specific business line and specific job role. (A project that needs to be executed in Hungary, for a XX product line with a XX Resource)... The projects needs to be able to identify the roles on a task for planning. If we had job role pools, we could create a pool of job roles specific to a region and business line and those roles would be available for the PM to assign to tasks in the business case development and task assignments during planning. Otherwise, we have to create a complex acroynm scheme to identify the specific job role so that when we are doing a more strategic planning of resources, the allocations are appropriately reflected, without a lot of overhead to maintain the list of job roles.

Right now even with "print only my view" it prints all tasks even if you are only displaying parent tasks. Would love to just print Gnatt chart view of Parent Tasks

A Project approval should have the ability to notify non-approvers as well to keep them informed of status change. Would also be helpful to notify the person who triggered the approval when the approval is complete (approved or not)

I would like to be able to add a filter to a report with repeating delivery so that it only sends out if the report contains information. For example I have a report showing issues which have been waiting for approval for more than 1 week. Sometimes there are no issues overdue, so I do not want Workfront to send out an empty report.

The ability to extend the durable unsubscribe functionality to additional fields. Durable unsubscribe is explained here (https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Durable+Unsubscribe) and unsubscribes all records which share an email address, if that email address is unsubscribed.   The option to apply this to additional fields would be extremely useful in an instance where you have several brands (with a shared customer base) and are using custom unsubscribe fields.   With privacy laws focusing more closely on consent, being unable to set up this functionality with custom fields is a serious constraint.

Currently the SPI Index does not function properly for tasks that start later than intended. For example, if I have a Baselined task of 1 week duration (40 Planned Hours) that was supposed to start 2 weeks ago but hasn't started (0% Complete and 0 Actual Hours). The SPI=0 (correct). But if I change the Start Date to today or greater (which is what a PM should do for tasks that didn't start on time) the SPI changes to 1, indicating the task is on time (it's really 2 weeks late already). It should be 0 until a % Complete is entered and then be calculated on the original start date. It appears the SPI doesn't use the Baseline when calculating Planned Hours Scheduled to Date. It is using the current (new) Planned Hours Scheduled, which is technically incorrect. From your Help Screen: SPI = (Total Planned Hours x % Complete) / Planned Hours Scheduled to Date* *If Planned Hours Scheduled to Date = 0, SPI = 1.

It would be nice to have a "Select All" for multi select dropdown lists. It can be extremely time consuming if you want to select a lot of values.

It would be great if you could see more than 7 projects at once in the Enhanced Analytics flight plan, or if it would display all the projects in the image export as it does in the Excel export.

It would be helpful if deleted Programs could be restored from the Recycle Bin, mirroring the ability to restore Project and Document objects. We store information on a Program's Custom Form and that data is currently lost when a Program is (mistakenly) deleted.

Lenovo needs the ability to refresh a “sandbox” MSD environment from a “production” MSD environment and have the native sync continue to work in Sandbox Marketo (without having to migrate to a net new Marketo instance).  Lenovo refreshes the “sandbox” MSD environment from “production” MSD twice annually via the process documented here:  https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/power-platform/admin/copy-environment.  It is our understanding that “refreshing” an MSD instance like this results in having to provision a net new Marketo instance and having to do a migration from the “old” Marketo Sandbox instance to the new one - and this process is too time consuming to complete twice a year.  We understand that this functionality is available for Marketo’s native sync with Salesforce but not with Dynamics.

We have the ability for users to delete issues and tasks with logged hours turned off. However, this does not stop a user from deleting the entire project, issues and tasks included. We would like the ability to disable project deletion if any of its objects or the project itself has logged time.

Description - The ability to compare this week to date with the equivalent last yearWhy is this feature important to you - YoY comparrisons important to understand business performanceHow would you like the feature to work - custom date range builderCurrent Behaviour - currently you can only achieve this by minus a number of days, this then fails when its a leap year as there are a different number of days in the year.  The current tool doesnt allow you to minus a set number of weeks in this situation.  When you say start of current week minus 52 weeks and end of current day minus 52 weeks it gives you a date range that is impossible.  The end date being the day before the start date