Product Communities

Missing info about Which user has created any new custom Expense type.Its a great info once added in the system. Which can tell us who created which type of expense in Set up.

Description - You can select the totals in the column headers and graph them.  But, those column headers will always graph the sum total of the unfiltered data. Filtered data will give you a total in the header of a column. But, when graphing the visualization, it will still graph the total of the unfiltered data. The headers won't graph only the filtered data. Why is this feature important to you - Often I would like to graph filtered data to see totals, but still have a table below which shows the data broken down by value. This feature would be helpful for seeing totals over time for filtered data at a glance.How would you like the feature to work - When I filter data in a table, all graphs sourced from that table should reflect the filtered totals.Current Behaviour - Today, when I filter data in a table, graphs that are sourced from the totals row of the table still reflect the unfiltered totals.

Either via comments object or a separate request. We are running reports for our client and have hundreds of proofs to report on. Currently the only way to do this is to manually count which comments have the resolve action applied.

I would like to request that the Objects "Users" and "Hours" be capable of being references together on reports / custom forms. My company has be trying to build utilization and time tracking reports and not having these Users relate to their Hours is making this very difficult. Please make them apart of the same interdependency or hierarchy. Thank you.

Ability to highlight project/task priority and show visibility on the workload balancer. This will help identify projects or tasks that should move up or down on the schedule without going back to the actual project/task to understand the priority.

If you have a lot of approvals to review and check, each time that you click approve on a task you get a pop-up that says Success! then you have to click an X to close that box. Remove the pop-up notification of Success! and the need to close it.

Email notification for a project manager or project owner when someone makes a comment on the proof - not just available for the person who uploaded the proof initially

It would add tremendous value and flexibility if we could have a custom filter in the Work List. For example, I'd like to be able to add another filter level, in addition to those that are already there out of the box, that would allow me to add "program=XYZ, etc.

When using automated proof workflows, would love the ability to be able to add a custom subject line to the template instead of having to enter this in manually when creating a new proof. Our traffic team is repetitively entering the same key words in manually for our external vendor proofs for approval. Sometimes, we miss inputting the key words since this is an extra step from our normal process for internal proofs. Our Internal teams also rely on these subject lines to be able to filter out external vendor proofs in their email inboxes.

In Workfront Classic, there were multiple ways for you to see which versions of a document were sent to DAM from WF and are not available in New Workfront Experience.In Workfront Classic on the Documents tab of a project, I would be able to see all the versions of a document in the Summary side panel on the right and the lion head would appear next to each version that was sent to DAM. Now, I have to open the Document Details page and go to the All Versions tab to see which specific versions were sent to DAM.On the Documents tab in the Project, the lion head will appear next to the filename if the most recent version of the document was sent to DAM but I need more detail into which versions were sent to DAM.

Currently there is no way to make an audit what happened to a document's metadata and when except that a new version has been uploaded.We have a custom integration where this could have been a very useful thing for troubleshooting.But also it's essential if we have a dispute.

Copy or move custom forms between any type of item so long as there is a custom form for that type. i.e. if you're moving a custom form from an issue to a task, there would need to be a task version as well. But, the ability to move them around like you can with documents would be massive.

The document tab within projects and tasks normally shows the number of documents (NWE).But when collapsing the left navigation to an icon, there is no longer a document count.Users have expressed how handy it would be if the count could still be displayed when collapsing the left navigation.

Description -When I'm logged in, in the Debugger extension, I expect to see the eVars, props and events with their friendly name, instead of their number. This is not happening, even though I'm an admin.Why is this feature important to you -Ease of debugging. 

Hi all,   I have an internal user who wants to see all emails that go out at the time in which they go out (not sending a sample). The only workaround to this is by creating duplicate emails (assets), and duplicate smart campaigns. I would say we could use the same smart campaign and add choices for Email Address is (send to X person, etc.), but we are using the choice section for Random Sample A/B Testing. My point, overall, is that this becomes a major headache when you need to do, a Newsletter, for example. We don't have our segmentation up yet, and not sure how granular segmentation gets on an Email Performance Report. This is why we have separate emails and smart campaigns set up - i.e. Japan Email, China Email, Korea Email, Australia Email, Singapore Email, and India Email. If I need to send to the internal user without her being skipped due to communication send limits, I need to create 12 emails now. 6 non-operational for the main audience, and 6 operational for our intern

When I open the text editor and see the input text pop-up, it would be nice to have a drop-down or sample code field that held the most common used codes. Something where I can select a name and it auto-insets the sample code to be edited. For example: Collections: displayname=column name listdelimiter=<p> listmethod=nested(collectionname).lists textmode=true type=iterate valueexpression=criteria valueformat=HTML Shared Columns: value=<br> valueformat=HTML width=1 sharecol=true General Text Mode: displayname= valueformat= valueexpression=

Make a new Component type for saving and reusing drop-down filters across panels and Analysis Workspace projects.

It would be nice to have daily late proof reminders. I know a late proof reminder goes out one minute after the proof is due however that is the only reminder. It would be great if the system sent out a late proof reminder daily to those who have not reviewed the proof yet. Or at least have an option to have this as a possibility. We are doing this manually everyday and it takes time that could be automated.

Ability to link proof decisions to project tasks using unlimited If This/Then That statements. We had this logic in another proj management system and we miss it sooooo much. Example:If "proof" decision is approved, then "task" is complete. (Proof approval completes design phase and auto moves project forward to next task)If "proof" decision is approved with changes or rejected, then activate "task". (Proof edits activate design revision step.)

Allow for searching within an object's Journal Entries for Timestamp verification of Specific changes. This will satisfy some SOX audit requirements.

Our users would like a way to select multiple Proofs in the dashboard and make a decision on them.Currently in Proof users can make a decision on a proof from the Proof viewer or the Proof Details view from the dashboard, but this is limited to one proof at a time. There are tasks or actions that are supported after selecting multiple proofs. In the more menu there are task such as Lock, Activate, Archive an so on that do work on a batch of proofs. Please ass make a decision.

We have implemented a solution that is highly dependent on the ability to resource by both User Group and Project group. In doing so, specific Resource Managers can filter the Scheduler tool to see only those unassigned tasks specific to their designed business area. This roll-out was a major win for Workfront with the client who has previously struggled with tool adoption.The depreciation of the Scheduler tool in exchange for the Workload balancer will significantly impact adoption and usability of the tool. Additionally, there is a general distrust of the tool across the organization since it hasn’t been optimized and successfully rolled out to date. A forced redesign due to the lack of functionality in the Workload Balancer will surely hinder the client's trust in the tool and future product development.The inability to filter unassigned tasks by Project Group, and to view available resource by User Group will require a redesign specifically to fit into the functionality of the

We know it is possible to assign UTM using “Program Tokens”: edit the HTML code within the emails to add tokens (program or database field) coded as UTM parameters and the end of the links. You set program tokens for each of the global UTM parameters for everyone, then use the Marketo personalization tokens for anything else you're passing along. You have to build the string for the clickthru links in the HTML code.   HOWEVER, what we would need is, in the admin>Tag>category section, to be able to set UTM codes for each category, and make sure that, by default, all links added to an e-mail of category XYZ is suffixed with the right UTM code.

We would like tokens to be used in Smart List Filters.

It is perfectly possible to activate a program and launch an email without activating the flows. There are a lot of steps and clicks required before sending an email and if you don't pay attention you can send an email despite flows being inactive. Every program consists in several flow steps, to update the status of the program members (bounced, opened, clicked, unsubscribed, etc). Each status change is handled by a flow and these flows need to be activated one by one before approving a program for launch. If we forget to do this, we will not know whether an email was opened or clicked and these statuses are used by scoring programs (if email is clicked, then a score will be assigned to the person). So the idea is to have a warning on the program Control Panel to inform the user that a flow is inactive and must be activated.