Product Communities

Some of our users mainly use Workfront to manage approvals, but there is no where to log the time directly on the approval. It would be great if when a user completes an approval, the approval appears as a row in their timesheet - like it would if the user had 'worked on' or 'completed' a task. In addition - it would be great if there could be a log time button when someone is completing an approval.

We need to be able to utilize Programs for our Campaign assignments, but due to the volume of our work-- more than 10,000 project per year-- the Programs need to be deactivated, just like Portfolios, Projects, or Issues can be. This is essential. Other work-arounds are clumsy and unreliable.

As of January 2021 continuous audience sync is available, but it's only available for static lists. Would love to see this introduced to smart lists as well. 

Currently, the "Export as PNG" feature in the Metrics area of a Project is not delivering expected results, because it only captures what's on the screen instead of the whole picture. With current functionality, the image is missing information that may be relevant to stakeholders to whom the image is shared. The current functionality renders the feature basically useless. It has the potential of being useful if only it captured the entirety of the project's metrics.

As of today, using /rest/v1/program/members/describe.json will return default Program Member fields in addition to whatever custom fields have been defined. Although items like Acquired By and Success are present, the field for Success Date is not. Could this be added to the list of extractable fields, both when describing and exporting?

In "My Work", items come in flagged with the priority. I will see red lines for urgent objects.This is super helpful to quickly identify rush tasks and requests. Having this in Home would be wonderful!

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: To have the Environment ie. Prod/Staging/Dev explicitly listed in the URL for AEMaaCS Use-case: Easier for end users to understand what environment their respective URL for the Author and Publish tier they are looking at. Current/Experienced Behavior: The current access URL is for the author is:https://author-pNumber-eNumber.adobeaemcloud.com Improved/Expected Behavior: The access URL for the author tier should be:https://PROD/STAGING/DEVauthor-pNumber-eNumber.adobeaemcloud.com It's far easier to understand which environment the URL relates too when viewed in a browser as people won't remember the p or e numbers. the same applies to the publish tier. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name:   Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Hello, I have a situation where I set a task to 100% complete. This normally removes it from assigned users' timesheets. However, if a user pinned the task on their timesheet, it remains on their timesheet and they can still log hours on the task even when it is set to complete. As the owner of a project, I am responsible for tracking and keeping hours on budget. When I "close” a task as complete I would expect it to no longer allow users to log hours to it. This is not he case when users pin a task on their timesheet and log hours to the task after set to complete and is causing issues with monitoring and controlling budgeted hours.

Currently, you have 4 options to reference a program in the 'Member of Program' filter.  Program:isis notis anyis emptyI would like to see 'contains' & 'not contains' added to these 4 options.  We strictly enforce naming conventions, and the ability to filter by 'contains' would allow us to automatically keep smart lists, segments, etc... up to date by using "Program contains Sales Nurture", instead of having to say 'is' and select each program.

In our scenario, we have multiple job roles assigned to one task on a project. When a user wants to log time to the specific task on the project we have run into difficulty because the project will not show up for them in the "timesheet add task search" when when searching by their job role.The project is shared with them by their job role with contribute access allowing them to add time to the project.The task is shared with them by their job role with contribute access which SHOULD allow them to add Task time to the task regardless of if their job role is the primary assignee or one of the "others" assigned to the task.Current Workfront limitations are keeping the the "other" assignees from adding tasks to their timesheet by their job role association.*Note: We are aware that we could add this person's time to the Project level however we specifically want to use Task Time in order to to work with an integration with another internal corporate billin

We have a need for a Company-wide release calendar that pulls all active and open projects across all portfolios and business units into one calendar view. Currently when you look at the calendar month view you can turn each sub-calendar on/off but when you look at the gantt view it would be nice to have the projects grouped by the portfolio so that all projects for that portfolio are grouped together. It would also be awesome if we could sort the portfolios from A-Z to make it easier to view the data.

The Slack integration currently allows you to submit requests/issues into a project or "queue" but the integration is really basic. It currently has no support for custom forms- so if you use slack to submit a request into workfront, that request is essentially blank.Would be great if this worked similarly to the Outlook integration, where it is able to support the custom form fields that exist on projects/queues. The current integration is just about useless for request submission without the custom field capability as it requires a user to go ask whomever submitted for more information.

It seems that most of the Bizible Product Documentation has been moved to the "Adobe Experience League" instead of the previous docs.marketo.com location. There should be a link to the product documentation directly inside Bizible.

-Current situation: Approvals/Comments on a Proof are not shown in the notifications blue square in Workfront, only via email form.-Enhancement: When Approvals or Comments are done to a Proof, show them shown in the notifications blue square in Workfront.

-Current Situation: When I create a new proof and select an Automatic proofing workflow, the Proofing Workflows show the list of people based on the order they were entered when creating the workflow.-Enhancement: When I create a new proof and select an Automatic proofing workflow, the Proofing Workflows shows first the people listed in the following order:1) Reviewer & Approvers2) Approver3) Reviewer4) Read Only

-Current Situation: In a proof, when adding a new version, you see all the approvers added to the last version but don't see what was their decision in the previous version (Approved, Approved with Changes, Changes Required, Not Relevant).-Enhancement: In a proof, when adding a new version, you see all the approvers added to the last version AND their decision in the previous version (Approved, Approved with Changes, Changes Required, Not Relevant).

Hello @1905403,the functionality to use a dropdown list for properties and environments to replace the embedded Launch code is very helpful. Unfortunately the list is limited to 100 entries - and we have more than that. We support hundreds of websites, and for many of them the request was to track data without implementation effort. Therefore we implement in an own Launch property page and button detections per website (more or less). We are on the way to migrate (as in the meantime management was convinced of the benefits of more detailed web tracking) but we have to deal with more than 100 properties for a long time. Therefore it would be great for us to increase the limit for the dropdown list to e.g.256.Because now the benefit of this functionality is very limited for us. And on the other hand important because it would reduce effort and time for us.

It would be useful to be able to extend LP redirect rules for any assets in the file system.  We have had a few incidents where marketers have shared links to PDF assets directly by mistake, and these have ended up being indexed by search engines. We would love to redirect these to a more appropriate location on our main website. 

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enable users to sort pages and experience fragments based on name Use-case:   Current/Experienced Behavior: Pages/Experience Fragments are always sorted based on creation date.  Improved/Expected Behavior: Users should be able to choose to sort pages/experience fragments in column view based on the name of the item. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable):   Customer-name/Organization name: Amazon.com Employee Services Screenshot (if applicable): This is the feature available for assets in AEM 6.5.7   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Content Reference fields in a Content Fragment should update when references are moved Use-case: When Content Reference fields are used in a Content Fragment model, and populated in the Content Fragment to point to an asset or content, when this asset or content is moved, these Content Reference fields should update like any reference fields. Current/Experienced Behavior: When a content reference field is populated to point to an asset, and if the asset is moved, the content reference field is not updated. The Authors need to manually update these content reference fields to point to the new location of the asset. Improved/Expected Behavior: The content reference field should update when an asset is moved. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.7 Customer-name/Organization name: ANZ Screenshot (if applicable): Behaviour is available OOTB. Just add a Content Reference field

With the 21.1 release the all requests/submitted requests view was changed and now I can no longer see the "assigned to" column when viewing all requests in the request queue. We have multiple people trafficking the request queue so it's helpful if we can see who has picked up a request and assigned it out to our users and our teams. With the way the interface is now displaying requests, the only way to see who is assigned to a request, is to open the request. This is time consuming. We can't see the assignments at a glance. It would be very helpful to have the "assigned to" column added to this view so that we can see the assignments without having to open an individual request.

Between our creative, editorial, and account manager functions there are a lot of edits that are made on materials. We would like to stack the materials on top of each other as the edits are received and made by responsible parties. Once edits are made we name them with the corresponding version i.e. version 1, 2, 3. But when you stack documents on each other they will only show the version 1 instead of the unique name that was given to the material. This makes it difficult to identify the most recent version. Ultimately we would like the name that is given to the new edited document to show up instead of it always showing as version 1

Currently, in order to temporarily enable the Undo button, you must switch the Plan Mode from Autosave to Manual Save. That then only tracks changes for the current working session and you also introduce the risk of not saving desired changes. Microsoft and Google Products provide autosave in combination with a version history that tracks all changes and stores them as a version history, so that you can always undo changes, even days after you've made them. Workfront already has autosave and an Update history audit trail, so it would be helpful if that Update history could be put to use to enable an Undo button even when Auto-save is on.

The Gantt Chart currently has checkboxes that allow you to display %complete right within the Gantt bar itself (as well as Project Status, and some other settings).What is noticeably missing from that drop-down list is the ability to show the name of the Project or Task that is to the left of that Gantt chart bar and know which project or task the bar represents.With that adjustment, Planners would have the option of reviewing the Gantt Chart without needing the split-screen Name Column to the side of the Gantt Chart that you always have to re-justify from the center of the screen.

Hello, When creating a content fragment model, the data types "multi line text", “number field” and "enumeration" are missing the following properties:Mandatory flag for “multi line text” and “enumeration”Max. length for “multi line text” and “number field” We are using the latest 6.5 FP. Is it that feature on a roadmap ? Can we expect it in future releases ? Or should we request an evolution to add these fields ?Below is a snapshot showing the properties of the multi line text, we see that these 2 options are missing: Note: using the table kept deleting the content of my request so not using it...