Product Communities

Hi all... I would like to propose two potential improvements to the use of filters in Workspace. 1. Allow filters to be used/set at a report level.- At present if you have multiple panels which you want to have all the same filters on you need to add them each manually.  It is a pain.  It would be easier if you could set the filters you want on a report (or on one panel and select apply to all panels - the same way dates currently work potentially). 2. Allow you to control width of filter diplay text/content- At present you cant adjust the width of text that displays for a filter.  As such you either need very short filter names or need to hover over each filter just to see what the actual filter is you would be selecting.  It would be great if you could adjust the display width of a filter (the same way you can with the column widths).

Rather than getting a notification that a predecessor task is complete and showing the dependent tasks, it would be great to get a notification that clearly tells a person that their task is ready for them. Maybe it's just changing the notification text in the body of the email from "Here are the dependent tasks:" to something like "Your task is ready to begin:" ? That might be enough to clear it up.

Would love to be able to choose what the user views on the top heading of a project. Currently it is Percent Complete, Job Owner, Planned Completion, Condition and Status. For our purposes, users would prefer to see the Reference # and have Condition removed. Add attachments isn't working. Will try to add screenshot after posting.

We would like the ability to see who and when changes are made to system wide settings within our instance.

Description: Undo latest changes to a defined "snapshot"I would love to have a new feature which allows me to go back in "property history" to a defined point. maybe it is like working with a git branch: at any point I can create a git branch, try some changes. if it doesn't work as expected, I can delete the branch and revert everything to the master (last snapshot)Why is this feature important to youEspecially when new requirements arrive, there are multiple solutions on how to implement it within Adobe Launch. Or it is just a test if an idea would work as expected. But if something failes or it doesn't work as expected, the "redo" can be a huge effort since we need to edit each single item (extensions, rules, data elements) and set it to the last published state.How would you like the feature to workThe new feature would consist of two action:"Create a property snapshot" which makes a backup of everything within a property"Revert to snapshot" which would delete everything and load l

Similar to the Used By tab, I propose adding another tab for Forms that list all the fields that are currently being used in a specific form.    It's very frustrating to have to open a form in order to see what fields are included, which then creates a draft of both the form and the landing page. Looking at the preview isn't helpful because we use hidden fields and change the labels on many of the fields.  This extra tab would save time and be a better user experience.     

If a resource has a 20-hour task that must completed in two weeks, the Resource Planner splits the hours across the days of the two weeks. But what if the person can get more work done and completes 90% of his work in the first week? At this time the Resource planner continues to show 10 hours of pending work for the following week when it should only be 2 hours (10% of 20 hours). Showing 10 hours instead of 2, distorts the actual workload that a resource has for the next week and can show work that has already been done as pending.

Other Workgroups' users who need to have access to the Custom Form field data in our Projects use the System Wide Search on their teams, which allows them to use a bit of a back door to access the Tasks and Documents on our Projects - which is problematic. We are having meetings with those users to define a different procedure for that, but as additional teams/users get into the system it is going to be hard to manage.It would be great if Admins could customize the accessibility of the System Wide search if needed. Some limiting options like what they are allowed to access and how deep they can go, whether as global settings or per Workgroup.

Hello Workfront Users! We would love to limit the amount of characters in a custom field in Workfront. We have certain fields that link to other systems, where in the other systems there is a requirement to not exceed a certain amount of characters. We cannot think of a good work around at this time! Thanks for your votes!

I noticed if you change a task status to Cancelled or On Hold, the Planned hours still remain in the Resource Planner, (as do the Projected Costs) which I feel is an unexpected and undesired behaviour. If you simply delete the task then all reference to it is lost which I don't think is always ideal.The problem with Cancelled or On Hold tasks Planned hours remaining in the Resource Planner is it gives a false reading of the work remaining for a team or person.You can't seem to add a Task level filter either to the Resource Planner to exclude Cancelled or On Hold tasks from calculations which is a bit annoying. I feel you should be able to Cancel or put a task On Hold, and leave the tasks planned hours and assignments so you have reference of what was originally planned for the task (helpful for reporting and in case they are required again later), but have the ability to remove this information from resource planning and cost calculations later on, at minimum be able to filter

We want to report on the hours of assigned and unassigned tasks by job role for a defined period of time (week, month, quarter, etc.). Right now, we can see total hours assigned by job role OR total hours assigned to team members, but there's no consolidated view of the two views.

There should be a notification setting that sends an email to a requester when their request has been converted to an issue or project.

It would be very helpful if administrators could move updates/threads from one project to another. I've had a few clients, one especially, who adds updates to the wrong project (they're just not paying attention. I would love to be able to take that update it and move it (thread and all) to the appropriate project. Right now I have to copy and paste the entire thread and create a new update in the correct project which seems very inefficient. Also, I don't remove the original thread in case someone is referencing it which means it lives in the wrong project.Thank you!

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Order of menu bar options should be unique in all scenarios , please find example below. "When you select from a folder, they are ordered CREATE - SHARE LINK - DOWNLOAD - CHECKOUT - PROPERTIES - TO COLLECTION - etc. In a  search selection, they are ordered PROPERTIES - SHARE LINK - TO COLLECTION - DOWNLOAD - CHECKOUT - etc." Having to constantly search for options that are in a different location makes for inefficient navigation.  Use-case: Visibility of menu bar option in fix order in all scenarios / views. Current/Experienced Behavior: Options are not in order if we consider scenario of select searched assets vs navigate to folder and select asset, if you compare menu bar option order , it's not the same. Improved/Expected Behavior: Options should be in one unique order.  Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 6.5.7 Customer-name/Organization name: Hershey's Scr

Allow replacing of Workfront logos with client company logos fin the notification emails

I don't know if anyone else is experiencing this, but every time I go to any help article, I have to change it from the default "Classic" to "New Experience" to see the newest info. Is it possible for those to default to the New Experience as Classic is being phased out so we don't have to choose it every time? Or have it know which you are using and default to that.It's the little things :)

To avoid activating a program too quickly and send to the wrong audience (eg, I update the smartlist but then quickly go to the control panel and activate the program before checking that the size of the audience seems correct), the activate button should be disabled until the calculation of the audience is completed.  This safeguard goes in line with the other suggestion made here: https://nation.marketo.com/t5/ideas/pop-up-alert-with-confirm-button-on-email-send-out/idi-p/312189 

We NEED the ability to drag and drop events or dimension values into a visualization, and have workspace generate a visitor retention graph based on those different dimension values, with the visitor's first instance of that dimension counting as day 0 or the "inclusion metric".This would be especially helpful for evaluating tests, where visitor's are served different experiences, and we want to see which experience results in more visitors returning to the site in the n-th day/week/month.I know that workspace currently allows us to use dimensions in cohort tables, but this fails for the purposes of evaluating tests or feature based retention. If the visitor came to the site in the 1st week, but wasn't exposed to the test or feature until the 4th week, the cohort table will still include the visitor in the "included" group as if they had seen the test in the 1st week. Sometimes this results in the cohort table displaying higher than 100% retention values for a test or feature.We can ge

There should be a flow action to merge leads.   I realize there are complexities involved with potential field value discrepancies between the winning and losing lead(s) but if people have the confidence that the leads should be merged then this should be an option.   It would be nice if Marketo could build a graphic interface to automate merging, where rules can be set for conflicting field values, as opposed to having to pay for 3rd Party services.   Duplicates are such a big issue for a lot of people using Marketo and besides using a 3rd party or using Zapier or Python to do the merging people do not have a lot of options for automating merging or merging in bulk.

In the New Experience the "Share" link on the document details page is hidden under the ellipsis icon (...). It would be helpful if it could be moved to the lefthand navigation area along with approvals, all versions, updates, custom forms.

Our company relies on the the ability to triage tasks by Working On, Work Requests and Approval tabs and Updates area that appear on the legacy My Work screen. We cannot move to the new Workfront Experience and gain benefits from other features until we have this view available. We've attempted to create this in a dashboard view, but reporting limitations does not appear in the same way where you have sorting by Overdue, Due Today, Due Tomorrow, Due this Week, and beyond.

Description -As every company has his own preferences of storing and naming documents, it causes expenditure to rename a document every time over and over again. So my idea was to replace this process by a function of Adobe PDF. I thought about a function that enable to capture key information about a document while creating it. So that this information is converting to the file name automatically. For example the date of creating, the valuta date, the subject, document type and so on. Since some companys could still have individual preferences of the order and type of information, it could be an additional function that allow the user to adjust the information and order he likes to have in the documents names.Why is this feature important to you -I am working in the administration of an asset manager and have to work with many documents daily. Every time a new document arrives us, I have to rename and save it in a uniform structure.How would you like the feature to work -Current Behav

I really would like to have the details of what is open in a particular tab listed. When working in the updated interface I've noticed all tabs are titled "Marketo Engage". Makes for a lot of clicking around in tabs if you like working with multiple open.   Here is open tabs on the old UX for comparison. It gives details on what section of Marketo you are in and what program/asset.  

Hi all,   since the new version of marketo came (Marketo Engage) there is no difference between a normal campaign and a campaign that is requested. Can you please add a separate icon for requested campaigns just like the arrow pointing to the light bulb was before?   Thanks!

Recently, while I was implementing features in my local, it had took me more than 30 minutes to upload a file with 3 records, also I found the marketo failures api doesn't work correctly, first it can't report meaningful message , I didn't find any information in the wiki(https://developers.marketo.com/rest-api/error-codes/), the second bad thing is, from the response csv file, it can't provide the error code column,we can never know the status code X@X-OptiPlex-7020:~$ curl 'https://091-CTR-291.mktorest.com/bulk/v1/leads/batch/566157/failures.json?access_token=#credential#' advertiserId,atsJobId,campaignName,jobTitle,Import Failure Reason 230933980,2,test campaign2,test job title2,Unknown error 230933980,1,test campaign1,test job title1,Unknown error 230933980,1,test campaign3,test job title won't override 1,Unknown errorAfter I chatted with custom service, case number(01418355), confirmed the bulk api & json rest api response is not identical on response format in importing lead