Product Communities

Whenever the mouse pointer enters the Fallout area, the whole visualization changes so we can see the dimensions and metrics of the Fallout.It would be great if we had the option to lock the Fallout, this way it would not change until we unlock it again.

We need additional status columns to manage the development of product releases.After some painful testing of Workfront Agile Teams, we recognise the product needs some serious enhancement to bring it on a par with free competitor products on the market.Status ManagementAgile Teams only pull statuses from the System "Status" panel in the Setup area. This means small development teams cannot customise their processes without adding extra status noise for all system users. Not suitable for big instances with thousands of users.Status ColumnsSecondly, an Agile Team should have up to 10 status columns available; however, there is a bug that limits you to 5 columns (release 21.3). We cannot even pull all the status columns we need into the storyboard. I would make the number unlimited to enable custom processes rather than set a limit.I'm not asking for approval or task ownership permissions in this enhancement request as I don't see Workfront getting there anytime soon bu

It would be AWESOME if you could have a radio button option that was prepopulated with Yes and No and still have the ability to change the name or add new choices. I just had to create 50 Y/N questions and it sucked

The create task function to owner should operate similarly to the send alert function where you are able to assign it to a token (ex: {{lead.CSM Owner}}).

Description - when changing the date range in a workspace panel I'd like the capability to have comparison dates that are dynamic in line with the new date selection. Why is this feature important to you - the feature is important because it gives users of the Workspace the flexibility to adjust dates as needed and have comparison dates adjust in line.How would you like the feature to work - have the ability to create date ranges that use the panel date as a reference point.Current Behavior -  I have a report set at 'last month' and KPIs measuring versus the same month in the previous year.  The previous year date is rolling monthly so it remains aligned as long as the panel date is 'last month'.  If I change the panel date to yesterday the 'last year' date remains at 'last month previous year' so doesn't accurately reflect YoY change.

The Gantt chart view doesn't really have any line contrast to it which makes it very hard to scale over from the task details side to the Gantt side without losing which line you're on. Of course, you can highlight the specific line, but that's not really practical to do for hundreds of lines. So management asked if there was a way we could request some sort of higher contrast modification

I have filed a bug for this issue, and the response from Marketo Support was to post this as an issue here.   Background: Both Salesforce and Marketo allow carriage return/line feed (CRLF characters) in text fields. In SFDC, for example, users can type sentences, hit the Return key, and thus format entries into paragraphs. When this field syncs to Marketo, Marketo also displays the text with line breaks in its UI for the person record. When you import text with CRLF characters into Marketo, the CRLFs are also preserved. @sanfordwhiteman also has a famous workaround for inserting CRLF characters in tokens.   Issue: When the same field is inserted into a Marketo HTML email using a field token, Marketo strips out the CRLF characters when it inserts the contents of the field. Thus, a field that was a series of paragraphs in SFDC and Marketo turns into a single paragraph in an HTML email, often making it unreadable.   Why This is a Problem: If the CRLF character was

Description -  The ability to update a user's email address without the need of an API or recreating users.Why is this feature important to you -  Our company just changed the email address of all users.  This would not impact the normal users, but this does impact supported users as we now lost the ability to write to client care.  Instead, we had to ask them to create a "mock user" with our new email address while leaving the old one so we can access chat.  This seems backwards to how it should work, especially as the old Adobe Analytics has the ability to update email addresses.How would you like the feature to work -  There is an API for User Management, but this should be a simple request.  Allow the users user id still be their email address, but have the actual email be editable as companies update their email address.  I could recreate all the supported users, but many of ours are set up for integrations which client care and I are u

Description -We would like to be able to make an evar expire on multiple criteria (Page view OR event OR visit). Why is this feature important to you -Working in travel we have multiple evars that we use for different dimensions that are not the same a product. For example, Location, Check-in and Check-out dates. We use eVars to track these but if a visitor moves out of the funnel they persist. The same is true for our online check-in (against the evar we use for a booking number).How would you like the feature to work -In the success events configuration, you should be able to build a "custom" for the expiry which works like the segment builder but in a simplified way.Current Behaviour -An eVar can expire on any ONE of the following four categories:Page view or visit levelTimeConversion EventNever

Description -The Classification Importer feature of Adobe Analytics supports only FTP to upload files, but not SFTP.Why is this feature important to you -Apart from security reasons (considering the FTP protocol as an old and unsecure protocol), Datorama, which we are integrated with, has notified they will end support of FTP protocol by the end of 2021, so, this means our integration Datorama-Adobe Analytics will break by that time.How would you like the feature to work -Allow uploading files via SFTP. Current Behaviour -Only possible via FTP.

Hi All,   I think we should need similar report and filter to Landing page performance report similar to Web Page Activity report. Filters like Activity source so we can tack anonymous user information  which currently  not in Landing page performance report.

When mapping out our campaigns and bandwidth for the upcoming quarter, we'd like to be able to view the tasks of the projects within a portfolio in a calendar.

We need the ability to attach a custom form to a billing record. Use case: some of our projects have multiple billing records. On a single project, one billing record might be billed to department #12345. The 2nd billing record will be billed to department #67890. When sending the exported excel file to finance, we need the department number to be accurate. Currently we have to pull in that field from the project level, which can only have one value and we have to manually change it to the correct one after exporting.

With current setup you are able to check the box and export but the only thing exporting is the custom form title. It would be quite beneficial to be able to export custom forms that shows all fields within that form. Currently, I need to do a screen shot.

We do productivity tracking reports using the timesheet data in Workfront. One thing that would be a big help is the ability to filter the timesheet data by the hour source so I can track these by tasks or see how much time was spent on an activity. The only way to filter this data is to export to Excel and then filter externally.

When users create a request child to a task they are working on, I want them to be able to designate that request as either blocking the parent task (from any further progress) or not blocking the parent task (requests can be worked simutaneous with the task).This way, a user can properly report and see in the "to-do" list of available work tasks that are completely available to work as opposed to those that are otherwise available but blocked by an open request. This clarifies accountability when a user has many tasks to sort through (separating the ones they need to do vs the ones they can't) and helps as a manager to see who is really responsible for a task that is held up on a project.

When a document is not according to Proofs current capability, the generation of the Proof fails.Increase functionality by allowing for:Fonts and images linked from outside sources by allowing their import on a global level (similar to InDesign)Allowing for empty layers and overlapping fields

When users upload documents with different information (e.g. overprinting enabled or not enabled), Proof is currently displaying colors faulty depending on which setting of overprinting is selected in the system. Overprinting can either be activated or deactivated in Proof on a global level. Displaying colors correctly in Proof is for brand guidelines. Allow for both functionalities to run simultaneously in order to not have color display compromised.

Have access to a dashboard that breaks down the daily web services error notification by error and by integration user.   Potentially even adding more detail like the exact time the errors took place or an optional log file that can be downloaded could be added. Currently the only way to get this information is opening a ticket with support and requesting the detailed information day by day.

Improve proof support of PSB (Big PSD) file type generated by photoshop. In our case especially used for infographics, but could be any time of large PSD, typically above 2GB.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Bring back the creative rating field with "stars" in AEM Cloud Use-case: Right now, the creative rating field is a textbox that accepts numeric values. This was not the UI in AEM 6.5 It's hard for our users to rate assets because of this since they don't know the limit Current/Experienced Behavior: The creative rating field is a textbox that accepts numeric values. Improved/Expected Behavior: Bring back the "star" field for creative rating Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Cloud Customer-name/Organization name:   Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

We are trying to change the owner of the proof but for few users, the option to change the owner is available and for a few, it is not. Although they all belong to the same account.Also, when two users have the same access levels & roles, the functionality to change proof owner is working and for some, it is not.

For instances synced with Salesforce:   Currently the "Was Added to Opportunity" filter can be filtered by using the contraints: Is Primary Role (i.e. the Contact Role) These 2 constraints are currently missing from the "Has Opportunity" filter.   It would be beneficial if the "Has Opportunity" filter could be filtered by the "Is Primary" and "Role" fields given that the "Was Added to Opportunity" data is only retained for 25 months whilst the "Has opportunity" field is retained for longer (I don't think there's any limit?).   Note that a possible workaround to the "Was Added to Opportunity" being retained for only 25 months could be to recreate the "Was Added to Opportunity" activity by setting up an automated process in SFDC to remove contacts from the opportunity in SFDC and then re-add them 25 months after they were added as a contact role. Annoying having to do this though.

Hi team,  Would like to suggest updating the Industry picklist in the Firmographic category to include a more comprehensive list of Industries. Missing in particular the "Insurance" picklist value. Thank you,  Emilia

When going into projects it would be great to see the view as I left it. For example for big projects, I may have clicked the arrow to hide the 'planning' phase under parent task. Or I clicked all the rounds of amends to shorten my view so I could see the phase I'm at today. Every time I go back to the project I have to roll them up again!