Product Communities

In the New Workfront experience, there are double scroll which is cumbersome. There is one scroll for dashboard and then one for the window. It prevents seeing all of the projects in one view and have to scroll. Any way this can be fixed? In the classic, if you wanted to see all, you just needed to use the window scroll for the entire list. Attached screenshot for example.

The Fusion log history is lacking as an "enterprise" grade application. The information on who made a change to a flow and when it was made is available. However, there is no information on what change was made. Not having this information makes the log pretty useless.

We ran into the problem, that somehow the notification settings of our audit user have been changed. Only two people have access to that account and both denied doing the changes themselves. So it would have been great to see by whom those changes were made.

When editing layout templates there is an option to edit "Lists" (which controls filters, views & groupings) on various objects. However, you cannot pare down the list of filters, views & groupings that users see on individual projects or issues. Our users would like simpler functionality, and to not see all this clutter in these lists (the vast majority of our users work on single issues or projects). We would like the option to limit the number of choices they have in these dropdowns, but as the below screenshot shows, they are not available.

When you create a user from another user it automatically defaults the access level to the access of the user you are copying.However, when you create a user from another user that has be deactivated, the access level is set to the max access level you are permitted to assign. The field should be left blank or there should be a preference for the default access level that should be applied, similar to the default access level on SSO auto-provisioning.

Id like to be able to cross reference more than one field when you send an alert or create a task.    Ex: If x and y = true -> then send alert. instead of if y = true or y = true -> send alert

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Add (optional) approval step (or something similar) before deploying to a Dev or Stage environment Use-case: The environments are used by a different company to test the software and therefore requires alignment of the deployment maintenance. As the build time could vary a lot, this maintenance window needs to be quite large. (With this option the 15 minutes of the deployment step + 10 minutes smoke test as maintenance window would already be sufficient as the pipeline and its long running build and unit testing steps could be started much earlier.) Current/Experienced Behavior: After "Code Scanning" step the pipeline will immediately start deploying the new software package. Improved/Expected Behavior: Option to pause the pipeline before executing the deployment step. This option should be available for non-production as well as production pipelines. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicab

To have the ability to rename pinned pages. See attachment for example.

Dear Marketo Engineer,I would like to submit an idea regarding syncing a multi-select field between Dynamics to Marketo. (screenshot attached) We have this multi-select field (called: Attributes) in our Dynamics. It is a drop-down list, and you can select multiple field values at the same time. This multi-select field cannot currently sync to our Marketo instance because this feature is not now available in Marketo.It will be great to have this sync feature between Dynamics and Marketo as this multi-select field gives us valuable information. Thank you so much!Wayne

Description - Be able to “Favorite” a Workspace that has been opened only via a shared link and not shared directly with the user. The Workspace should then show in the Workspace Favorites list and not have to be accessed only via link.Why is this feature important to you - In my org admins are the only users who can share Workspace projects to user groups or product profiles. Most users end up sharing a link to their Workspace with others, instead of the 'Share project' functionality. Users would like to be able to Favorite or "bookmark" these Workspaces they access via a short link without saving as a new Workspace. This would remove the issue where links expire, or users trying to find a link.How would you like the feature to work -  A user opens a Workspace via a shared short link. The user clicks on the Favorites star next to the title of the Workspace. The user then clicks on the main Workspaces tab and can see the Workspace now appear under "My Favorite Projects"

In Proof HQ you could easily view other proofs in the folder, now in Workfront I am unable to do that, we upgraded (but seems like a downgrade :() Can we please get this feature back into Workfront. To compare proofs I was able to easily select compare in ProofHQ and toggle to a different proof in a folder. Now there are many more clicks involved using Workfront. Also to compare different proofs, I have to close out of the current comparison and select two new ones then launch it again. Was seamless before, now it feels like many steps backwards.Please get this into Workfront as our clients are wondering why this feature would be taken off.Thank you,Junaid

It would be great if Fusion 2 module error handling included exponential backoff, so that 429, 500, and 502 errors don't just throw an error and stop the scenario.

The current document decision options in Workfront are: ApproveApproved with ChangesReject For liability reasons, legal reviewers in the system do not want to tag documents as "Approved." We would like to have the ability to change the names of the available decisions, as they can be edited in Proof.

When filling out a custom form via a request queue and converting the issue/request to a project (where there is no project template) we would like the custom form to attach automatically without a team member having to manually attach the custom form to the project for the information to flow over.

Current UI of embedded custom forms in Workfront is disapointing. It could really use a refresh.Main problems:A lot of useless white spaceeverything left alignedlimited organization of fields (custom fields cannot be mixed with default fields)lack of brandinglack of visual elemntsoutdated UINice interface is like entry door to a store, you want this to look nice and attract customers. With workfront request form design this is hard to achieve.Few random example from internet to show how modern webform should look like

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: As a user, I prefer to see a “relate” function at the top ribbon for ease of use. Use-case: When working with assets, have the ability to access the "relate" function from the top ribbon Current/Experienced Behavior: The "relate" function can only be accessed from the ellipse on the properties screen when working with an asset Improved/Expected Behavior: The "relate" function will be moved to a more prominent place on the top ribbon  Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Adobe Experience Manager 2021.7.5607.20210705T063041Z-210600 Customer-name/Organization name: Accenture Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

When we route websites, the image is a screengrab. When we want to use the Text tool to highlight text to make comments more streamline, we don't have the ability since text is not detectable.

It would be great if you can provide the functionality to extract the list of the leads (that are marked as a bot). This will help us to analyze those leads and then exclude them from our next email sends which will help in improving email deliverability, opens and clicks.  

Description - Enable Remote Offers to be used in Auto Personalisation activitiesWhy is this feature important to you - More than 90% of our offers are Remote Offers, managed in the CMS. For various reasons we aren't using experience fragments - and yes, we are hoping to move to experience fragments and complete the integration, but unless you a) Use AEM, b) use Experience Fragments, and c) have the integration to publish into AEC - you can't make use of AP for web unless you hard-code HTML into the Target UI, which seems very limiting from a feature adoption perspective. In our case, manually authoring HTML in the Target UI introduces the risk of human error, inconsistent content, and is a very manually tedious task that makes it hard for us to transition our existing activities into AP. It also causes us issues because our 'offers' are managed by content managers in the CMS, and with the AP limitation we have to introduce more handoffs and additional steps, checks and balances in the

Need to have the ability to do multi-filter grouping in the resource planner same as report types. This will enable us to analyze set of projects/resources at once that falls to either of the multi-filter groups.

Imagine I have a task called inspect widget. This task will take place over the course of a few days and will all be performed by the same person. This task involves checking the size, color, and electrical performance of the widget. Today I could create a task grouping and make three separate tasks, but that is both ugly and confusing. It would also grow the size of the project which affects display performance. What I envision is a checklist like capability where you could optionally tie each item in the checklist to a % completion of the total task. For example, size might be 25% of the task, color 10% and electric 65%. Checking each item off would drive completion of the task. This functionality would allow for greatly simplified project plans that still have good details as to what steps are needed to complete a task. Bonus points if we could create a way to drive predecessors off of checklist items as well as the task.

Currently when working in the agile project view you can add fields to each Story (subtask) and assign points to each card. You can add up to three fields to the card but none of the fields show the points assigned for that particular card, just the total points of the iteration (all the cards added up). Suggesting to have the ability to add a field to the card to show what that cards assigned points are. In a waterfall style project view text mode would be enables, so that may also be part of this solution.

I am using a Fusion automation to notify users that save their converted tasks into the queue project, asking them to move these tasks. The project should have a toggle "Allow Tasks" in the queue setup panel. Alternately, a class should be added to the permissions model to allow/disallow users from saving tasks into a project. Thanks.

We would appreciate the ability to set up dynamic routing rules for queue topics. This would be especially useful for queue topics that are used to log issues to live projects. For example, if someone logs a code issue to a project, I would like the new issue to use a dynamic routing rule that always routes to the project owner, or certain users that match a certain job role within the project team. This would allow us to automate the issue logging workflow considerably.

We need to have a functionality to allow "watchers" on requests/issues without being a part of the approval path or being an approver. In our environment, we have a group of executives who would like to be informed of activities. However, in our current workfront environment, in order for them to be notified in an automated fashion, they have to be set as an approver. This is creating bottlenecks in our process flow. Rather than having a request be approved by 2 people, it has to be approved by 5 instead, because the other 3 would like to be informed. This would be an extension of the subscribe functionality. Here's why the subscribe functionality fail in our organization: 1. subscribers have to manually stumble upon an issue/request in order to subscribe to it 2. admins can't pre-subscribe a user to a particular group/category of request