Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
High-volume instances are among those most likely to be using Custom Activities, but those instances are the most likely to need many Custom Activity entries sent back to Marketo. As an integration developer, I would like the ability to bulk import Custom Activity entries to an instance. For example, if I'm running a process outside of the Marketo UI and need to note the 10,000 records that were affected by other software in a company's martech stack with a Custom Activity, there's no way to do that short of using... 10,000 API calls. This is both inefficient and puts high-volume instances at the risk of running over their API call limit. The idea would be much the same as other bulk imports done today, and could use the exact same import format that the Bulk Activity Export data uses today.
Allow the option to have "Backlog" as part of the Status grouping when reporting on Agile tasks for Kanban teams. Currently, only active statuses (those with an iteration ID - New, In Progress, Complete, etc.) display.
Having subscriptions to smart lists is great as we can get the reports directly on our email, what could enhance this is to be able to set a specific time schedule to get the report delivered, as I far as I understood now all the smart list subscription reports run around 3am EST
At the moment it is not possible to take the field values coming in with custom activities and map those to Marketo fields (similar to webhook response mapping) or transfer those to Marketo fields in another way. The primary attribute value can be stored in a field using the {{trigger.name}} token. It would be nice if all custom activity field values could be accessed using trigger tokens.
When making assignments, our users see too many options. Teams they would never want to interact with are still visible.'view only companies, groups, and teams they belong to' would limit this, but it does not provide enough control.Now that teams can have a group attached to them, could we have an setting like 'view only teams which share a group with the user'?
Hello Adobe, I would like to have a more explicit indication of the status of all classifications - especially FTP - into Adobe. The problem is that currently, we have to classify the product sku (and other variables) every day but need to wait 2-3 days before they appear in the interface. If we classify earlier than they appear in the interface, we end up reclassifying the same values again, which drastically slows down the process. In addition, it's not easy to create an automated classification flow when it's relying on a random time window (48-72 hours). Whether browser or FTP import, can we get a status on all classifications into a report suite in a separate or the same tab? Thanks,Ray
Description - In Data Warehouse I created a report for executives but do not see a feature to "sort by" for the metrics. I need to sort largest to smallest for internal searches. Why is this feature important to you - 1. Our executives want an automated emailed report for Internal Search Terms by metric Internal Searches [event]. 2. They want the report to sort by metric Internal searches from highest to lowest. How would you like the feature to work - To be able to sort Internal Searches even from highest to lowest to see the search terms at the top that received the most searches. Current Behaviour - Currently the report comes in automatically sorted by the dimension name [Internal Search Term]. We need it to sort by those terms that received the most searches first down to the lowest.
My proposal is to display enable a field to display the days of float (also known as slack) for any task based on the projected dates. That field could then be added to a column within a view. I have a project with ~500 tasks, everything is linked using proper predecessor relationships, and there are several parallel paths that are very close to the critical path. In fact the critical path changes between 4 different threads depending on what is delayed. I need a way to see how close any given task or thread is getting based on the updates. The software has to calculate the days of float, since by definition, the critical path consists of tasks with 0 float. All I'm requesting is a way to display the information that should already be calculated. The slack date is a cumbersome way to track how close a project thread is to the critical path and it doesn't calculate correctly today. (See another idea to fix the calculation.) This is basic functionality in the most common project
Description - Can we have a log feature for Classification Import?Why is this feature important to you - It will help us have more visibility on the file that are getting posted to via FTPHow would you like the feature to work - A log feature for import file like the one “Data Source” or “Customer Attributes” hasCurrent Behaviour - For now, we can only receive email notifications 3-4 hours later if the import process is successful
On the Documents page, we would like to see the word 'PROJECT FOLDERS' show as a link. Users spend a lot of time in this area look for their documents and never think to click 'project folder' because it does not appear as a link.
You know what would be nice?If you should search by the url to find the landing page associated to that url. More often than not, I have to fill out the form on the landing page then lookin my activity log to find the campaign/landing page I need to find.
I have a suggestion which would like you to improve them to make Data Warehouse used more efficiently: Add "Delete or Cancel" function next to "Error" function in requests in Request Manager.At the moment, there is "Cancel" function in Scheduled requests only. Thank you.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Custom Tag predicates cannot be permanently configured to only pull specific namespaces Use-case: We want to have multiple tag fields not just one Current/Experienced Behavior: AEM has an out-of-the-box tag field. There are certain instances wherein stakeholders would like custom tag fields configured for certain tag groups. E.g. A tag field for “Content Type”, “Target Country(ies), “Campaign”. In the schema editor, there is no out-of-the-box way to limit what namespace is going to be displayed on a certain tag predicate. With that, even if there are multiple tag fields created, all of them will display the same set of tags or tag groups Improved/Expected Behavior: Have the ability to point tags fields to a specific namespace Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMAaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable): &
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: As a general user, I'd like to have a "recently used tags" feature that suggests tags in the textbox so that I don't have to remember what I previously used Use-case: A user is adding an asset and wants to add tags to it. Current/Experienced Behavior: User has to pick tags manually Improved/Expected Behavior: A list of tags that have been recently been added will appear and user will be able to select tags for the asset they are working on. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Adobe Experience Manager 2021.7.5607.20210705T063041Z-210600 Customer-name/Organization name: Accenture Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Hi WF Community,The ability to add custom billing rates per individual, per portfolio, per project.At present, you can only add a billing rate per individual on their user record; however, if that user has a $80/hr bill rate for Portfolio A, and a $95/hr bill rate for Portfolio B, and a $110/hr bill rate for Portfolio C, there's no current way to solve for this. Yes, you can set them up under a job role and control custom bill rates at the company and project levels, but we have way too many people to do this for, and would have to set up hundreds, if not thousands, of job roles to account for the many custom bills rates per individual. This would destroy the intended use of job roles for other needs, and would be a beast to maintain.
We currently call the privacy api deletion endpoint and then poll for status until we see the deletion has been completed. We have noticed during testing that analytics returns "status": "complete" and "message": "success" regardless of whether a customer existed in the system prior to the deletion request, which is a concern for our data governance team. Customer Care have advised that this is the current expected behaviour. Other products such as Target and Audience Manager, make this distinction by responding with status = complete but with the following additional detail:Audience Manager: "message": "Not applicable - Unable to resolve the user ids referenced in the request", "responseMsgCode": "PRVCY-6052-200", "responseMsgDetail": "Unknown user IDs are not applicable for this product."Target: "message": "Not applicable - user context not found" Are there any plans to introduce this depth of information to the analytics product response?
Right now, when an error or warning occurs on a Fusin scenario, everyone in the Fusion Team is notified. It would be extremely useful if we would select the role or team member to receive these notifications while suppressing them to all other roles/users. All team members don't need to see them so setting up the 'notification role' would be very useful. This is especially the case where a partner is hosting/maintaining a client's environment. Thanks.
Hello We have a lot of daily feedings created in Feeding Manager (Data Feeds) in Adobe Analytics. Because of last security audit we have been asked to make frequently changing a credentials for few hundreds of feedings. We have spoken with Adobe Customer Care and what we get informed, this cannot be done via API or any other tool which help us avoid manually changing secret key and access key. Changing manually lot of lot of feedings is a nonsense and a lot of time consuming. This is important so may i ask you for help and make implementation of that feature in Adobe Analytics ?Kind Regards Arek
We have several users who assign document approval tasks to individual approvers, approvers who often aren't familiar with Workfront. When those approvers are notified via email that a document requires their approval the notification link will take them to the task they are assigned, but when the document lives at the project level those approvers get lost trying to navigate WF and sometimes won't even have access to the higher level project itself.We propose finding a solution that allows approvers assigned to a task to have quick/easy access to project level documents (either through the initial notification itself, or via the task they are assigned) without giving them full access to the rest of the project, and without requiring a complicated click path.Current impact report on this Issue over the past year:23 Groups affected~3,000 users affected~16,000 projects affected266 hours annually of impact (approves clicking around lost, or seeking help/additional access as a res
My team would love to be able to sort notifications either by project, proof or anything. Right now, it's just all chronological and they are looking for the ability to, for example, sort by a project or proof and mark all of those notifications seen at one time. The inability to do this can be particularly frustrating in the case of a proof. A user has gone into a proof, reviewed all the comments in the proof and then still has to go into their notifications and mark the notifications for the proof comments as "seen" in the notifications tab.
Currently, when you go to swap an image in a Marketo email and then select "design studio" you are seeing the images alphabetically and then have to search to find your asset. It would be great if the default view could be sorted by "last uploaded" date as well.
Possible this is redundant to other proof ideas, but can't always tell what is for the built-in proof vs. Workfront Proof (formerly Proof HQ); this is for the latter:We need more robust reporting back to Workfront. Things like:Current Stage NameCurrent Stage Start DateCurrent Stage Due DateAny previous stages and their name, start date, and complete/lock datesA true "complete" status (vs. the vaguer idea of a "lock") for the entire review/routing. And make this complete/lock information reportable.The idea is that when a project manager (proof owner) has dozens of routings multiplied by 6-12 reviewers each that they should be able to have a report/dashboard that can report back robust information without diving into each individual project/task/document.
TL:DR - Ability to clone active Smart Campaigns.Currently we are going through the next phase of our Marketo integration. Phase one was set up as one Workspace, but as the business needs grew we have identified five additional Workspaces. We are now in the midst of establishing a new Master Workspace and building out the other additional Workspaces. Since launch of our initial phase we have establish complex business logic that runs many of our triggered and scheduled campaigns. Rebuilding these campaigns as inactive shells in the new master, pausing the old and reactivating the new will be extremely painful and time consuming. IDEA: Being able to clone an active Smart Campaign to another Workspace, and once cloned to the new Workspace all of the triggers are deactivated, essentially leaving it a clone waiting to be modified or reactivated would be extremely helpful and a time saver. I'm sure there are large complicated businesses that have run into this issue as well as their n
In an EMAIL notification that a user has an issue or project approval, they're able to see Priority in the notification without clicking into the details. This is helpful especially for high or urgent approvals. However in the respective TEAMS CHAT notification, no priority shows. The Chat is even better for this notification bc if it's high/urgent, they'll be able to quickly see that in the ping (and ppl tend to pay more attention to pings than emails). Want priority to show in the Teams chat notifications, or even just for high/urgent priority approvals.
Make it possible to set the default Action Timeout in the property settings
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.