Product Communities

A massive improvement to Marketo's field management capabilities would be create your own folders for better field management.  HubSpot, a competitor, already does this. Being able to create your own folders for managing fields would improve admin's ability to keep track of what fields already exist as well as their use case. A good example of this would be for email compliance related fields, or a preference center, where it's important to keep track of all the fields you use, and why you use them.  A similar ideas was published a few years ago - https://nation.marketo.com/t5/ideas/ability-to-group-custom-marketo-fields-in-various-folders/idc-p/260407

For ease of operations, I'd like to be able to (or automatically) have deleted (and inactive) SFDC campaigns not available to be synced to Marketo programs. Viewing deleted SFDC campaigns makes it harder to find the current ones I'm looking for without creating errors when syncing to my Marketo programs.

It seems surprising to me that this isn't already something Workfront is capable of, however after talking with support, it doesn't seem currently possible. The idea is that if two separate companies (actual companies, not companies within your WF instance) both utilize Workfront and have their employees setup in it, to be able to allow users from one company to have access as users in the other companies instance.As a real world example, if we as company A have a contract to get work done with company B, where people at company B would be responsible for certain tasks in our project workflow, it seems logical that if company B already uses WF for their own internal needs and users have accounts, that we would be able to add certain users from company B into our instance of WF at company A since they are already licensed/etc. Since this seems to not be possible, we at company A need to pay for licenses (or have company B pay of them) in order for those employees at company B t

Linking approvals in the proofing tool to a task. If you approve a proof, then your task associated with that approval with automatically close that task out instead of manually closing it out. We do not have Fusion.

When a task has been prematurely marked Complete, we would like the ability to set the Task status back to New--without the need to unassign and re-assign the resources. Currently, if the task status is set to New, the task will not show up on the Work List of the resources because the system shows they marked the task complete. I confirmed with tech support there is no work around for this behavior.

Would like the ability to turn off the option for requesters to copy their Issues, similar to the new ability to prevent users from copying projects. With the new ability to copy Requests coming in the 22.1 release, we don't want users to get confused and copy an Issue in the request queue vs copy a Request. Once submitted, many issues have additional custom forms added at later stages and we don't want anything outside of the original request to be inadvertently copied.

We need a mechanism to change the Timesheet Owner directly in Workfront.This update should transfer all hours associated with projects and general to the new userID.

It would be great if Marketo could consider allowing adding different fonts into the drop-down options with flexible modules? At the moment you can change the code to a specific font, and then when you pull through the module the font should be available, however, it would be much more user-friendly to allow this in the dropdown. Also marketers could then select to use different fonts to use within the module if needed. eg for a wsgswgy module you could set a different font as a heading, and then another for the paragraph copy.   In addition, there are some standard fonts, such as Open Sans, which would be good to include generally.

Problem: When running mboxtrace the output show us if we qualify into or do not qualify into a segment by segment id like this:"evaluatedCampaignTargets": [  {  "campaignId": 123456,  "campaignName": "My Activity",  "matchedSegmentIds": [  1234567  ],Feature: There  should be a place in Target where a customer can translate the Segment ID to the Friendly Name.

Today, when a Marketo customer uses a native CRM-based sync, Support has the option to map multiple fields together. This goes above and beyond the detection of Lead and Contact fields being linked in Salesforce. For example, if a Lead field and Account field share similar values, a mapping can be made to support both the Lead and Account version of the field as one field.    However, when using the default Marketo objects for a custom sync—Person and Company—there is no way to execute the same concept. As a result, any customer using a fully custom sync must then pull both the Person version of a field and the Company version of a field. CRM-synced customers do not have to do this.   Can the ability to map between Marketo's own objects (or at least between Person and Company) be implemented?

Provide an ability to customize the project header section in the layouts. (e.g. remove or show the 5 items on the top right of the project; 'Percent Complete' 'Project Owner' 'Planned Completion Date' 'Condition' 'Status'.)

We have that space in the middle of the Project screen header beside the Project Owner area and status box. We'd like to have the ability of adding fields in there or even after the Project owner area - just like ability to add fields in the my work area.

It would be really helpful to be able to run a report on a project's "Shared With" column. We need to ensure specific users ALWAYS have at least view access. It would be great if we can also report on what level of access the user, team or group has as well (view, contribute manage).

The issue: Cannot edit a one-time approval process while it is "active" or in use. This means that you cannot correct a user in the approval process without starting the approval process over again.Innovation lab idea: Allow for the ability to edit a one-time approval process while it is in use. This is already an option for global approval processes so it should be possible to implement the technology for single-use approval processes.

We receive time out messages randomly. We are told by engineering that this is a security function but this doesn't happen all the time. When it does it is very inconvenient when you have 20 -30 tab open trying to move jobs quickly and you have to log into every single proof again and again.Curious what is the need of this and how can it balance better with the user experience?

It would be helpful, when creating layout templates, to be able to see what the template looks like without necessarily having to assign it to someone, then login as that individual, then log back out to make further changes. A "preview" function would be helpful.

I want to be able to capture via a calculated field when custom text field has been changed. Current option is to look at the update feeds Update feeds captures thru Audit Text when a field change is reported in the update feed showing the before and after. Extracting thru text mode the Audit Text Entry date and making know which custom form field you are looking for and its corresponding entry date is nearly impossible.

In order to be able to optimize the best "send out time", it would be nice to be able to see, when profiles are clicking on links in newsletters.   What I am looking for is a standard report, which shows me how many profiles who clicked on a link between 8AM-9AM, 9AM-10AM, 10AM-11AM etc. A even better solution is to implement a solution, that automatically deliver the campaigns, when each profile typically click on a link:-)

It would be nice to be have a public URL of a newsletter/a campaign, which can be shared internally or on Facebook. Obviously, the public URL should not track any clicks on the URL's in the newsletter, but each link should still redirect to the individual URL's if someone click on a link.

Based on documentation and the community thread, it doesn't sound like there's currently a way for users to receive an email notification when a task without a predecessor is ready to start. We currently have users who miss the due date for the first task on a timeline since there is no email notification tied to that task without a predecessor. We have notifications for when a project becomes active turned off since this is triggered whenever the PM team places a project from planning to active, which is frequent.

We would like to have the ability to apply custom sorting/grouping to the new Home area. In My Work, we were able to do this by adding a custom field to My Work in the layout template (for example, "task owner") and in so doing, would have the ability to sort/group by that field in My Work. We specifically want the ability to sort by task owner, but I think this idea should apply to custom sorting/grouping in general.

We collect information for a business case in addition to the default fields available. We would like to display this information in the business case section as well. Furthermore we do not need some information in the business case and would like to hide these.So to summarize: it would be great to customize the selection of fields for a business case

Ability to add, edit, and remove items from the business case to allow for a more customizable way of working with this

As a Workfront user I want to be able to see the European date format when selecting the English (UK) language browser setting with the given format "mm.dd.yyyy" for all date entries.

Description -Why is this feature important to you - once we change data elements name in future, wherever we called in rules, it won't change. So we manually need to change data element name into rulesHow would you like the feature to work - whenever data element name getting changed, then it should automatically change inside wherever called in rulesCurrent Behaviour - not changing data element name in rules