Product Communities

We no longer have RCE in our instance and are not able to hide fields that were in use in RCE. This prevents us from doing clean up that is necessary to get and keep our instance clean.

"Recent Updates" will not display on timesheets if the "Show System Updates" toggle is not turned on by a user. A user must navigate away from timesheets to turn on the "Show System Updates" toggle in another object, such as a Project or Task. This is not intuitive and, at the moment, is not documented on the "View and manage comments on a timesheet" page in Workfront One. (https://one.workfront.com/s/document-item?bundleId=the-new-workfront-experience&topicId=Content%2FTimesheets%2FCreate_and_Manage_Timesheets%2Fview-and-manage-comments-timesheets.html&_LANG=enus)Please add the "Show System Updates" toggle to timesheets and update the Documentation on Workfront One so it's more clear and intuitive for the user to understand and manage the visibility of their timesheet "Recent Updates."

Hi Community,   Once I received a task where I need to send 3 emails to records as per activity on different dates, but I was unable to check that what number of records are stuck in which wait steps of Smart Campaign.   Although, We can see total records in wait step in a campaign but can not differentiate count between the further wait steps.

Currently, the used by tab of each field shows which assets (SC, SL, Email, LP, etc.) are referencing/using the field - it would be great to include a column for the email/LP assets with the module/section name/id along with their name, this'll help find/update/remove the database field token association and users would not have open every single asset to check where the token is being referenced in the asset. This can also be extended to custom tokens ({{my.}}) when used feature for them is released for GA.  

When expanding a project the tasks now appear to the left of the project. They have made the expand button take up much more space & put a little paper project icon to the left of the project title this combined takes up too much space. Nowit looks weird to me as the task names are to the left of the project title. Doesn’t look neat and it backwards in position to how you would expect a task to appear under a project.

Be given the ability to tag groups in a proof comment instead of having to add them through a workflow.

With the WF plugin for Teams Chat, it's great that you can reply to threads you're tagged in and it is published in the proper place in WF, but it would be awesome if you could START a thread on an object from the plugin in Teams chat too.

We have the "Project Completion to Project Team" notification enabled which notifies everyone on the project.It would be helpful if we had the option to notify only the Project Sponsor when their project is complete to cut down on emails/notifications. When people are finished with their tasks on a project they move on and don't care when the project gets completed. Thanks

It would be so helpful in Updates to be able to toggle conversation view on and off, or quickly be able to put updates and replies in date/time order. It's hard to locate the most recent replies if they're nested under an older update.

With the Release 22.2, there was a functionality introduced to allow Users to Edit/Delete a Comment within 7 seconds before it becomes permanent. But this option is only available of the Access Level option "Never allow users to delete comments" is deselected.This functionality needs to be separated from the more permanent access level, so that users can update a comment within 7 seconds if they need to and not have the ability to later delete a comment.

We would like the option to automatically set the company-level billing rate to override the standard system rates.

Ability to set up and use similar functionality to Advanced Column Rules on Chart, that would allow to call out specific data within a chart based on the grouped criteria. IE.. We use Pie Charts to show how much work is in our queues grouped by due date. Would like to be able to call out $$TODAY as a bold or a pull out or red text to allow users to do a quick assessment of the data being reported and what has the highest priority.

We'd like our sign-off team to be able to pick from a drop-down list of reasons as to why they rejected a document or a proof. If we can report on this, then we can understand the most common reasons for rejections and amends, and give colleagues the support and training they need to stop getting rejected for the same things over and over.

Hi Marketo Community, We have an option to download all Landing pages from design Studio but there is no option for emails and Forms. Sometimes, we need to audit all the emails and forms and we are unable to download all information at one place.

I find that I sometimes forget who the requester is once I get to the screen where I turn the Request into a Project, after having attached a template. It would be nice if the person requesting populated under Basic Information or somewhere near the top. Because we assign the requester as Project Sponsor, it's something I need to know once I get to that screen.

Would love to be able to stylize comments in Proof, Bold, Color, Italics, Highlight, Underline Options, so that they can be be implemented directly as intendend

A feature to show tasks that people may remember but are no longer valid by striking through completed tasks.

Currently a Typehead field must be connected to a "Referenced Object Type" which includes Company, Group, Job Role, Portfolio, Program, Project, Team, Template and User. While this is very helpful, the current Typeahead feature is limited in functionality and misses important option.Users should be able to connect the Typeahead fields to a list of values as an option to Checkboxes and Dropdowns allowing a single or multiple value selection. Example: We have a list of approximately 250 aircraft a user should be able to select from. Scrolling through a Dropdown list of 250 values is not practical. 250 Checkboxes is not a good option either.Short of having this option, we are using a Single Line Text Field for the user to enter the aircraft number which leads to inconsistent data entries. Please help !!!

Description - Allow asset transfers for Alerts, whether Enabled or Disabled, Active or Expired.Why is this feature important to you - We have a lot of employee churn, and when employees leave, the remaining employees may need to take over their assets, in this case expired as well as current Alerts.How would you like the feature to work - The Adobe Legacy User management console, attempting to transfer assets, including Alerts between users, the transfer of a disabled or expired Alert should work without error or issue. Current Behavior - Currently in the Adobe Legacy User management console, attempting to transfer assets, including Alerts between users, the transfer of a disabled or expired Alert doesn't work.  The UI seems to give the indication that 'transfer complete', but continually checking the old a new user for the transferred alerts, shows no change.

Request to see past PM who worked on this request - when you hover over a project and see the general pop up with info, it would be nice to see the past pm

Currently some of the smart list options have inconsistencies in the queries available for different data types.For example: Member of program: "Progam" has options "Is", "Is not", "Any". Program Status Was Changes: "Program" has options "Is", "is not", "Starts With", "Not Starts With", "Contains", "Not Contains", "Is Any".Another example Person Score: "Person Score" has options "Is", "Is not", "Between", "Greater Than", "less than", "At Least", "At most", "is Empty" "is "not Empty"Score was Changed: "Change" has options "Is", "Is Not"All fields should have a set field type String, Date, Integer,... All fields of the same type should have the same options available. By this my suggestion is to add the missing options (rather than remove available options)

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: In AEM 6.4, we are able to configure audit logs for have audit logs for User and group changes (creating/deleting users/groups and adding/removing users from group) but not for ACL permission changes. Having audit logs for ACL permission changes will be of great help when a content author reports an issue that he's not able access a path anymore for which the user had access to previously.  Use-case: This feature will be helpful where the content authors report issues saying they lost access to a specific path for which they had access earlier. Current/Experienced Behavior: No Audit logs for ACL changes, We have audit logs only for User and group changes (creating/deleting users/groups and adding/removing users from group) Improved/Expected Behavior: Audit logs for ACL permission changes done for a user/group Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 6.4.8 Customer-name/Organi

Month labelled at every week as it gets confusing when scrolling across 12 week view or multi month view (see attached)

MarketoとZoomで連携してWebinarを実施しているのですが、 複数のZoomアカウントと連携する際にトラブルを経験したので情報共有します。     Zoomの複数アカウントをMarketoに連携する際、Zoomの契約によって、エラーが発生するようです。 Adobeさんに調査いただいたところ、単体のZoomアカウントであれば複数の連携が可能でした。 一方でEnterprise版のZoomでは、1ユーザーは連携できたのですが、 複数のユーザーで連携しようとすると、1つのユーザー以外はエラーが発生しました。   これは、MarketoとZoomではアカウント単位での連携となっていて、 Enterprise版のZoomでは1アカウントを複数ユーザーに分けているため、 というのがエラーの原因と理解しました。   Enterprise版のZoomの複数ユーザーでMarketoとの連携を活用する場合は、 連携したZoomユーザーの設定の最下段にある「スケジュールする権限」に Enterprise版のZoomにある他の有料ユーザーを追加すれば、 Marketoと連携したユーザーとしてWebinarをスケジューリングできるので、 Marketoと連携してのWebinar開催が可能となります。   出来ないのは、Zoom Webinarを同日時に複数開催することだと思いますが、 この辺り、現時点では運用で回避するしかないようです。   ご参考まで。  

When editing the Planner access level, Workfront will not allow you to select "User Admin (All Users)" without also selecting "Create", "Delete". We want group admins to be able to pull users into their group, but we do not want them to be able to create or delete users.