Product Communities

Description - Options on what happens with the decision for those approvers that do not make one before the stage is locked. Why is this feature important to you -We have multiple approvers on our proofs that should be making a decision on the proof within their stage by a certain deadline. However, if the deadline is not met we need the proof to continue on through its remaining stages. The issue is the proof will continue to show on these users work list with no way to clear it because their stage is now locked and limiting their options to only view it that time. So the item remains in their work list until they are removed from the proof, make a decision (proof would need to be unlocked to do so or someone with the proper permissions would need to do it for them) or the proof is archived. None of these option provide a great user experience for the Approver nor for the Proof owner or Admin having to make the edits to clear the items.How would you like

Description - When using the Workload balancer it would be nice if when using the bulk assignments options it would dynamically change the filter on the assigned work section to the users matching the role selected on the role assignments options.Why is this feature important to you - It would save time having to switch filters based on different roles/teams.How would you like the feature to work - Selecting a specific role assignment would then only show workers associated with that role by default. If someone needed to do the task not associated with the role is needed, there could be an option to turn it off to see all or to use traditional filtersCurrent Behaviour - Selecting the role does nothing to filter and show users with that role association. 

For picklists with a large number of values (e.g. Country) in Marketo Forms, it can be time-consuming for someone to scroll and select the most appropriate value, whereas having a searchable picklist means that someone can narrow down the most relevant value to them up to 4x as quickly. This has a material effect on someone's likelihood to convert.

Quick idea here! I think it would be helpful to be able to see the fields that are in use in a form as well as what is set for "Follow Up With" in the Overview of the form (without having to create a draft). I mocked up what I was thinking these could look like using MS paint (so bear with me)! They could either fall under the Summary section or an entirely new section/tab could be created for them.   Image 1: Stay on page optionImage 2: External URL optionImage 3: Landing page option     To start, just have the field names would be great. A nice addition would be the ability to see if a field is required and what the field type is (image 4).  

Description - Planner currently shows you absolutely everything and the kitchen sink unless you filter it out, so even though I'm viewing this quarter, I see projects that have no scope within the quarter—some as old as two years. Why is this feature important to you - It's extra clicking to apply a time-based filter. Plus, if I want to scroll through time, I then have to adjust my time-based filter to follow me. The need to apply a time-based filter is unituitive.How would you like the feature to work - Let's make Planner smarter so that it lists only projects that have scope within the timeframe you're viewing. This would align it to the intelligence applied to Workload Balancer.Current Behaviour - I have to apply a time-based filter.

It would be great if administrators could regenerate failed proofs especially after Workfront Proof goes down like it did for us the other day, having to delete multiple versions across multiple proofs is quite inconvenient for our staff and time consuming in an extremely busy environment. This could work either by selection a Regenerate Proof link from the Version dropdown in Workfront, an API call or from within Workfront Proof itself. There is no way currently to regenerate a failed proof after the system goes down.

Description - If the Proof deadline is 5 days and the task deadline is 1 day, it is supposed to calculate both the proof duration and the task duration and make the task deadline 6 days.Why is this feature important to you - This will help us align both the proof deadline and the task deadline on the same page.How would you like the feature to work - Calculate both the proof duration and the task duration and make the task deadline equal to the total days.Current Behaviour - Proofing Deadlines Not Aligning to Task Deadlines

When using the /rest/asset/v1/files.json endpoint, being able to use MIME type as a querying parameter would be useful, especially when dealing with Design Studio instances where foldering has not been properly used. Being able to pull all PDFs with application/pdf or PNGs with image/png would be helpful for paring down results to just certain types of files. The MIME type today is already returned when using this endpoint.

The ability to add custom forms to a Team. In our use case, we have client-based teams, and we like to attach a custom form where we can reference other objects to the team, or even just add custom fields, calculated fields, or even basic Workfront fields.

Description - Enhance the Issue Stakeholder section are within the overview tab. Add the option to add user's names similar to assignments however the purpose is to grant view access automatically. In addition, this could be addressed by adding secondary and tertiary contacts that are automatically granted view access to the issue object.Why is this feature important to you - The field can then be pulled into reporting to allow for more than one stakeholder (entered by or primary contact are limited to two separate names at most).How would you like the feature to work - similar to assignments however the purpose is to grant view access automatically. Current Behavior - No field exists.

This will allow to better setup user interface through the Layout Template and will ensure that the users have all they need to start working right away. Currently I'm forced to Log In As each user and set the view/filter/grouping for them which is a lot of manual work.

Workload Balancer currently picks up from where it was left, so whatever weeks you were looking at will be viewed next time to connect. This is good for some people, but we also have users who wish it to be set back to the current week as default. It would be great to have this as an option in the Workload Balancer settings.ThanksMatt

Dear Team,         If there is a option for delete multiple unused images from a specific folder via API, it would be a great feature and also while browse files via API, if there is a option for tag unused images, its too good to use.

It is challenging to inline edit/add users names to the assignments field due to the small size of the box that appears. It would be ideal to expand the size of that box to prevent inadvertently assigning the wrong user because you cannot see full names. 

Description - when admin/project manager inputs start and end dates for tasks display the day of the week also.  (spelled out completely) ex: 6/21/2023 WednesdayWhy is this feature important to you -  As a company we have certain weekly processes that only happen on a specific day of the week.  If an end date is on or after that day of the week, the task cannot be completed.  Therefore this would help scheduler with making sure tasks end before that day of the week.How would you like the feature to work - at task input step, when start date is chosen: populate field with date and day of week.  That should also show in that format for employees on a project as they review their tasks.Current Behaviour - tasks just have a date.  example: 6/21/2023

Hello, It would be very helpful to be able to download the results of a data explorer report (csv, xls, ect...). This would allow end users to filter. The current set up if not user friendly and scrolling is a huge waste of time. Glenn

BackgroundCurrently, we are using the AAM Unused Signal Report on a repetitive basis to check each value-key pair individually for building new traits and their strategies. ChallengeWithin the 'Unused Signals Report' all signals can be exported as pdf/ excel etc., but it is a manual process and time taking. Sometime Unused Signal Report takes a lot of time to populate data for last 30 days. IdeaWould it be possible to:Create a scheduled export report (daily/ weekly/ monthly) for such unused signals (key value pairs)?Or may be a Bulk Export of Unused Signals into my Amazon S3 will work.

Currently you can add multiple filters and drop-down (including the new dynamic drop-downs) to the top of a panel. In order to help my end-users there's often a logical order to these filters, often going down in granularity from left to right. If a request is made to add a new filter the only option at the moment is to add it to the right. Considering everything else in the project is drag and drop to move/rearrange can functionality be added to all the panel filters/segments to be dragged around to change their order? The only option at the moment if you really want the filters/segments in a specific order is to delete them and re-add in the order you want. 

DescriptionWhen you drag multiple values for a dimension to the panel segment area and hold down SHIFT you can turn it into a dropdown to select each of the individual values. However it would be very useful to be able to just drag the dimension itself and get a dropdown of all valid values for that dimension Why is this feature important to youIt would massively simplify the creation of dashboards for things like campaigns where you can create a single campaign performance dashboard, but then have a dropdown of all available campaigns so you can select the one you're interested in (or choose ALL) to see performance for all campaigns. How would you like the feature to workIn a similar way to holding down SHIFT when dragging multiple values, maybe if I drag a single dimension and hold down CTRL-SHIFT it creates a dropdown of values for that dimension instead Current BehaviourCurrently if you drag a single dimension it just adds a "dimension exists" segment.

We've noticed that user notification settings have auto-updated from time to time, causing users to miss important notifications.Event notifications at the system and group levels have not been touched in quite some time, so that is not the cause.Users have reported that they didn't change their personal settings, and some didn't even know personal notification settings were an option. It would be great if Admins had the ability to track notification setting changes.  This might look like having notification changes somehow recorded in the update stream on the user's profile.Cheers!

Currently, the used by tab in the Marketo smart list does not show any people performance reports that are using them in the custom columns. SLs used in the custom columns can also be deleted w/o removing the associations from the reports, and this can easily become an issue where-in someone not knowing if the SLs are being used as custom columns in report(s) delete them just by looking at the used by tab of the SLs. It would be of great help if the used by also showed the people performance reports and prevented deletion of SLs if they're being used as custom columns in the people performance reports.

Every time I try to merge two leads in Marketo, I always get this error below. Please provide this capability. Why hasn't Marketo built support for this capability yet?

お世話になっております。 表題の件、Marketo作成LPにディレクトリ構造が持てるような運用やアップデートを希望します。  

Currently, in Marketo, you can only subscribe to receive notifications. If you would like to unsubscribe in bulk there is no option to do that. You can only unsubscribe from notifications via the notification email received. When you unsubscribe, you can only unsubscribe from the single notification type e.g. campaign failure, CRM sync etc - there are 16 different types. Would like to request that an unsubscribe option with checkboxes be included in this section. Additionally, admins should have access to unsubscribe notifications on behalf of other users.

 Why is this feature important to you - we can link directly to archived Activity Details pages as a build reference, but if we want to duplicate the activity we need to then go back to the query dashboard and find the activity that way, which takes a significant amount of time. It would be much easier to duplicate from a linkable page. How would you like the feature to work - You can add an option under the vertical three dots:Share to feedActivity QA*Duplicate activity* Current Behaviour - no duplication function on Activity Details page. I can only duplicate from activity search pageStatus