Product Communities

Description - When you share a project in Analytics Workspace, you have the option to share a dashboard with "anyone", which also includes anonymous users without an Adobe account.Why is it important - It's a good security feature to not allow every anonymous user to see a dashboard by default.How should it work - If you open the dialogue to share a project with anyone, the checkbox to require the Experience Cloud login should be activated by default.Current behavior - If you open the dialogue to share a project with anyone, the checkbox to require the Experience Cloud login is deactivated.

Description - When I looked into what the Default Filter was doing, it turns out it's "All my Teams." This includes inactive Teams, which I confirmed with support that this is intentional. This idea makes a case that the default should be active only.Why is this feature important to you - Admins deactivate things for good reason, ultimately because we no longer need to use them. Especially as a filter that is offered universally, it can be confusing to users to see filters pull in data that no longer applies, which can affect adoption, compliance, and retention.How would you like the feature to work - Set the Default Filter in Workload Balancer to All my active Teams."Current Behaviour - The Default Filter includes all teams, including inactive. The workaround is to copy the Default Filter and apply the active limitation manually.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary:  Avoid cyclic references of the experience fragments OR Show warning message of cyclic references of the experience fragments Use-case:  Avoid cyclic references of the experience fragments to impact overall instance performance Current/Experienced Behavior:  We had multiple critical situations on Production recently where a misconfiguration by author (causes Cyclic reference) started having huge impact on overall instance performance, taking almost 100% of CPU as well. Publishing the same page resulted in showing service outage exception (Referencetoodeep in the logs) page to the end user. Improved/Expected Behavior:  If author configures cyclic reference of the experience fragment, there will be a warning message OR cyclic reference cannot be configured Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable):  AEM as a could service &  AEM Release: 2023.3.1138

It is not possible to set the Access Expires date back to 'Never' once it is set.  We can only set the expiry to a future date (date value is valid until Dec 31, 2037). Would you please consider to display a warning message that 'Access Expires' date cannot be cleared when we try to delete the Access Expires date? https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/marketo/using/product-docs/administration/users-and-roles/managing-marketo-users.html?lang=en   == Steps to reproduce == 1. Move to 'Users & Roles' 2. Choose a test account 3. Set the date in 'Access Expires' (e.g. Dec 31, 2022) and save 4. Edit the same user and try to delete the value of 'Access Expires' 5. The same date is still displayed

Description - chronological order in the proof document Why is this feature important to you - It helps to review and correct the document in order.How would you like the feature to work - There should be an option to reorder the inside document in chronological order.Current Behaviour - showing the comment in chronological order

Description -Document comment notification is displayed as a group instead of an individual notification.Why is this feature important to you - It Helps to review the notification in a chain conversation.How would you like the feature to work -  When users click on the Notification tab, they should be able to view all unseen notifications related to a single document in a group conversation, rather than individual notifications.Current Behaviour - If there are multiple notifications related to the same record, they are displayed as individual notifications for each entry.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Related case #E-000856273 Use-case: Editor has to select one image --> create live copy. Then select second image --> create live copy. As there is no option for multi live copy option, this process needs to be followed individually for all the assets that needs live copies. Current/Experienced Behavior: Separate live copy request for each and every image Improved/Expected Behavior: Editors need to create Live copies of mutiple images in one click. It should work similar to creating Live copy of an entire folder. (Select folder --> create live copy). This copies all images from the source folder and creates live copies of images in live copy folder. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable):   Customer-name/Organization name:   Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Description - Have the ability to monitor segment usage such that we can know impact of either deletions or modifications of segments.  Why is this feature important to you - Allows a fast and quick way to manage segment usage and speed up QA of any segment changes How would you like the feature to work - Perhaps some extra column info in segment manager where once a link is clicked all impacted dashboards or scheduled reports are listed. Also notes if any segment is not used by either dashboard or scheduled report Current Behaviour - No way exists to day to do this  

Description - Add a setting to custom fields that displays whether or not the field is being used in Fusion or in an API integration.Why is this feature important to you - In order to ensure the Fusion and API integrations are accurate, when making changes to custom fields it would be beneficial to know if an update is needed in Fusion and API integrations as well.How would you like the feature to work - We would like the feature to look at all Fusion scenarios and API integrations to search if the fields is being used or not and display that information in the custom field settings.Current Behaviour - Currently there is nothing within the custom field settings that lets us know if the field is used in Fusion or API integrations. It would be a manual and time consuming process to search everything for the field.

It would be great to have the ability to move hours from one project to another. Long story short, a new contract was signed which means that I should have created a new project in the system but didn't realize it, and now my team has to go back and fix their timesheets (they are paying the price of my mistake). It would be nice if I didn't have to bug them and could fix it myself.

Would be great to be able to format (Bold, Italics, etc) in Project Details since that section can be very long. Would like to call out (Bold) areas that are important.

We can auto-attach custom forms to Projects and Tasks, but not expenses.We have custom Invoice and Receipt data we want provided with each expense, but this requires the user to make the effort to add the form rather than the system automating it.

Description - To better guide users in choosing filters, a description helps. Currently, even an admin can't update the Description of the Default filter.Why is this feature important to you - Defaults can be useful in streamlining administrative load because that means I don't have to make something if it already exists and meets our needs. How would you like the feature to work - Show a description of the filter so users can better assess when to apply the Default filter.Current Behaviour - There is no description associated with the Default filter. The only way to learn what the Default filter is is to copy it so you have edit fields.

We have an approval process attached to some of our request queues so when the person working on an issue feels they have completed their work, they can set the status to Closed - Pending Approval and the primary contact for the issue is automatically sent a request to approve or reject, which in turn closes or reopens the issue. This saves manual comments back and forth checking whether the primary contact considers the issue ready to close or not. We find that some primary contacts do not respond quickly to the approval request and would like the ability to send a follow up notification (perhaps 24 hours later) to the primary contact about any outstanding approval processes they are assigned to.

Description - similar to Excel, user would be able to freeze the Task Name and Number columnsWhy is this feature important to you - for Task List Views with lots of columns that require horizontal scrolling, user would be able to maintain visibility into the Task Name/# while scrolling to the right. How would you like the feature to work - not sure/open to ideas. perhaps a "freeze column" button. Current Behaviour - user must toggle between multiple views to see the necessary columns. 

It would be very helpful for reporting purposes to have the ability to define custom fiscal calendar dates in the Revenue Cycle Explorer since companies don't necessarily use the calendar year time frame for their fiscal year. I'm creating a dashboard for management and would like to include a report of leads generated by fiscal quarter. However, I am hesitant to present such a report as I am sure that reading a chart or graph with different quarters than they're used too will confuse them.

Description - When I have a project and need to attach another template, there is no option to add/remove forms from the template I am trying to attach.Why is this feature important to you - I need to fill out required fields on the form for the template I'm attaching. After the template is added, I have to go in and delete the form. How would you like the feature to work - Have an edit button when attaching a template to add remove forms like any other place found in workfront. Current Behaviour - Since there is a form on a template, if I want to add the template to an existing project, I am forced to fill out the form. Even if the form would not be applicable. 

We need the ability to dictate the order of how proof reviewers/approvers appear in the list on a Proof. With some proofing groups added at a time on a Proof, oftentimes we need to remove a few people from within the group or change their role. Would like to see sort options to sort by proof role or by name (alpha order) for people to be able to easily find names to remove or roles to change.

Hello Everyone,   We are facing deliverability issue in our client instance. We found that issues within outlook domain by using inbox placement analyse. There is a lot of outlook domains in database like @hotmail.com, @live.com, @msn.com. but we just wanted to know how many domains living in marketo database under Outlook domain.    I already tried that condition in smart-list that email contains "@outlook.com" but it helps to filter out only the email list which has exact @outlook.com. but  we need to pull out all outlook domains list.   Thanks, Kavinila

If an uploaded PDF already has annotations tied to it, the desire is for the system to recognize those as comments and have them automatically added

This can help with checks by another pair of eyes to ensure you haven't selected the same email twice. 

Description -Why is this feature important to you - We have various scenerio in our project to modify list variable data that has been collected erroneous. How would you like the feature to work - All Data Repair API functionality becomes available for List Variables.Current Behaviour - List Variables are not supported currently.

Description - we would like Workfront Calendars to be enhanced so they could display projects/issues/tasks for configurable timeframe Why is this feature important to you - It would give us view into larger time frame How would you like the feature to work - give capability to customize timeframeCurrent Behaviour - 'View' drop down has the only options - 'Month', 'Week', 'Gantt'

Description - The segments UI in AEP (RT-CDP) currently does not have a folder structure to manage the segments. For large customers, having folders and RBAC for the folders are important from RT-CDP use cases perspecive.Why is this feature important to you - Large customers create 10s of 100s of segments and folder taxonomy makes it easier to group by campaigns, geo, teams etc.How would you like the feature to work - There should be a folder view for the segments (like Audience Manager) and sub-folder structure to house the segments. It should also have RBAC for governance. Folders and sub-folders should be displayed in the search results to easily locate the placement of the segments.Current Behaviour - List and pagination based listing of all the segments created

We currently have 8 people who create projects via spreadsheet. This is important as they are creating anywhere from a small handful to multiple hundreds of Projects at a time. They each are responsible for a category of items that require Projects, so there's really no way at this time to consolidate to a couple users, as they are the keepers/managers of their own info.Unfortunately this requires all 8 of them to be full System Admin. So, these users have access to the whole backend and all the settings when they need a single access point - Kickstart import. I've built a PIN on their interfaces to take them directly to the Kickstart page, but it's still a bit nervy to have everything exposed where it could be accidently modified if someone got lost.Please fix. At least to a lower level Admin status that doesn't have access to the whole enchilada.