Product Communities

Aside from the label denoting the (sandbox) UI environment, would it be possible for it to be made visually a bit more different so that users working across both environment can clearly denote its the sandbox.  Maybe the header ribbon be a different colour? 

Date Field on custom formCan we have the ability to input and display the date in UK format.It currently displays in US format: Mar 2, 2022Our clients copy dates into these fields and having to type in this format is time consuming and frustrating for them.Time field on custom formPreviously there was a drop down menu to select the time it now auto reverts to the current time. Could we bring the drop downs back.

Thinking this report may have been created by someone already- Report that shows teams, groups, companies with no members towards clean up of unused objects.(thinking of @randyroberts and past amazing clean up report scripts).Thank You.

Custom Forms: Custom fields populated from lookup of (internal/external) data sourceIt would greatly enhance usability for both admins and general users if it were possible to create a Typeahead or Dropdown lists that reference internal-to-Workront sources (i.e. csv file uploaded as a Document? an admin-controlled table?) or external data source like gSheet or database. When the user chooses a value from a custom field from multi-choice options presented, the selected value should be used to start a query that looks up related values and returns them in either read-only fields or to another field presenting a subset of list of options (e.g. dropdown or typeahead) Example 1 - Read Only fields returned: If you have a Typeahead field on a form called "State". User types in string "CA" and the field looks up the external datasource column for State to populate typeahead suggestions User Gets typeahead suggestions of "California", "N. Carolina",

Description - add in the ability for a tally count of expense line items to be added to a report.Why is this feature important to you - Currently, only Issues, Tasks, Goals, and Risks tallies can be added. Expenses is the only item missing.How would you like the feature to work - Create a tally field for all expense line items on a project so it can be aggregated across all projects in a report.Current Behavior - function does not exist. If further details are required, Scotty Thompson is currently my remote consultant and can provide further details.

It would be amazing, if the Audio Waveform in the Timeline changes visually when you change volume with Clipkeyframes. 

-Current Situation: When an Issue is converted to a Project, the issue requester doesn't get a notification. -Enhancement: When an Issue is converted to a Project, the issue requester gets a notification via email confirming the issue has been converted.

It would be really helpful to be able to export everywhere a Segmentation is used; we have a Marketable segmentation and it won't approve and support suggested we remove some of the references and it's time consuming to pass of where we want to remove it vs. where it needs to stay to other team members. 

Description - When a person makes a decision on a proof and comments for that decision are switched 'on': those comments are not currently viewable in Workfront (confirmed by Support in case no. 00352989). These comments contain information, for example, about why a proof requires changes. Make these comments viewable in a Proof Approval or Document report so that proof submitters can see where re-work is required across all assets, rather than needing to go into each proof one-by-one. Why is this feature important to you - to save time and be able to report on rework comments across multiple proofs. Overseers should be able to review all feedback in one pane of glass. How would you like the feature to work - In a report, there is a column that pulls in Proof decision comments so that all decision comments can be read in a report if desired. Current Behavior - there is no way to pull in these comments at the moment, in fact, its hard to even find them (I've just discovered) - these sh

I've created a number of custom views for lead lists, and it'd be great if I could share these views with my team. There should be an option to make your views shareable to the rest of your team, but not editable by anyone other than the view owner. Sharing views would be epecially great for those who are new to Marketo!

Version numbers were added to the URL of every assets in Design Studio. Version numbers are designed to counter act a caching system so that there is always an up-to-date version every time the desired asset is refreshed or changed. This is fine, if there is a caching system that forces you to do so, which Marketo does not. If a cache is enabled that forces you to add a version hook at the end, removing or changing the version number to an older version should change it back to that previous version, again, this is not the case in Marketo as all previous versions of the PDF or image are updated when replaced making version control pointless.   This needs to be removed or, at the very least, an option to remove it (and no, copying the url and deleting it manually after pasting is not a solution).   Also, FIX THE DESIGN STUDIO SEARCH!!!

Description - It seems really odd to me that the functionality available in the CC plug-in does not mirror what is in the platform. If a proof owner is adding a new version of a proof from the CC suite, to the same approval chain. The approvers are not remembered on the new version unless they are fixed from the templated proof workflow. Meaning if the approvers are changed as the template is applied, any future versions will not automatically add the same users to the next round of approval but only when uploaded from the CC suite, if you follow the same logic in Workfront the approvers are retained. Why is this feature important to you - I have clients that do not want to use the plug-in as it makes it more difficult as they cannot use the plug-in for all versions of proofs so its easier for user to be in Workfront for all proofing activities How would you like the feature to work - Match the behaviour in Workfront automated approvals so they same is true when using automat

Description  My use case:I need to segment and select values for only some of our internal marketing ID's (let's say my "wanted" list involves ID's "A", "B" and "C" and my filter is therefore: "equals any of A, B, C"). The filter however will also include ID's that are not in my wanted list (for example "D"), meaning in a built view in my workspace I will see values for A, B, C and D. Cause: This happens because in our implementation, for some cases the same hit triggers several ID's together (in business terms - we are showing several marketing objects simultaneously). For example one hit would have the ID "A" and simultaneously also "D". (I.e. a list evar then has both values)Result: This means my segment returns ID's and values for both, "A, D" and any table I build in an Analytics workspace will have the unwanted values appear as well. Alternatively phrased - a list evar can not be segmented in such a way. Note. There is a solution - I can manually filter them out, but th

Currently, users who have the new Commenting Beta enabled can’t see comments made by users without the Commenting Beta enabled when accessing comments from an email notification. They can only see these comments after refreshing the page by accessing a different tab and returning to Updates. Per Adobe support, this is functioning as intended. However, it is not an ideal user experience. We would like users to be able to see all comments, regardless of whether they have the Commenting Beta enabled or not. Further, our team was told that once the new Commenting feature is enabled for everyone, updates made prior to the feature enablement will no longer be visible. It is essential for our users to have access to all previous comments/updates, as we rely on the updates stream for record keeping. Losing access to these comments/updates would cause us to lose critical information associated with projects and issues. We would like all previous comments/updates to remain visible in the Co

When working with creative/graphic teams, over & over I hear the request to have coloring or shading options to project plan tasks. I have heard this request so many times, that I am now submitting it to Workfront. ex: Parent Tasks can be a different color/shade. ex: Critical path tasks can be a different color/shade. For some users, having the coloring options would really help with adoption.

Add some presets to the date searches such as This Year, Last Year, Q1, Q2, etc. Why is this feature important to you - Saves time using one of the most powerful tools in WF.How would you like the feature to work - When I am using the company wide search filters allow me to choose preset dates instead of typing them in. Current Behaviour - In order to search for projects from the previous year I have to type in the dates. A couple of presets would streamline this process.  Referring to project/document searching in WorkFront.

Description - When clicking the star in the top right to display favorites, I'd love the ability to drag around the order of items that appear here.Why is this feature important to you - I like to keep the projects I'm following well organizedHow would you like the feature to work - I'd like to be able to drag around the order of items saved to my favoritesCurrent Behaviour - Items are fixed in the order they were added to favorites 

DescriptionIn a project template, I want to assign certain tasks to users based on their relationship to the project, as opposed to their Job Role. E.g., I want to assign the task "Project Setup" to whichever user is the Project Owner. Or, assign "Set Project Priority" to whichever user is the Program Owner in which the project resides. Or, assign "Provide Follow Up Feedback" to whomever was the Converted Request Originator. In all these examples, there often isn't a placeholder role that can be assigned to the template task because the users referenced by these terms don't typically share the same set of job roles. Why is this feature important to youThis feature would reduce the burden of project administration and user error, since there is currently no mechanism to make these types of assignments in bulk.   How would you like the feature to workWhen a template is applied to a project, Workfront would replace these placeholder roles in the template tasks with whichever user is

Description - For enterprise companies that have thousands of users accessing Adobe Data Warehouse: There is no visibility into where users send their files from an admin perspective, without initiating a report request from Adobe. (No self-service governance)There is no way of knowing if the reports being sent are done so using secure methods. Nor is there a way of displaying SFTP options ONLY.There is no control for where files can be transferred.Why is this feature important to you - With no alert system, control, or visibility into who is sending what information and where, we leave ourselves extremely vulnerable to malicious intent or interception from external hackers. The Adobe products pride themselves in encouraging self-service models but they lack appropriate governance capabilities to ensure everyone can operate with a safety net.  How would you like the feature to work - At a minimum, we would like admins to have the ability to control what locations are ava

Hi Adobe Team, I was wondering if we could 'block' dates on the due date calendar so it will prevent a high volume of requests when our capacity is exceeded. For example, when submitting a request, the user wouldn't be able to choose a date if it had been marked as unavailable by an Admin user. This would be fantastic as it would help prevent overwhelming my creative team, encourage project managers to plan their requests in advance and save Admin users time by not requiring them to ask for extra time. Thank you very much for considering my suggestion! 🙂

Hi all, I am requesting that Workfront add a new notification setting that would send a notification to the Team that's assigned to a task or issue after the task/issue's Approval Process has been completed. Currently, there are only settings for individual assignee's (not teams)on the task/issue to get notified when the task/issue approval process has been completed. Extending this functionality to teams would be very useful for us.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Apply Metadata Profile properties to assets when they are moved into a folder, that is associated with that property.  Use-cases: 1. User uploads an asset to a folder "upload" for pre-screening. From here, the assets are moved to their final destination to complete the meta data. 2. User accidentally uploads asset to the wrong folder and successively corrects by moving into the proper folder.  Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently, metadata Profiles are applied only when assets are uploaded to a folder. They are not applied, when an already uploaded asset is moved from another folder into the marked folder.   Improved/Expected Behavior: Issue: The above is somewhat unintuitive: User apply metadata profiles to ensure, that all assets in that folder have the same set of defaults. There is no reason not to apply the profile on move. I.e. we end up with a mix of assets in a folder. Some assets have the pr

Demande de résumé des améliorations des fonctionnalités (RFE) : Be able to reach Inbox in one click or one shortcut Cas d’utilisation : Inbox used when workflow takes time Comportement actuel/expérimenté : Today inbox is bellow notification, it's not easy way to reach it Comportement amélioré/attendu : gain of time to access to this inbox Informations sur l’environnement (version d’AEM / service pack, et autres informations spécifiques si applicables) : AEM CLOUD Nom du client/de l’organisation : RIASSE NATHALIE / LOUIS VUITTON Copie d’écran (si applicable) :   Package de code (si applicable) :  

Demande de résumé des améliorations des fonctionnalités (RFE) : Be able to multiselect inbox message to clean them Cas d’utilisation : to have notification of inbox not always +100 Comportement actuel/expérimenté : select one by one to suppress Comportement amélioré/attendu : select all or multiselect to suppress Informations sur l’environnement (version d’AEM / service pack, et autres informations spécifiques si applicables) : AEM CLOUD Nom du client/de l’organisation : RIASSE NATHALIE / LOUIS VUITTON Copie d’écran (si applicable) :   Package de code (si applicable) :  

Demande de résumé des améliorations des fonctionnalités (RFE) : We have developped on UI specific buttons and columns, to switch new UI, we need these customised buttons & columns Cas d’utilisation : benefit new UI Comportement actuel/expérimenté : custom buttons & columns Comportement amélioré/attendu : new UI of AEM support customised button and columns Informations sur l’environnement (version d’AEM / service pack, et autres informations spécifiques si applicables) : AEM CLOUD Nom du client/de l’organisation : RIASSE NATHALIE / LOUIS VUITTON Copie d’écran (si applicable) :   Package de code (si applicable) :