Product Communities

Description - Allow paragraph returns in the new commenting feature within the Updates tab.  Why is this feature important to you - We use a column in our reports for Status Updates.  This allows us to identify WINS, TO-DOs, STUCKS/IMPACTS and DECISIONS.   We can't use paragraph returns, bullet points, or numbered items, in the descriptions of the project Status Update.How would you like the feature to work -  This feature currently works if you turn off the Commenting within the Updates.  Allow the same formatting to work in the new Commenting feature.  This will allow the use of paragraph returns, bullet points, or numbered items, in the descriptions of the project Status Update.Current Behavior - Currently,  in the new commenting feature within the Updates tab, the formatting does not allow the use of paragraph returns, bullet points, or numbered items, in the descriptions of the project Status Update.

Description - It would be great if the Kanban Team board was searchable. Currently there is a filter by assignee, but it would be great if one could search by project or task name or reference# Why is this feature important to you - Our creative team often has discussions based on 1 specific project. During this meeting, it would be beneficial to search or filter on just that project to see where the various stories are in the process.How would you like the feature to work - Have the search feature at the top of the Kanban board like it is in other sections of Workfront.  Current Behaviour - Can only filter by assignee right now.  

Description - Today I learned (TIL) that there is a character limit on the description field for a Job Role. I can live with the character limit, however when I first ran into it, Workfront didn't deliver a clear message describing that there was a limit.Why is this feature important to you - The world is a happier place with clear error messages. It's frustrating when you receive little to no guidance on what went wrong or how to fix it.How would you like the feature to work - Apply a popup message that says something like, "Your description cannot be more than x characters."Current Behaviour - When editing the description of a job role in-line and you reach the character limit, the only indication that you have done anything wrong is a read line around the box with a tiny red exclamation mark (see screenshot). When editing the description of a job role in the Edit form, then try to save your changes, you receive a more clear error popup (see second screenshot).

Description - Create project interdependencies through tasks without deleting the tasks Why is this feature important to you - A proper solution would avoid redundant issue creations and demonstrate relationships between projects better. It may also provide ability to visualize dependencies in an easy to understand way. How would you like the feature to work - The task not be deleted from the task list after its conversion to a project, or create the ability to relate a task to a project. Current Behaviour - The only means to create relationships is through issues. When a task is converted to a project, the task is deleted from the task list.

Description - When creating a request, it would be essential for our marketing department to be able to add user with the external user access level to the primary contact of the request. Currently we are unable to add users that are external users.Why is this feature important to you - This is important for our marketing department because we work hand in hand with partner/sister cities on marketing needs, workflow and approvals.How would you like the feature to work - We would like to see the external users access level users populated in the drop down of Primary and Secondary contacts fields.Current Behaviour - Currently only internal or users with an access level above external users are populating.

Description - Please provide ability for creating reports on changes in time done to a default or custom filed on the custom forms.Why is this feature important to you -it makes it possible to track changes in time for particular fields on the forms. How would you like the feature to work - More fields being available for the Updates through reports so that historical versions of field value changes can be pulled on a dashboard or in reports. Current Behaviour -  Very limited number of fields are available to pull historical data on.

Description - Add more formatting features to the Text Field with Formatting typeWhy is this feature important to you - It enhances readability of the textHow would you like the feature to work - Have more formatting options available, such as font colorCurrent Behaviour - Text formatting options are very limited

Description - quick action of adding a document does not allow you to tag people, this should work just like it does within the documents section.Why is this feature important to you - this feature will save our whole team time from not having to drill into the project then documents then folder using the quick action featureHow would you like the feature to work -  this should work like tagging within a document just allow you to tag during a quick action Current Behaviour - Quick actions will allow you to add a document but not tag anyone- what is the point if we can't notify.

Description -Add the ability to set Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels for documents from within Workfront.Why is this feature important to you -Our organization is requiring all documents within our agency to have a sensitivity level, and be able to set this within Workfront would save time. See more information about these sensitivity labels here:  https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/sensitivity-labels How would you like the feature to work -Ideally we'd be able to set the sensitivity label of each document in the 'Documents' tab of a request or project. Current Behaviour -This is not supported in Workfront. 

For easy one-click accessibility, it would be helpful to have the following options in the Setup > Interface > Layout Templates > Home and Summary section:+Display the Documents section for quick access to any Files attached to a Project.+Along with the above, include the option to View and/or Download any File needed.Thanks for your time.

Description - Move long Proof Comments conversations to the proof updates sectionWhy is this feature important to you - Our teams love WF proof mainly for their ability to communicate with each other real-time via the proof comments. Some of those conversations can get pretty long. They are aware of the ability to take the conversation to the proof updates section - but they fare wary of leaving the actual proof (for some reason). How would you like the feature to work - In the case of those long conversations, it would be so cool if they could "send" the proof comments to the proof updates section once they have had their say. Leaving only the resolved comment. Current Behaviour - Proof users are reluctant to "leave" the proof to take long conversations into the proof updates section. Currently they have the conversations in the proof and then go through and delete all of the conversations, leaving only the resolved comment, or by starting a new comment all together wit

I was surprised when i realized this is not currently a feature. It would be great to be able to control the universal calendar as an admin, to be able to easily input across all users the company holidays.   Right now the only workaround i've figured is to create a separate holiday calendar and share it with every person?

Description - Would love the ability to pin a comment to always come to the top of a proof.   Why is this feature important to you - This would be really helpful for making sure the wider team sees the provided context for the asset that's being reviewed, even if they first look at the proof after 10-50 comments have been made.   How would you like the feature to work - Would like for the proof owner and/or an Author and/or Moderator to be able to choose one comment that they can pin (or unpin, in case they chose the wrong one). That comment would then be the first/top comment for everybody viewing the proof unless it's unpinned.    Current Behaviour - Context is added via a comment on the proof, and then is quickly lost when more comments appear and we have to repeat the information multiple times. 

Description - Workfront to update their charts to show bar charts in numerical order from 1-9, then 10-19, then 20-29, and so onWhy is this feature important to you - When running a report in WF as a chart, the numbers are out of order. The bars start with 1, then go to 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, then back to 2, then 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, then back to 3 and so onHow would you like the feature to work - I would like bar charts to sort the numbers in numerical order from ones to tensCurrent Behaviour - Currently bar charts are not in numerical order if you have numbers greater than 9

Currently, the Computed Attribute feature does not support fields based on the `relationship` XDM construct.If using one of those, you will get a 500 error upon publishing Why is this feature important to you:Ability to use relationship exists at schema level, you'd want to be able to leverage this across the product, including when building Computed Attribute for added flexibility. 

We have dozens of web services making REST API calls into our Marketo instance on a daily basis. Getting "web service error" notifications is great, but they aren't actionable at all for us since we have no way of knowing which web service / api user is making the calls that are failing. Having the API user included in these notifications would enable us to quickly troubleshoot. Having to reach out to Marketo support every time one of these errors comes up is ridiculous.

For the new Data Warehouse layout, we really need a quick option to input an email on a field and have the file be sent to that email. Currently we need to add an account and add a location, where most of the mandatory fields are not relevant for email exports and ends up being very confusing. Email is currently the destination of the majority of the exports so it would make sense to have a quick way to set it up.

Description - Add "Project Priority" field to the items that can be customized to project header Why is this feature important to you -  Easy way for project team to see the priority at a glanceHow would you like the feature to work - I love that you can now customize what is on the project header, just wishing this was one of the items that coudl be added and edited from there. Current Behaviour - Project priority field is not able to be added to the project header. 

Hello,here's an idea that was already shared in the past. I would like to re-enter it for the development team, together with a workaround that might interest some of you, Workfront users and experts. The idea first: for all "traffic managers", it would be nice to have a kanban board with existing projects and some of their properties. The new boards have been developed for issues and tasks only, and we hope that the concept will be extended to projects soon. For the meantime, I've just implemented for one of our team a workaround, without interactivity (yet?), to display their projects in such a board, using Fusion. The scenarios are quite easy to create. The principle is to create issues corresponding to the projects (tasks can also be used in theory) in a dedicated project . A board is then linked to that project.A first Fusion scenario is watching for new projects and create corresponding issues = cards in the board (2 modules)A second Fusion scenario is wachting for

A user whose issue has been solved and closed wants to reopen the case because something has to be done again (correction, enhancement, …). To reopen the issue the user can move the slider or change the status.What we need: If the user reopens the issue, a popup window should appear where he can (or maybe must) write a comment why he reopens the issue.It is also important that the people assigned to the issue are notified that the ticket has been reopen.

The addition of a "Sort Results by Year" filter in Adobe Workfront would significantly enhance user experience and streamline workflow efficiency. As a user who regularly interacts with the platform, I find it increasingly challenging to navigate through a growing volume of data spanning multiple years. The existing date filters provide a useful range-based selection, but a dedicated year filter would offer a more intuitive and precise way to isolate and review information. This feature is essential for users like me who frequently need to track and analyze project progress, client interactions, and other critical data points year by year.The envisioned functionality is straightforward—integrating a simple dropdown menu or clickable interface where users can select the desired year would instantly organize and display results exclusively for that specific timeframe. This targeted approach would eliminate the need for manual date range adjustments and expedite the search process. Curren

It would be great if custom forms could be made available on issues/projects/tasks based on their status. Some teams need a form added based on where the work item is in its progress and currently the forms need to be added manually or by a Fusion automation. I would love to see this as something I could offer my teams. 

Being able to change the layout of reports, not just add or remove columns.A colleague in marketing has requested a report of top pages viewed by MQLs and SALs, to see what content is being viewed the most by those groups and where either we're lacking content or have something particularly strong we can replicate. I've created a Smart List looking at MQL and SAL Lifecycle stages with blog views in the last 30 days but the report gives me the people and the referrer, when what I need is a report broken down by the page and the number of times it was viewed.Because we're looking at it against Lifecycle Stage it isn't something that can be done in GA, and I know the data I need exists in Marketo, but there's no way to get it out without doing a Smart List for each page. 

Description - It would be helpful if we could assign reminder notifications to "all requests" coming through a queue / queue topicWhy is this feature important to you - It is labor intensive to go into every request as it gets submitted through a queue topic to assign a reminder notification.  How would you like the feature to work - Assign a reminder notification per queue topic in the queue topic setupCurrent Behaviour - Currently, a user must to go into every request as it gets submitted through a queue topic to assign a reminder notification manually.

Description - Allow the audience rule to look at events "In the last x days of this month". Why is this feature important to you - In order to achieve "in the last x days of this month", the marketer must explicitly select the last 2 days of the month using the "From date to date" options. From month to month, the marketer must then change the last two days of the month. We need an option to set "last x days of this month" so that a marketer doesn't need to modify the audience rule month-to-month.How would you like the feature to work - Similar to the "This Month" and "In Last" options, we would like to be able to combine these two options ie. "In the last 2 days of this month". This option would be available in the drop down shown in the attached screenshot. So for the month of November, "In the last 2 days of this month" would look for events that occur on 11/29 and 11/30. In the month of February, this configuration would look for events that occur on 2/27 and 2/28; similarly f