Product Communities

DescriptionWe just migrated from Adobe Analytics to the Web SDK, we are using the XDM Object Data Element to do the Mapping with the existing Data Elements. To decrease the amount of work required for that migration we found out that the best option was to do the Mapping at the value level for both eVars, pros & events.  Current BehaviourWe noticed that the Web SDK hits were sending empty string and empty object, what Adobe Analytics hits were eliminated by default. We did not have to worry about this before the Web SDK migration. How would you like the feature to workWe would like that the Web SDK just work the same way the Adobe Analytics was working, just discard all the variables that are empty or undefined.Why is this feature important to you Until now we were looking at the data only in Adobe Analytics and the reporting was working fine even without the non-optimized Web SDK hits, but now that we are trying to work with the Adobe Experience Platform, we no

Description - It would be nice, if this field type would also provide the possibility to select more than one entry.Why is this feature important to you - to have a "dynamic" dropdown field, which does support all features of static dropdown fieldsHow would you like the feature to work - similar to Multi-Select DropdownCurrent Behaviour - only one selection possible

Zusammenfassung der Funktionsverbesserungsanfrage (RFE): Let authors unlock webpages to be used by authors of another website of the same AEM instance. (aka Page Sharing) Anwendungsfall: We run multiple websites in our AEM instance. Those websites have cooperations going on. One say that they can take over news from each other.   Authors had to copy and paste the news text and create and rebuild a totally separate page for it on their own website.   We did an attempt by telling them to store the news text in content fragments. Content fragments can be embedded by all websites on the instance. That works. However, the content fragements only the text without any components a news page may also contain (quotes, images, videos -etc.). So authors must replicate the components each time anyway. Aktuelles/erlebtes Verhalten: We do content fragment sharing, but authors are unhappy, because of the missing components. Verbessertes/erwartetes Verhalten: Authors of webpages

Description - Always make the project name viewable by forcing the project name space to be longer or allow it to wrapWhy is this feature important to you - We often prefix project names so to see the full name of the project, you have to mouse over to see the full name of the projectHow would you like the feature to work - Make the project name character space wider even when screen size shrinks and after a certain size, have the name wrap to line 2 so the full name can always be read no matter what the browser size.Current Behaviour - When viewing the Project page, if you have a narrow screen or are magnified in your browser, the Project Name field only shows a few characters.  You can't read the entire name unless you mouse over.  And if you make the screen more narrow, it keeps all the white cell padding between the right side nav fields (%, Owner, Date, etc) yet the name field shrinks even smaller.

Description - Currently, when a task (and other objects) are pending approval, no changes can be made other than posting updates and adding documents. There should be a setting that Admins can enable to allow custom form editing while a task is pending approval. Reason being, if rejected, team members need to be able to add in rejection reasons or fill out QA checklists on custom forms BEFORE making a decision.  Current Behaviour - Currently, if a task is pending approval then no changes to the custom form can be made. This requires the user to first make a decision and then go back and capture rejection reasons. However, once they make the decision the email to the Task Assignee has already gone out and that information for them to review isn't there at the same time.

Description - Approval Process automatic status change upon approval (similar to the approval option to automatically change to a status when an approval is rejected.Why is this feature important to you - Automatic status change would remove the user having to manually change the status upon approvalHow would you like the feature to work -Add an option in the approval process that allows the user set up to "Choose what happens when the approval is Accepted" similar to the current option- "Choose what happens when the approval is rejected:" 

Users are getting errors and losing all their work when they try to delete one of the forms on a request.Edit all forms > realize they no longer need one of them > delete it and try to save and get an error you can't get rid of.  They lose all the work they did.  Seems that the system gets confused as it is trying to save your edits and delete the form at the same time and doesn't know which one to do.Support suggested I put this here as maybe a fix one day.

When we are looking at a project we cannot see the full project name because it gets cut off. See screenshot attached. It's a huge nuisance. I wonder if we could control text wrapping or font size to make it so we can see what we're looking at on our smaller screened MacBook Pros?The lack of color control on text is also disappointing. I'd like to have all of our project names appear as red so it's quick to see (instead of looking up at the breadcrumbs) where you are in the hierarchy. 

Description - My organization can't set up the SharePoint Graph API integration since the set up requires my organization Admin Approval to allow Workfront to access SharePoint, rather than using a predefined set up as used in SharePoint Integration legacy set up. My organization only uses the predefined set up to grant app access. Can a predefined set up be available to access SharePoint Graph API? Why is this feature important to you - We would like to use SharePoint for documents 

Description:Enabling CMYK color code for docs uploading in Proofing environment.Why is this feature important to you:We at Disney use Workfront for request and approval process of both digital and physical designs. We recently noticed the difference in colors in the PDF or JPEG uploaded to WorkFront so we created ticket to Adobe experience league. The issue was identified that we use CMYK color code for our proofs whereas Workfront only supports RGB. The common solution provided to this was to embed the RGB color code to the proof, but we cannot to do that in our case. As mentioned, the documents are used for both digital and physical printing purposes and the print media team only accept CMYK color coded designs.How would you like the feature to work:Our request would be to add the color code to Workfront Proof environment and deviate the color differences. As a developer, I know this is a big ask, but this issue stops the utmost necessity of using Workfront in our company with a

Need the proofing in Workfront to support all print CMYK documents for printing. Printers do not use RGB. Colors look different in in RGB and in CMYK and when proofing in WF need to see/proof the file correctly. And why does it look good in Adobe Acrobat and different in Adobe Work Front, they’re both Adobe products.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Custom Author environments' domains Use-case: custom author domains not available - hard for the dev and business teams to use the system Current/Experienced Behavior: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/implementing/author-tier/accessing-the-author-tier.html?lang=en Improved/Expected Behavior: We need to have author domains customized as we do have for publishes Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloudservice Customer-name/Organization name: ABB Information Systems LTD Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

I know this is probably better off being sent to the PDF Services Support so I will also submit it there if I can find a place.  Description - Allow the use of InDesign documents as templates for the PDF Services Document Generation Module.Why is this feature important to you - We require a system that can handle document generation to provide custom on-brand but templated documents to 1000+ stores. Unfortunately, Office documents will not be sufficient. Since we already use Workfront and InDesign quite heavily it would be nice to keep the users in one system.How would you like the feature to work - It would be great to allow Workfront to be used as a front end to make requests for frequently used document designs. The requestor could fill out a custom form and then get either an InDesign document or a PDF file with the blanks/tokens filled in via Workfront Fusion and the PDF Services Document Generation Module.Current Behavior - The PDF Services module does not allow In

Description - As a system admin, my team and I really like the look of the new home screen. However we have been reluctant to roll it out because we don't have control over which widgets can appear and the filters and views we use in our dashbord reporting don't translate to the widgets. Giving the group admin greater granular control over the home screen and how it appears (through the use of layout templates) would allow us to lean in and scale this for our users.  Why is this feature important to you - As a system admin we need to be able to efficiently support our users. The ability to control what individual users or use cases see allow us to effectively and efficiently target our support. If end users are able to configure their home screen any which way, support becomes very challenging over a large number of users. Consistency of experience is key.  How would you like the feature to work - I would like the new home screen to be a function of the layout

In the Workload Balancer, tasks only show in teal = planning and green = current. It would be helpful to distinguish "ready to start" tasks vs "not ready to start" tasks. Resource Managers want to use the Workload Balancer to see which tasks can be reassigned to help even out workloads among the team.

Clear indication of which specific tasks or other factors are causing a project status to be “At Risk” - this is often a guessing game

Next to the request of having a WYSIWG Description in the Task, one of our main pain points is, that we cannot setup Parent & Child projects. Already in 2017 someone has brought that up (https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/workfront-ideas/parent-child-projects/idi-p/520427) but nothing happened although the idea had over 500 likes.   Let me shortly describe why this would be so important. We have several customers that work with a year-to-year development budget. Means it is too much for only having one project in Workfront. But it is also no solution to have several projects with no connection as we need the summary of hours, budgets etc. and additionally to that a Gantt that shows all relevant tasks of the different projects. Thinking one step further, this Gantt should then also be able to be shared with the customer.   I am really curious if something like that is on the roadmap otherwise I am confronted with 20 project managers who all look for add

Description -Why is this feature important to you - Users currently see all statuses in the system (including statuses from inactive groups) when using a prompt. This is a poor user experience when they see numerous statuses that they don't recognize.How would you like the feature to work - Limit the statuses that appear to System Statuses and statuses from groups the user belongs to. Current Behaviour - All statues in the system appear, regardless of which group the status belongs to and even statuses from deactived groups currently appear, making the drop-down list much longer & more confusing than it needs to be for end users.  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: We observed that the ON/OFF Time OOTB- feature is not getting horned on dynamic media-enabled assets. Use-case:   Current/Experienced Behavior:   Improved/Expected Behavior:   Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 6.5.12 AMS  Customer-name/Organization name: Intel Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: OTB Workflow triggering Email service as assets are pushed from Brand Portal to AEM are incorrect. Use-case: The default workflow when pushing assets from Brand Portal to AEM has the following status - 1.  The contribution folder asset-sourcing-test is queued for publish to AEM.2.  The contribution folder asset-sourcing-test is successfully published to AEM.The 2nd mail comes even if the Asset Contribution Status in Brand Portal is marked as "Failed" in Status. This is incorrect as it gives user the perception that the push from Brand Portal to AEM is successful. Current/Experienced Behavior: Current mail states " The contribution folder asset-sourcing-test is successfully published to AEM." Improved/Expected Behavior: The mail should state that " The contribution folder asset-sourcing-test failed in publishing to AEM. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if a

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: There was an update a while back which changed the functionality of content sets copy  tool to continue and succeed even if there is an issue with a given path. This is not an ideal change as we rely on Content Copy statuses to do certain things like notify our users when a path fails and we are now receiving false positives. We would like the option to return the functionality to how it was before which is to give a status of fail and cancel the copy if there is an issue with the path or the path does not exist Use-case: Routine Content Copy Current/Experienced Behavior: Copy succeeds even if path does not exist Improved/Expected Behavior: Copy should fail if path does not exist or issue with a given path Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMCS Customer-name/Organization name: Chipotle Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary:     Be able to bulk edit smart cropping of images Current/Experienced Behavior: Users need to select each image one by one and then enter the smart crop editor to adjust. Doing this for 100 images one after the other is time-consuming.  Improved/Expected Behavior: User selects 50 assets in bulk --> Smart crop --> Adjust the smart cropping on all assets --> Save All Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Assets Cloud service (latest version) Customer-name/Organization name:   Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Case Insensitive Asset Upload in AEM Use-case: Currently, if we upload assets - abc.pdf and ABC.PDF - They are treated as different assets in AEM (Your local machine's storage parses it in case insensitive manner)The JCR stores the nodes abc.pdf and ABC.PDF as 2 distinct nodes. Most storage systems even in different OS (Mac | Windows) store files by default in case insensitive manner. Current/Experienced Behavior: The assets are treated as different due to their case difference. Improved/Expected Behavior: The assets should be treated as similar and versioning popup should be displayed. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 2023.11.14227.20231108T162349Z Customer-name/Organization name: TA Digital Screenshot (if applicable): N.A Code package (if applicable): N.A  

Description - We would like the ability to bulk update our schedules with the appropriate public holidays. Or have it set automatically.Why is this feature important to you - Without this feature, Administrators who use schedules for this need to manually go through each one an update. We personally have about 30 active across our region alone to maintain.How would you like the feature to work - Highlight the required schedules (from a report or the like), and update using a drop down menu.Current Behaviour - We have to manually update each one with the same exception dates.

Description - Updates Section in the Project and Task Level to have option to Add Table in Rows and Column wiseWhy is this feature important to you - We receive lot of data in tabular from from Internal teams on email and while we want to share that with someone through Workfront , we have to convert that table into image and upload in document , which is double taskHow would you like the feature to work - we will copy the table with data from email and paste it in the update sections Current Behaviour - We are making screenshot of table cells from email and adding it in document section , which is creating multiple images and not acting as a chain Description - Program name to appear at "Issue" FormWhy is this feature important to you - We have a form created at Issue level , there is a field called Program name and we want that field to auto populate with the program that project associated with currently Program name can be only pulled at project level by adding custo