Product Communities

Description - in a project, I would like % Complete column to automatically be calculated based on the actual hours entered by the user.Why is this feature important to you - This will help the project managers to log only the actual hours and not assume the percentage.  The percent value should automatically be calculated based on the project manager's logged Actual hours vs their planned hours on a task.How would you like the feature to work - I would like the % column to automatically be calculated based on the actual hours entered by the user. Also, I would like this percentage to be rolled over to the project level.Current Behavior - In a project, the project managers estimate a percent complete and enter into the % complete column resulting in a number that may or may not be accurate. A Work Around Solution that I created: I created a view. In the view I added the Actual Hours column and a Task Percent complete column.  In the view, I now have the followi

Description - Create a new Product Role in Adobe Target that gives a user all the capabilities of an Approver with the ability to access and edit Administration settings, while then also removing an Approver's ability to access and edit Administration settings since they impact all Workspaces, not just the ones where the user has Approver access. Why is this feature important to you - We've have several instances where someone (there are no logs even available for us to pinpoint the user) changed an Administration setting without alerting anyone that then had a negative impact on all Workspaces. This has left us scrambling on a few occasions to pinpoint the issue - with no control on limiting access to these settings to our true Adobe Target admins. How would you like the feature to work - As stated above, remove an Approver's ability to access/edit Administration settings and create a new Product Role (perhaps just naming in "Administrator"), who has all the a

Allow an administrator to password protect or restrict access to a Document Folder. This would restrict access even for those users who have access to the Project.

In CJA Workspace, the 'image loader' option doesn't work correctly.   When you click to add an image to either the 'description' or 'text' input box, the Workspace project just flickers and it will not let you add an 'https' image reference location.  The attached GIF shows that you can use the 'link' feature, but not the 'import image feature'. To help support adding images of the user experience and company logos to our CJA Projects, I propose we fix this issue.

Description - I would like the ability to add a form field to a timesheet category.  Why is this feature important to you - This would allow us to better track volume of work along with time.  For Example - for a category of PT Scoring, my employee may spend 3 hours on this task in a day, but I don't know if they scored 1 item or 6.  Adding this information in notes is not as report friendly. How would you like the feature to work - I would like to be able to create fields specific to tasks to allow more detailed data, that would be standardized more than using the 'note' feature.Current Behaviour - Notes can be added on the timesheet.  Not as report friendly and free text allows for entry that is not standardized, which makes it more challenging to track and use as a metric.

Description - I would like to be able to see the start and end dates of the stages within an approval processWhy is this feature important to you - This feature would allow more in depth reporting and monitoring of our processes.How would you like the feature to work - As per my attachment we can see the start and end dates of an approval path process we have set up in our instance of Workfront. This approval path consists of two stages and we would like to see the start and end dates of each stage. Current Behaviour - Currently we can only see the start and end dates of the approval path overall and not it's composite stages.

Currently if someone creates a custom form they are forever the owner even if they leave the company. Currently we have a form we cannot unshare with a person because they are the "owner" and we cannot reassign ownership. I would propose the ability to reassign ownership to someone else of the custom form.

Currently, if you are working in a timeline template or in an actual project and you go to edit a field then refresh so that date changes flow through, you are bumped back to the beginning of the schedule. I wish that you could stay in the same portion of the timeline that you were editing, whether in template or project mode.

Currently, it looks like we can only have 2 groupings.

I would like to be able to use $$USER.ID as the access rights when scheduling reports to be sent automatically like in the screenshot below so that I can schedule reports to be sent out with just certain information on them.

In Workfront, it would be great to have a search bar on the Updates page that would search for results within the opened Updates page.  This would cut down on endless page scrolling and make it quick to find specific thread topics within the page. It should also allow for searching for comments made within a date range or for a specific date.   Currently, Updates pages can be cluttered with multiple threads and difficult to find the topic you need.  Some of our projects can span years from start-to-finish and those Updates pages while useful, can be problematic when scrolling through years of comments to find what you need.

Hello, I love the new data warehouse UI and Layout, but would like to see a filter function (report suites, scheduled/completed, etc.) and a csv export of the list of the items as currently filtered. Basically how the scheduled reports export feature functions. I'm having to manually create a list which is quite painful. Thank you,Josh

Add Calculated Metrics (like Distinct Count) to CJA's Full Table Export capabilities. This is important as right now you cannot include them in Full Table Export, which limits what data we can export. For example, if we have a calculated metric taking the sum of 20 different activities, we currently cannot export that information in one table. Instead, we would need to create and export four different tables with all of those activities, and the VLOOKUP them together in Excel. Also, not being able to include Distinct Count metrics is also a major limitation, as that is a very common metric (e.g. 'distinct count of emails received). In an ideal situation, Calculated Metrics would be included in CJA's Full Table Export's OOTB capabilities. 

Description - I would like the ability to have a kanban board feature available in my reports Why is this feature important to you - I would like to have the ability to move my projects from column to column in my Kanban board and focus on only my hot ones. How would you like the feature to work - I could go my current project view report and click on Edit, Charts and the Kanban feature would populate and I could customize my cards and columns for my Kanban boards. I wish reports and Kanbans were more connected and more colorful. Current Behaviour - Currently right now when I want to select a project and create a Kanban board I can only select on project at a time. It's very manual. 

It looks like the Select All and Sort By options never appear on any Brand Portal pages.  Just needs to be the same as appears in Assets   This is simple functioanlity that would imprive the user experience.

I go to the Collections page and click into a collection I've previously created.  I get the assets displayed, but I'm then not able to open the left hand search panel to filter the collection   From the Files section - if I go to filters and select the saved search (collection) - it obviously does allow me filter them.  I want to be able to filter the display of a Collection.  

Ability to add Successors to tasks as you can do with Predecessors through the Task left-hand navigation menu, and Tasks Views

Using the Web SDK debugger on a website with two Web SDK instances makes it hard to differentiate the requests to each instance.In the Web SDK section, the debugger shows network requests to different instances just next to each other.In production, this can be seen on www.spiegel.de from February, 1st. Similar to Adobe Analytics requests shown for each report suite, I'd like to see Web SDK requests instance by instance. 

When we provide a proof link via email through Workfront, it automatically tries to get them to login via the SAML login if they have a Workfront account attributed to their Microsoft email. A lot of our clients are setup with their Microsoft emails but with passwords NOT SAML whilst internally we are setup as SAML only. This means that clients need to navigate away from the link to the login page directly, login and THEN they can go back and click on the link. It's not a great user experience. Can we have some way for the link to pickup if they are password setup or SAML setup?

As a long-time user of Adobe Analytics, I would like to be able to fully analyze my user's behavior within CJA. CJA data views can consist of one data set or several data sets, but as I understand it the concept a 'web visit' is being expanded and re-labeled a 'session' within CJA. It seems obvious that if the data set has a 'time series' component, then the concept of 'sequencing' applies.As such, I propose that we add, at the AEP identity level, the ability for AEP to automatically add in both an 'Event Hit Depth' and 'Session Number' dimension to be used in our CJA data views. For example, let's assume a PERSON went to a company's website (on day 1), bought something at the company's retail store (on day 2) and called the company's customer service hotline (on day 3).Assuming all data is in AEP and all data sources are connected via that 'identify' feature of AEP, then AEP should be able to define the 'Session Number' based on all the known data in AEP and should be able to determin

We use templates to provide our security & project standards (including milestone, approval paths, etc...). We even have a blank template (no tasks) so that if current templates don't apply, a new project still has our basic standards. But, a user with the rights to create a project still can create a project without a template - which then does not follow our standards. We'd like the ability to prohibit users from creating a project without using a template.

We have an existing implementation where teams use a Paragraph Text field to document task/ project updates. A calculated field then captures the date the paragraph text field was last updated. We hoped to improve our users experience by giving them the RTF field in place of the existing paragraph field, however, calculated fields can't be built using RTF fields. We'd like this functionality added along with the ability to see the rich text formatting in reports.

Description - When creating reports for Goals, we noticed that the Goal ID does not actually match the Goal ID. It turns out that Goal ID is pointing to something called an "External ID" which is not available for use in Reports.  Why is this feature important to you -  Add this "External ID" as a column in our reports so we can use this as a way to reference it in with other features - such as CONCATENATING a URL using the root of our instance / goals / <external id> for example.   It seems kind of silly that we can't get the correct ID for a goal if we wanted to use that ID in reporting and other lookups. How would you like the feature to work -  A Column added to the GOALS section in reports.  Enable it in the GOALS API (if that exists).   Current Behaviour - not found anywhere via the existing UI as of 01/22/24 14:31 EST. 

Description - We need a better solution to represent the Project Condition when a project goes On Hold.Why is this feature important to you - Users, especially leaders, are easily distracted by any Project Condition that is not On Target. When a project is on hold, the project condition has little to no meaning.How would you like the feature to work - If a project has a status that equates to On Hold, the Project Condition should either be On Target or null.Current Behaviour - The Project Condition will continue to calculate and eventually show an unfavorable value when a project is On Hold.

At the system admin level, I don't always know what a group needs for templates. In fact, I don't always have influence on those types of things. It would benefit those groups to have access to Blueprints for their own enablement.