Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: It would be excellent if multiple pages under one path could be selected and moved together. Currently only one page can be selected and moved at a time. It seems like the interface and behind-the-scenes processing is already capable of most of the heavy lifting, as a page with hundreds of children can be moved; just not multiple individual pages. Use-case: This feature would be a huge time-saver in situations like: breaking a section of a site into multiple sections closing down a section of a site and redistributing the child pages among a few remaining sections breaking a small news or event hierarchy into a more robust by-year or by-month structure (e.g. sorting 100 articles into 2020, 2021, 2022 folders) moving lots of pages into a folder (e.g. move 100 pages under a new "archived" page) Current/Experienced Behavior: When selecting one page, a "Move" button appears in the toolbar. When selecting more than one, "Move" disappears. Improved/Expected Behavior: When selecting more than one page, "Move" should keep showing. When used, the rest of the interface for choosing the destination, reviewing and updating references will work as-is. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 SP12 Customer-name/Organization name: University at Buffalo Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Hi there!I would love to see a button on the global navigation area to "log in as". While testing/setup/helping a user it requires clicking setup and scrolling down to "log in as" another user. Having this as a button would speed up the process and make it easier for the admins! Yay admins!!Thanks!Chuck
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: The OOTB rollout functionality does not provide any notification or messaging on failed or skipped item, all of them will say successful even though some were not processed. As a result, technical person need to triage the rollout line by line to identify the issue and error in order to fix. Use-case: Current/Experienced Behavior: The rollout functionality shows all items were process, even though some items were failed or skipped. Improved/Expected Behavior: Proper messaging to notify content author which item has failed/skipped roll out and the reasoning. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Hi, Something that has been confusing our users is a message they receive when downloading assets in bulk. When they hit "Download," they see a green message that says, "Your download is generating, and will appear in your inbox when ready." Our users see the word "inbox" and think, "this is going into my Outlook or email inbox." So they sit and wait around for an email that never comes. Little do they know, until they ask me, that the "inbox" is different. Totally confusing. Anyone else also find this confusing? Thanks!
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Improve the UI of user group management in Touch UI Use-case: Authors managing user permissions Current/Experienced Behavior: Current UI can be confusing and hard to read Improved/Expected Behavior: New UI is simplified and made less confusing Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 SP 13 Customer-name/Organization name: Qantas In 6.5 the group management UI can be very confusing compared to 6.3. The UI by default shows all group memberships, including those inherited by other groups. This can be surprising compared to 6.3 which only shows explicit memberships and it makes it a lot less clear what groups the user belongs to. Additionally, the only visual distinction between assigned and inherited group memberships is that the remove button is greyed out on the latter, which is visually very difficult to tell apart and is a bad indicator of which one is which. I'd like to propose two different solution for this: 1) Instead of greying out the remove button on inherited groups, the button should just be hidden altogether. That would make it very clear which groups can and can't be removed manually. 2) Add a checkbox to filter out the inherited groups. I'd suggest making this disabled by default so it mirrors the 6.3 functionality, then users can optionally check it in order to view the inherited groups that a user has. Current 6.5 UI (it is very hard to visually distinguish the valid and invalid remove buttons). 6.5 UI with buttons removed (as you can see it is far easier to tell which groups are removable. To improve the UI layout maybe the explicit groups can be sorted to the top so that the buttons aren't at random intervals)
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Related Case #E-000797571 Use-case: We noticed recently the new warning message added to AEM bulk edit scenario, where user attempt to “Select all” and edit these sub-pages in separate tabs. The warning message says that “Bulk action not supported, The selected action Edit(e) will only have effect X selected items currently loaded…”. As we understand, the justification for that warning message is to let user know that not all sub pages might have been lazy-loaded, and that’s fine. That also explains why the massage doesn’t need to appear when pages have been selected manually. The point is that the mentioned logic might be confusing when there are only few sub-pages to be selected by “select all”. In that case lazy logic is not the case and user can be sure that “select all” picks all the sub pages we have on the screen. Please consider extending that logic, because our customers feels uncomfortable with new behavior and confusing warning. (More detail you can find in thread for Case #E-000797571) Current/Experienced Behavior: Warning message for few pages selected by "select all" Improved/Expected Behavior: For the scenario when only few sub pages exist, warning message is not necessary, even if pages were selected by "select all" Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Adobe Experience Manager (6.5.15.0) Customer-name/Organization name: Wundenmanthompson's customer Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
In order to create a true data dictionary in Workfront for Custom Fields and Forms we need a few more columns available to us. Currently we are bound to using the Description or Instructions fields to hold our history, calculations etc... The weight of the world is on the name and description fields and it becomes unruly for a user to try and decipher what is happening with the field. Due to this limitation we have to keep our Data Dictionary outside of Workfront which has a host of challenges. We would like to be able to add fields as needed to describe the custom field. Out of the box we have a need for the following: - Historical Changes - would be amazing if it was written for us but I will take a blank text field we can add data too. - Field Calculation - we currently have to put this in the description field along with our history - Audit Type - A place to designate if it is an integration field. - Business Owner field - Business Justification field - etc... As a large enterprise user with over 2000 custom fields it is a daunting challenge to keep up with all of the fields and what their purpose is. Leveraging the current base fields is a starting point but it's not enough to be scaleable.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Ability to propagate tag updates on custom fields referencing them Use-case: We have custom fields that are referencing tags. Whenever there are updates on the tag hierarchy like updates and deletions, we would need to do a lot of page re-tagging and updating since the updates are not cascading automatically. Current/Experienced Behavior: Changes on the tag hierarchy does not automatically reflect on custom tag fields Improved/Expected Behavior: Changes on the taxonomy should automatically reflect on the pages using them Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaCS Customer-name/Organization name: N/A Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Alerts are very important to my organization - we use them to send information to vendors and to internal stakeholders. Often times we hear that the alert was never received and there's no way to track what happened - if it bounced, was blocked, delivered, opened, etc. I'm working with a vendor right now with whom we've worked for years and he's suddenly stating that alerts aren't coming through and I have no way to know what's happening with them.Much like email tracking, it would be beneficial to see confirmation tracking on alerts.
Description - I would like to see the ability to take data from one field in Workfront and copy it down to adjacent lower (or upper) fields of the same type, similar to how you can "fill" data in Excel using the corner-drag interface. Why is this feature important to you - Due to the complexity of kickstarts, and the clumsiness of the "edit" interface when trying to mass edit data (too may clicks) I think it would be a big time-saver for users to be able to drag down copied data within the screen interface. Kickstarts are too complicated to allow most users to format and import, and the edit button takes too many clicks to get to the correct custom data section to add the value I want. How would you like the feature to work - I would like to see a dynamic interface on the selected field that indicates the ability to "drag" the data up or down to copy it into adjacent, "like" fields. The assumption would be that the task or project you're trying to drag the data into has the custom form attached and available to hold the data. Big bonus if the system was able to accept a front-end filter to move rows of data that you need to copy into adjacent rows. I think that would be a stretch, but it would be awesome UI. Current Behaviour - Right now the only ways I am aware of to mass copy data into the fields in WF are to use the edit button, after preselecting all of the tasks/projects you want to copy to. You also have to ensure that all of the tasks you selected have the custom form attached and that you also did not accidentally click a single task that already has the value in the field (Which currently completely prevents adding the exact same value to all the other fields you wanted to copy to). The other option is kickstarts. The limitation around the ability to import data to more than one custom form is crippling in this case. It completely hampers the usefulness of the import function. Additionally, using a single custom form actually flies in the face of good data custody and management. I never advise that a team put all of their pertinent data into one single custom form.
I love Adobe Status for current or past issues however I'd love a window into the future. I want a resource that gives me a heads up about scheduled maintenance ahead of time.
It would be so much more de-cluttered if we could apply a filter in here so that we only see the "Experience Cloud" audiences or only the "Target" audiences:
It would be so convenient if there was a place in the Target UI where you could enter IPs to block form showing up in reporting and from seeing experiences.
HiAn idea that would make creating profile scripts slightly less frustrating would be if Target told me within the script editor window whether the script had any syntax errors, or errors that would prevent it going live. Only after saving it, going back out to the 'Profile Scripts' page, waiting for a few seconds, then looking at the status, do I find out if it will run or not. I'd like to be able to check within the editor that the code will run, before saving it.ThanksDan
Feature request to have the option to access last login reports and active user/admin data for Target/Experience Cloud.Thank you.
Description - We would love to receive an emailed alert when our recommendations feed fails. Currently we have to remember to check it from time to time in the UIWhy is this feature important to you - Products will become stale if the feed fails and we do not catch it. This will result in a bad user experience and possible lost revenue. How would you like the feature to work - Have a screen where alerts can be opt'ed into and email addresses entered. Current Behaviour - na
Description - We need the ability to exclude specific data attributes / segments from Target's Auto Personalisation and Auto Target models on a per-activity basis. Currently it is possible to exclude attributes and segments at the client/account level, but this applies to all activities within the client/account.Why is this feature important to you - In our AP activities we see some of the top influential attributes are, based on our intimate knowledge of the data, completely irrelevant to the activity or placement, and are leading to bias in the models. However, in other activities and placements the same attributes are highly relevant. We are not observing the level of performance from AP that we would expect, and attribute the biasing data attributes as one of the contributing factors. How would you like the feature to work - It would be ideal to control this in the UI ourselves, but if we have to go via Client Care that is fine.Current Behaviour - It is not possible, the closest option is to exclude it from all AP & AT activities, which is not appropriate in many situations.
Description - Request a way to pull/see a report showing historical offer changes for each activity in Adobe Target, especially like a detailed change logs.Why is this feature important to you - This will help us consolidate, track, report and reuse the removed or replaced offers and the impacts these updates made on the Activity's performance.How would you like the feature to work - a report showing historical offer changes per activityCurrent Behaviour - The offer usage shows only if it's linked to an activity and the change log shows only high-level "Updated activity". Reference: Customer care ticket # [Incident: 211116-000423]
Feature: Please provide a feature where an email address can be entered to be notified in case a product feed indexing fails.
It would be helpful to see AAM segment IDs along with the audience name. We frequently need to cross reference audiences in AAM and "Audience Analytics" (mc_audiences) in our raw analytics data.
Description - Why is this feature important to you: Changes made to the activity at captured at very high level. Details of changes made are manually captured & tracked through use of "note field". However due to character limitation very limited information can be captured. How would you like the feature to work - Modify change log to capture detailed information for every changes made to the offer or Activity (.i.e. capture what all is being changed). Possibly generate report showing historical offer changes per activity. Current Behaviour - Change log captures information at a very high level showing updated activity (ex: Person X updated particular Offer/Activity) Reference Support Case id - E-000786330 @ddasgupta
When a lead gets booked via Chilipiper with round robin, SFDC then assigns the lead to a sales owner based on auto-assignment rule in SFDC, therefore, creates conflict between the original SDR who has a meeting booked with the lead AND the new SDR that gets assigned via auto-assignment rule. It would be nice to pull a list of records to see the impact from the auto-assignment rule with the reason: synched from salesforce.com fixup lead owner, in a smart list in Marketo for easier troubleshooting purposes.
I know we can tag individual users within a proof, but we have a need to tag teams within a proof.
Description - Would like to be able to pull in the Resolve and Actions that are on proof comments into reporting. Why is this feature important to you - We need to be able to report on this within Workfront so we can see that our teams are being accountable to their work and give us insight into what decision was made on a comment. This would allow us to also have reports for individual users to know what happened with their feedback or not. How would you like the feature to work - Allow the Document Summary Updates feed to pull in the resolve and action decisions so they can be pulled into a Note or Proof report. Current Behaviour - Does not exist. Screenshots below showing the Proof comment thread versus what is currently in the project doc summary updates.
Would like the assignments given on a board to be able to show up in that person's home work list so they can better manage those deliverables.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
